The Federal Reserve Board eagle logo links to home page

Building Sustainable Homeownership:
Responsible Lending and Informed Consumer Choice

Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia
10 Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106
June 9, 2006



Agenda | Transcript printable Printable version (249 KB PDF)

Pages 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 101-125 | 126-150 | 151-175 | 176-200 | 201-221

TranscriptLinePage
  11
  21
  31
              THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD 41
  51
         BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HOMEOWNERSHIP: 61
  RESPONSIBLE LENDING AND INFORMED CONSUMER CHOICE 71
  81
                 10 Independence Mall 91
              Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 101
                 Friday, June 9, 2006 111
  121
  131
  141
TAKEN BEFORE:  Emilie Pakman, Notary Public 151
  161
  171
  181
              CLASS ACT REPORTING AGENCY 191
          Registered Professional Reporters 201
1420 Walnut Street, Suite 1212, Philadelphia, PA 19103 211
                    (215) 928-9760 221
      133 H Gaither Drive, Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 231
                    (856) 235-5108 241
  12
BOARD OF GOVERNORS: 22
           MARK W. OLSON 32
           SAUNDRA BRAUNSTEIN 42
           LEONARD CHANIN 52
           MICHAEL COLLINS 62
PANEL I: 72
           JANICE BOWDLER 82
           DOUGLAS G. DUNCAN 92
           IRA GOLDSTEIN 102
           PETER ZORN 112
PANEL II: 122
           IRV ACKELSBERG 132
           DAVID BERENBAUM 142
           DAVID BLEICKEN 152
           JOE FALK 162
           JACK GUTTENTAG 172
PANEL III: 182
           LORETTA ABRAMS 192
           BRUCE DORPALEN 202
           ERIC EVE 212
           MARK PINSKY 222
           ERIC STEIN 232
  242
           (Whereupon, the proceedings commenced 13
at 8:30 a.m.) 23
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  We will begin.  We 33
have all but one of our panelists.  I understand 43
one of the panelists, Ira Goldstein, is in route, 53
and we have two of the four representatives from 63
the Fed system.  I'm sure the other two will be 73
here shortly. 83
           Let me, first of all, thank 93
Philadelphia Fed for hosting these meetings this 103
morning and providing us with the facilities. 113
These are extraordinarily useful sessions.  We 123
finished the session in Chicago on Wednesday, and 133
we're happy to be here today. 143
           We've got -- just to talk through, if I 153
can, in order to make the best use of the time, 163
we've asked each of the panelists to give us a 173
five-minute opening statement, and after the 183
five-minute statement, what you will get, and 193
would you show them the signs, so that they know. 203
The first is one minute, the second is, time is 213
up.  There's not a lot of ambiguity in those, and 223
we tend to enforce those pretty rigorously, and 233
because of that fact, what we've discovered is 243
that we still, with an hour and a half on this 14
panel, have ample time for discussion and ample 24
time for dialogue. 34
           This panel will go until 10:30.  We 44
will take a break and come back and have a panel 54
from 10:30 to noon.  We'll break for lunch.  And 64
then other another panel and, very importantly, 74
beginning at 3 o'clock, we have what we call an 84
open mike, and people can, who would care to do 94
so, who have a statement they would like to make, 104
are invited to participate at that time, and 114
people will have a three-minute opportunity to 124
speak if they would like to. 134
           Also, for everybody, panelists and open 144
mike participants, if they would like, they have 154
up to August 15th, a time allotted to them, to 164
give an additional written statement that will 174
become part of the permanent record.  And we look 184
forward to a very full exchange. 194
           This is part of a -- this is a -- I 204
think it was 2000, Sandy, that we did the first 214
HOEPA hearings.  After, it was determined -- and 224
of course those hearings resulted in the HOEPA 234
regs that were implemented in 2002.  A tremendous 244
amount of change has taken place in the mortgage 15
industry since that time.  And as a result, we 25
have a number of reasons for holding the hearings 35
today. 45
           Number one, is that we want to examine 55
the extent to which the 2002 HOEPA regs are 65
adequate, are appropriate, or should they be 75
revised.  We also are going to use these hearings 85
to determine the extent to which the channels 95
which mortgages come through are impacting the 105
mortgage process.  It is our intent to look and to 115
use these hearings to determine whether or not 125
there ought to be an amendment for Reg Z as part 135
of this.  And the more soft results we hope to 145
come out of this would be the -- we would look for 155
