The Federal Reserve Board eagle logo links to home page

Building Sustainable Homeownership:
Responsible Lending and Informed Consumer Choice

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105
June 16, 2006



Agenda | Transcript printable Printable version (310 KB PDF)

Pages 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 101-125 | 126-150 | 151-175 | 176-200 | 201-225 | 226-250 | 251-254

TranscriptLinePage
on what the real costs are of these loans because so much, 1201
you know, drives from the decisions that you make after the 2201
loan is closed. 3201
        So I think it does speak to the importance of the 4201
disclosure, and trying as our statement said to include some 5201
of these ongoing fees that aren't fairly captured and this -- 6201
in the current disclosure formula.  So I think there is some 7201
room for improvement there. 8201
        MR. CHANIN:  Okay. 9201
        MR. AXELSON:  One thing.  One of the biggest 10201
complaints I hear from my clients is that they need more and 11201
better qualified counselors because they -- I mean, it's much 12201
better for the lending community to get an educated consumer 13201
who understands the product when they come back to them from 14201
counseling. 15201
        I mean, most of the lenders do not -- you know, 16201
don't want to shove this down someone's throat when they 17201
don't understand what they're doing.  That's not going to 18201
help anybody. 19201
        MS. BELLING:  And we need more funding to pay for 20201
the counseling.  Because HUD can mandate it, but there isn't 21201
money behind it.  And we have a real predicament with the 22201
growth of the market now. 23201
        The origination fees are just a percentage of the 24201
HUD limit or the home value, so they're ramping up every year 25201
and that just drives the costs up. 1202
        And, you know, the average origination fee on these 2202
loans now is $5,000 versus the average maximum claim amount 3202
is $250,000.  And yet we're struggling to get 100 a 125 or 4202
$150 fee to pay for what in our case constitutes two to three 5202
hours of in-depth personalized one-on-one counseling with a 6202
homeowner. 7202
        So not only is the counseling important, but it has 8202
to be supported in a way that's sustainable so that the 9202
counselors who do this really important good work are 10202
reimbursed appropriately for their efforts. 11202
        MR. CHANIN:  Jim or Ruth? 12202
        MS. ROMAN:  I just wanted to say that HUD is moving 13202
in the direction of certifying counselors.  We recognize that 14202
we need to make sure that quality counseling is taking place. 15202
And so we have a proposed rule that we're planning on putting 16202
forth that would require all HECM counselors to take an exam, 17202
to pass the exam in order to provide HECM counseling.  And 18202
also to have ongoing continuing education as well. 19202
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Peter. 20202
        MR. BELL:  Yeah, two things.  One, I'd like to 21202
correct something for the record that was said that's 22202
incorrect, which is the statement was made that there's -- 23202
there is translation requirements under Civil Code in 24202
California for mortgages but not for reverse mortgages. 25202
        Reverse mortgage is subject to the same Civil Code 1203
on that.  The exemptions under the Civil Code are for certain 2203
types of licenses, and those exemptions exist for all 3203
mortgages, whether they're reverse or not. 4203
        The pending legislation would take reverses and 5203
treat them separately from other mortgages so there would no 6203
longer be the exemptions that exist for the mortgages.  But 7203
we do currently come under the same Civil Code. 8203
        On the counseling issue, funding for counseling has 9203
been very problematic.  The state involved, AARP, the 10203
department, the industry, the counseling community, have all 11203
been working together to try and address this. 12203
        And my understanding is that HUD is close to issuing 13203
a mortgagee letter that will allow a counselor -- I'm sorry, 14203
a borrower to pay a fee for counseling out of the loan 15203
proceeds. 16203
        And after the counseling session the -- basically 17203
the counseling certificate will have details of the 18203
counseling session and the fee to be paid and, upon closing, 19203
the lender will remit that fee to the counseling agency to 20203
cover that. 21203
        And that will provide a lot more financial support 22203
for counseling than is available now.  And my understanding 23203
is that mortgagee letter is -- whatever this means in HUD 24203
terms -- eminent. 25203
        MS. BELLING:  The complication from our point of 1204
view is that will apply to any HUD-approved housing 2204
counseling agency and any HECM counselor.  So it will allow 3204
the person propped up watching the 30-minute video, now allow 4204
that counseling agency to charge that fee to a borrower, 5204
prospective borrower.  They aren't a borrower at that time. 6204
The consumer.  So they really don't get anything for their 7204
money and now they're having to pay for it on top of it. 8204
        So we're hopeful that HUD will move forward with the 9204
exam requirement as quickly as possible.  And we see this as 10204