areas where -- we, the Federal Reserve, could 165
provide additional education, or, if necessary, 175
additional study. 185
           From the Federal Reserve we have a 195
couple people here, Sandy Braunstein, Director of 205
Consumer and Community Affairs; Leonard Chanin, 215
who is the Associate Director of Consumer and 225
Community Affairs; and Mike Collins is with us, 235
from the Philadelphia Fed. 245
           We identify, or at least I identify, 16
four separate important groups that have ownership 26
in this process and are important to the entire 36
mortgage industry, and to the economy for that 46
matter.  Number one, very importantly, is the 56
consumer.  In a free society, in a free economy, 66
there's an underlying presumption that the 76
consumer is responsible for their actions, and the 86
consumer undoubtedly, unquestionably, has been the 96
beneficiary of many of the changes, many of the 106
improvements, that have been taking place in this 116
industry.  It is remarkable, not simply in the 126
mortgage industry, but all credit products for 136
that matter, all financial products, the consumer 146
has benefited enormously by the improvements and 156
the access, but it has been a mixed blessing. 166
           Another group that has a responsibility 176
of course, is the providers and the contacts to 186
this meeting, that would be the mortgage 196
providers.  I have told this story other times; 206
let me tell it again, because I think it brings 216
home, to me, at least, an important point.  Some 226
of you know I spent a good share of my life in the 236
banking industry.  At no point was I primarily a 246
mortgage lender, but I think that over the course 17
of a 16-year banking career I think I was involved 27
in closing more than a hundred mortgage loans, and 37
yet, even with that background, I have never been 47
involved in the closing of my own loan where I 57
haven't felt, somewhat, at a knowledge 67
disadvantage, with respect to the process, because 77
it was a very daunting process.  It requires a lot 87
of paperwork, a lot of signatures, a lot of 97
documentation, and there is an extraordinary 107
knowledge asymmetry.  I think that what that 117
means, is that there is a very significant 127
responsibility that the mortgage lenders have to 137
not take advantage of that knowledge asymmetry and 147
all of us to try to work to find ways to reduce 157
that, or, at least, deal with that.  I don't think 167
that there is a way; it is impossible that you 177
would ever close that gap entirely, but there is a 187
recognition that that gap exists and we need to 197
deal with it. 207
           The third group that I think has a very 217
important role and interest are the community 227
groups and consumer advisory groups.  We have 237
noted, and many of the people involved in mortgage 247
lending have noted, that the best access to the 18
minority communes are through the community 28
activists and through the community organizers. 38
That group provides an access that provides the 48
ability to help close that information gap and 58
make us aware of where there are individuals or 68
institutions, at times, who are taking advantage 78
of that knowledge asymmetry, and so I think that 88
that partnership is an important one. 98
           The fourth group, of course, is the 108
regulators and that's why we're here.  I have said 118
at one point in my life I, also, was involved in 128
advising financial institutions on regulatory 138
affairs and I know from that long experience that 148
there was no group that was more at the forefront 158
of both developing the education and the 168
regulatory construct as was the Federal Reserve. 178
And some of my colleagues, Sandy, in particular, 188
who has been doing it for many, many years, take 198
that role very seriously. 208
           Because we still have one chair empty, 218
we will go counter-clockwise in this meeting. 228
We'll ask you to begin, introduce yourself, 238
introduce your group, speak for five minutes, be 248
mindful of the time, and don't worry, we'll help 19
you if you go over. 29
           Peter Zorn. 39
           MR. ZORN:  I'm Peter Zorn.  My 49
background, to be explicit, is, I'm an economist 59
and researcher.  My experience that I'm speaking 69
from is from years of looking at the HMDA data as 79
well as detailed underwriting data, in terms of 89
credit modeling.  Also, surveys that we have taken 99
for impaired credit and focus groups associated 109
with the surveys and just being in the industry, 119
as it were, in the secondary industry for the last 129
15 years or so. 139
           I'd like to make just a couple of brief 149
observations.  I guess the first, with regards to 159
things that I observe, hypotheses of why they are 169
what they are.  The first is minority borrowers, I 179
guess, stating a point that's well-known, are more 189
likely to pay more for mortgages.  What do I mean 199
when I say that?  One way of characterizing that 209
more explicitly, is that if you look at APR 219
distributions about minority borrowers, you will 229
see that that distribution is shifted to the 239
higher APR for minorities as compared to non 249
minorities. 110
           So, then, the next point I would make 210
would be that differences in those prices, those 310
APRs are greater across markets than within 410
markets.  So another way of making that point is, 510
if you look at subprime borrowers in the APR 610
distribution of subprime borrowers, you would see 710
a difference in those distributions for minorities 810
and non minorities.  That is, in general, 910
minorities would have a slightly higher set 1010
distribution of APRs than non minorities. 1110
           But if you made a different -- looked 1210
at different distributions, if you look, instead, 1310
at the APR distributions of minority borrowers in 1410
the prime market versus the subprime market, you'd 1510
see a much -- substantially larger difference in 1610
distributions.  That is, there's a much bigger 1710
difference -- the difference between minority 1810
borrowers in the prime markets and the subprime 1910
market, minority borrowers, in the subprime 2010
market, pay substantially more than in the prime 2110
market, and that difference between minority 2210
borrowers in general, the bigger difference, would 2310
be in the subprime market between minorities and 2410
non-minority borrowers. 111
           So that leads to, sort of, another 211
observation, which is the, sort of, market 311
segmentation matters.  Does it matter whether your 411
in a prime market or a subprime market, which 511
leads to my next observation, which is that risk 611
explains a lot, but certainly not all of those 711
differences.  And by "risk" I mean, all the risk, 811
credit risk, interest rate risk, prepayment risk, 911
associated with mortgage lending.  One way to put 1011
a little more explicit flavor to that observation 1111
is that if you do statistical estimations of APR 1211
-- I try to explain APR as a function of a lot of 1311
variables, product characteristics, borrower 1411
characteristics, underwriting characteristics -- 1511
what you end up with is, explaining much, again, 1611
but not all, of the differences in APRs, so that 1711
there is an unexplained difference between 1811
minorities and non minorities, but it is 1911
dramatically reduced. 2011
           So, then, I will stop and say that this 2111
is an essential tendency.  So I concede, again, 2211
I'm an economist and a researcher, so I look at 2311
central tendencies, so that is the point I want to 2411
make here, which is, this is a broad central 112
tendency, not that there are not differences that 212
exist for individual borrowers, and minority 312
borrowers can, and sometimes do, pay rates which 412
are higher, and that can't be explained by these 512
models or these stories.  So the question would 612
be, why?  And so, for me, at least part of that 712
explanation is the channel by which borrowers do 812
get their mortgage, and so if we conduct, sort of, 912
another experiment, which is to try to explain APR 1012
differences between minority and non-minority 1112
borrowers by channel. 1212
           So let's look at subprime borrowers. 1312
Well, I'll stop I guess.  Thank you very much. 1412
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Peter, I can assure 1512
you that, I for one -- you're right at the heart 1612
of the issue, which is how do we explain the APR 1712
differences among minority and non-minority 1812
borrowers and what does that mean. 1912
           Ira, thank you for joining us.  In 2012
order to make full use of all of the time, we got 2112
started right at 8:30, and we're a little bit 2212
ahead of the 9:00 start for this panel, but it 2312
will give us the full opportunity.  But we will be 2412
back, and we'll want to come right back to that 113
issue, because there probably is no more -- singly 213
more important issue that we can discuss. 313
           Our next speaker is Doug Duncan, and 413
for those of you that think that something has 513
gone wrong in your internal body antennae has just 613
flipped you over and you are now listening to 713
Garrison Keillor, it is because Doug and I are 813
from the same hometown in Minnesota and we all 913
sound like Garrison Keillor from up there.  So 1013
Doug, if you do keep your accent in check, and 1113
introduce yourself and then speak for five 1213
minutes. 1313
           Just as a reminder, this panel group is 1413
asked to speak on the subprime market and how 1513
consumers shop for credit. 1613
           MR. DUNCAN:  Thank you, and indeed all 1713
our children are above average. 1813
           Good morning.  I'm Doug Duncan, the 1913
Senior Vice President of Research and Business 2013
Development and Chief Economist at the Mortgage 2113
Bankers Association.  Governor Olson and other 2213
members of the Federal Reserve Board, I appreciate 2313
the opportunity to participate in this very 2413
important panel. 114
           MBA members are proud of their 214
participation in the subprime market and would 314
like to share that success with you.  I want to 414
make three points. 514
           First, market compression in subprime 614
rates closer to prime rates, lowering the cost of 714
mortgage credit for subprime borrowers.  Second, 814
foreclosure and delinquency rates are not 914
indications of predatory lending but of the ever 1014
improving precision of lenders' ability to assess 1114
risk; and third, if we want to enable borrowers to 1214
protect themselves in getting the best deal, we 1314
have to do the following:  Improve borrower 1414
education in the mortgage process; make simpler, 1514
more meaningful disclosures; and shop, shop, shop, 1614
or impress upon the consumers the need to 1714
comparison shop for mortgages. 1814
           The subprime market has evolved 1914
dramatically in recent years providing significant 2014
benefits to consumers.  There's little 2114
distinction, today, between prime and subprime, no 2214
credit score threshold, or interest rate, or other 2314
low term specifically defines a loan as subprime. 2414
           Fixed rating examines the securitized 115
loans data and noted that the spread is being 215
weighted average on loan pools identified by the 315
issue as prime.  It is only 200 basis points lower 415
than pools identified as subprime.  In 1999 that 515
spread was about 300 basis points. 615
           There are two major factors accounting 715
for this.  First, compressionate credit spreads 815
across fixed income markets has driven down the 915
cost of subprime credit, and second, competition 1015
has lowered the cost of subprime credit.  This 1115
blurring in the line indicates sustained increased 1215
competition, which improves service and access and 1315
lowers consumer cost.  I caution against over 1415
regulation in the market, as it could eliminate 1515
the benefits subprime markets offers to consumers. 1615
           I'd also like to touch on defaults and 1715
foreclosures in the subprime market to discard the 1815
notion that default and disclosure rates are "too 1915
high" and indicate predatory lending.  It's 2015
important to note that marketplace growth, when 2115
interpreting delinquency and foreclosure numbers. 2215
According to the 2000 HMDA data, there are 8.3 2315
million loan applications.  In 2004, the HMDA data 2415
showed 9.8 million loan applications.  With market 116
growth and constant foreclosure rates, the number 216
of foreclosures will increase. 316
           However, too frequently, some market 416
analysts point to the increased foreclosures as a 516
problem, when it simply reflects a constant or 616
even declining foreclosure rate in the context of 716
market growth.  Subprime borrowers are riskier 816
candidates for credit, as demonstrated by their 916
past performance, so lenders charge them more on a 1016
mortgage to offset the risk of nonpayment.  This 1116
increased risk bears itself out in greater default 1216
and foreclosure rates than in the prime market. 1316
           In the fourth quarter of 2005, the 1416
prime market had a foreclosure rate of 0.4 1516
percent, and the subprime market had a rate of 3.3 1616
percent.  Compare that to the foreclosure 1716
inventory rate of subprime loans of 2001 peaking 1816
at 9 percent.  These numbers tell a good story 1916
about the demand of risk and the wherewithal of 2016
subprime borrowers. 2116
           While mortgage markets are plunging for 2216
consumers, borrowers find it challenging to 2316
understand the mortgage process.  While 2416
overhauling our education system to make financial 117
literacy a priority, it is a long-term goal.  We 217
think three short term steps must be taken to help 317
improve borrower understanding. 417
           First, borrowers have to educate 517
themselves in the mortgage process.  Second, 617
consumers need simpler, more user friendly 717
disclosures about mortgage loans that will help 817
them shop, and then, third, consumers need to shop 917
from lender to lender. 1017
           Our research shows that homebuyers, 1117
particularly first-time homebuyers, rely on a 1217
trusted advisor, who may have an adverse 1317
incentive, to help them through the home buying 1417
mortgage process.  These new buyers, especially 1517
minority first-time homebuyers, either contact 1617
only one lender or are referred by a realtor to 1717
only one lender.  While shopping for a mortgage, 1817
experienced borrowers are more likely to seek 1917
additional rate quotes. 2017
           We welcome your questions relating to 2117
any research we've conducted on topics, such as 2217
predatory lending, HMDA, prepaid penalties, and 2317
what consumers understand about their credit, 2417
particularly renters, and we just did a recent 118
survey on that.  That concludes my comments, and I 218
look forward to working with you, and I'll be 318
happy to answer your questions. 418
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Doug, thank you very 518
much.  The need for simpler disclosures is one 618
that we all agree, it's hard to disagree with 718
that.  The problem is, I think we need to come 818
back and talk about where that responsibility is 918
and how we can work together. 1018
           Janice Bowdler, same rules, same drill. 1118
Introduce yourself and your group, and you have 1218
five minutes for your opening statement. 1318
           MS. BOWDLER:  Good morning.  My name is 1418
Janice Bowdler and on behalf of the National 1518
Council of La Raza I would like to thank the 1618
Federal Reserve for hosting another round of HOEPA 1718
hearings.  I feel honored to be part of such a 1818
distinguished panel. 1918
           As a founder of housing counseling, 2018
NCLR has been working with the mortgage industry 2118
for nearly ten years to increase Latino 2218
homeownership.  From our perspective, the question 2318
of how the consumers choose their loan products is 2418
not only timely, it's critical. 119
           Borrowers rely on the mortgage 219
financing to build home equity that will provide a 319
financial safety net through retirement.  However, 419
inefficiencies in the marketplace are causing 519
adverse market segmentation. 619
           NCLR intends to submit a more in-depth 719
written statement, but today I will briefly 819
describe how the structure of today's mortgage 919
market channels Latino borrowers into the subprime 1019
products; how these borrowers are then steered 1119
toward loans that are profitable for the lender, 1219
rather than suitable for the consumer; and how 1319
both lenders and consumers rely on mortgage 1419
brokers to serve as market intermediaries. 1519
           Let me begin by describing how Latinos 1619
are fairing in the mortgage market. 1719
Non-traditional credit histories and a variety of 1819
underwriting variables common among Latino 1919
borrowers often require manual underwriting.  For 2019
example, 22% of Latinos do not have credit scores. 2119
In a world of automated underwriting, manually 2219
underwritten loans are an unwelcome increase in 2319
time and resources. 2419
           Not wanting the added burden, lenders 120
ration the number of such loans they process and 220
excess demand is then de facto channeled into the 320
subprime market. 420
           Subprime lenders have the same profit 520
motivations as prime lenders, but risk-based 620
pricing allows greater pricing and product 720
discretion, which, in turn, allows lenders to 820
price a loan at any risk level.  The model focuses 920
on placing clients in products that are highly 1020
profitable for the lender rather than suitable for 1120
the borrower. 1220
           The evidence here is clear.  Latinos 1320
are 30 percent more likely to receive loans that 1420
meet the HOEPA rate spread than whites when 1520
purchasing their home.  They are twice as likely 1620
as whites to receive payment option mortgages. 1720
           NCLR's experience with the market busts 1820
the myth that such products are the only ones 1920
available for these hard to serve borrowers.  88 2020
percent of NCLR housing counseling clients are 2120
below 80 percent of area median income, and many 2220
require manual underwriting, but all receive prime 2320
products.  Instead, lenders are looking to cut 2420
costs, please investors, and increase their 121
profits. 221
           The same motivation forces lenders to 321
rely on mortgage brokers.  Mortgage brokers 421
function as intermediaries who help lenders reach 521
deeper into certain markets, and they help them 621
save costs by reducing branch and retail expenses. 721
           Consumers also rely on mortgage broker 821
services, especially Latinos.  Bilingual and 921
bicultural brokers promote themselves as advisors 1021
Latinos can trust to find them the best deal. 1121
However, lender-offered incentives, known as yield 1221
spread premiums, entice brokers to push the cost 1321
of the loan higher.  Coupled with non-traditional 1421
lending products, YSP adds another layer of 1521
subjective pricing to very risky products.  As 1621
will be discussed later, there is valid concern 1721
that this is a formula for foreclose and equity 1821
loss. 1921
           NCLR values the role of the 2021
intermediaries, as can be seen by our support of 2121
housing counselors.  However, this means that 2221
consumers shop for mortgages based on 2321
relationships, rather than on products and 2421
pricing.  Unfortunately, many consumers do not 122
understand the broker is an independent agent. 222
The broker is not professionally or legally 322
required to find the borrower a suitable loan. 422
Many are unaware of the presence of a YSP in their 522
loan, making it virtually impossible for even a 622
well-educated borrower to weigh its costs and 722
benefits. 822
           What's more, recent research by the 922
Federal Reserve concluded that low-income, 1022
lesser-educated recipients of ARMs did not fully 1122
understand the way their loan functioned or the 1222
impact of rising interest rates. 1322
           Many efforts exist to increase 1422
borrower's awareness of their mortgage options and 1522
risks.  Of these methods, housing counseling is 1622
the most effective.  Unlike brokers, housing 1722
counselors do not have a financial interest in the 1822
terms of the borrower's loan, but, unfortunately, 1922
not every consumer has access to their advice 2022
before closing.  Moreover, their hard work is lost 2122
without reinforcement of strong protections and 2222
accountability standards. 2322
           To summarize, the structure of today's 2422
market is not serving Latinos well.  It creates 123
incentives for directing otherwise creditworthy 223
families to subprime, expensive and risky 323
products.  Latino families are forced to rely on 423
subjective pricing models because of inadequate 523
service by the prime markets.  And finally, the 623
lack of professional and legal accountability 723
standards for brokers and lenders leaves families 823
vulnerable. 923
           NCLR would like to make three 1023
recommendations to improve the structure of the 1123
marketplace for Latinos and other underserved 1223
borrowers:  Improve accountability standards; 1323
creates a suitability and anti-steering standard 1423
for lenders and mortgage brokers; strengthens 1523
consumer protections.  Set high standards for 1623
compliance with the new interagency guidance; 1723
ensures victims have access to meaningful 1823
remedies.  And finally, invest in housing 1923
counseling.  Public entities and private mortgage 2023
companies must invest in housing counseling.  It 2123
is a meaningful way to bridge the information gaps 2223
between underserved borrowers and their 2323
homeownership opportunities. 2423
           Thank you.  I would be happy to answer 124
any questions. 224
           GOVERNOR OLSON:  Thank you. 324
           Ira. 424
           MR. GOLDSTEIN:  Good morning.  My name 524
is Ira Goldstein, and I am the Director of Policy 624
and Information Services for a local organization 724
called The Reinvestment Fund.  TRF is the national 824
leader in the financing of neighborhood 924
revitalization, and we have been actively involved 1024
in research related to various aspects of the 1124
housing market. 1224
           Our research in the areas of mortgage 1324
lending, foreclosure and predatory lending has 1424
been supported through the grants from foundations 1524
such as the Ford, William Penn and Goldseker 1624
Foundations in Baltimore, as well as contracts 1724
that we have with the City of Philadelphia, 1824
Department of Banking for the Commonwealth of 1924
Pennsylvania, Delaware Office of the State Banking 2024
Commissioner and the U.S. Attorney.  I've also 2124
testified as an expert in several cases brought by 2224
the local community legal services and by the 2324
Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission, and it's 2424
that body of work and experience that I draw upon 125
for my comments here today. 225
           First, I would say that it's my 325
observation that over the course of time, 425
consumers have become increasingly less able to 525
understand the transactions that they are engaged 625
in.  I say, "increasingly less able", because, 725
over time, the products themselves become more 825
complex, and how those products behave in relation 925
to market changes is also difficult to understand 1025
even for mortgage professionals. 1125
           Not only are these products more 1225
difficult to understand, they're also more 1325
frequently subject to mortgage fraud.  Reports 1425
from Fitch Ratings are clear on this point, and 1525
consumers with whom we work show a limited degree 1625
of comprehension about what they're doing in these 1725
transactions.  And that's even the case after they 1825
receive counseling. 1925
           The work of Alan White convincingly 2025
demonstrates that the reading comprehension levels 2125
of borrowers is all too often less than is 2225
necessary to effectively understand the 2325
transactions to which they are.  The consensus is 2425

Class Act Reporting Agency, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 215-928-9760

Pages 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 101-125 | 126-150 | 151-175 | 176-200 | 201-221


2006 Hearings