an interim solution that we support, but we really need to 11204
close the loop and make sure that if people are required to 12204
pay a fee for a service that they're getting a service 13204
that's -- they're getting their money's worth. 14204
        MR. BELL:  Right.  Presumably once HUD implements 15204
this exam, in order to get paid, the counselor will have to 16204
have passed that exam and be on the roster. 17204
        MS. BELLING:  Right.  But they're not happening at 18204
exactly the same time. 19204
        MR. MAHONEY:  As one last comment, there are tools 20204
in the marketplace already to support better counseling and 21204
such and many of the counselors use them. 22204
        AARP developed model specifications for illustration 23204
software that -- we developed our own proprietary software 24204
used by all of our brokers as well as our retail loan 25204
officers to illustrate the product.  And that software is 1205
used by almost 2,000 counselors in the marketplace today. 2205
        So the tools are out there.  Getting the 3205
certification and getting the funding is the two 4205
primary issues. 5205
        MR. CHANIN:  Jim, can I ask you a question?  Do you 6205
retain the mortgages you originate, your reverse mortgages, 7205
or do you sell them? 8205
        MR. MAHONEY:  We sell them into the secondary 9205
market. 10205
        MR. CHANIN:  And if you could tell me, does 11205
Fannie -- or is there an active secondary market?  Has it 12205
developed or is it developing or -- other than Fannie Mae? 13205
        MR. MAHONEY:  Historically all -- Fannie Mae has 14205
been the only investor in the FHA, HECM and the Home Keeper, 15205
which is their proprietary product.  Lehman Brothers has been 16205
the sole purchaser of our proprietary product, the Cash 17205
Account, as such in recent years.  That's changing and I 18205
think you'll see new investors emerge this year. 19205
        MR. CHANIN:  Okay. 20205
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Okay.  I think we're going to wind 21205
down here.  Anybody want to make any last comments? 22205
        MR. AXELSON:  I just have -- I have a problem with 23205
these foreign language requirements.  Because where do you 24205
draw the line? 25205
        I mean, it certainly -- with Spanish, which is one 1206
of the largest non-English speaking groups in the country. 2206
But then, you know, I understand like in California, there 3206
are I forget how many dialects of Asian.  I mean, where do 4206
you draw the line? 5206
        And how does the private market keep up with -- I 6206
mean, how many sets of documents in how many languages are 7206
you going to be required -- are you going to require in -- 8206
you know, different states you have different minorities. 9206
Where does that go? 10206
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Shirley. 11206
        MS. KROHN:  No, I agree with you actually.  The 12206
Civil Code 1932 in California stipulates the six languages as 13206
being Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese, or Korean 14206
because that represents the greatest population.  May be 15206
different in Nevada.  I mean, if you're looking at a federal 16206
statute about this, it could be different in Arizona. 17206
        Every state is going to have to -- if people agree 18206
with the whole notion about doing counseling and having the 19206
documents in the language that it's negotiated, we can't 20206
assume that everybody is going to understand the English 21206
version or you just -- you know, just not going to work. 22206
        But you're right.  Every state is going to have 23206
their own language requirements.  And how does the statute 24206
define Chinese? 25206
        MR. AXELSON:  Right.  That's what I'm saying.  I 1207
mean, how -- I mean, lenders dealing with state -- you know, 2207
54 jurisdictions between the territories and now they may 3207
have different states are going to require disclosures in 4207
different languages and different dialects?  I mean, it's 5207
not -- it's not workable. 6207
        MR. CHANIN:  Sounds like you need to brush up on 7207
those late-night language lessons there. 8207
        MR. AXELSON:  You know, even the new immigration 9207
bills are requiring that people learn English.  At a certain 10207
point I think you can't call on the lending community to 11207
cater to every foreign language. 12207
        MR. BELL:  There are provisions -- 13207
        MS. KROHN:  All I can say is I would hope that every 14207
potential borrower would have an equal opportunity at getting 15207
information about a loan or about a product that they are 16207
applying for, feel that it's -- it's a necessity in their 17207
lifetime and that they understand the documents that they are 18207
signing.  And if that means putting them in that language, 19207
then I think it's a no-brainer.  But that's my opinion. 20207
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  And I think we'll let that be the 21207
last word.  And I want to thank our panelists very much for 22207
coming today and we really appreciate it. 23207
        We are going to take a short break.  We're going to 24207
take a ten-minute break.  It's ten of 3:00.  At 3:00 we will 25207
reconvene for the open mic session. 1208
        If you have signed up, we would ask that during 2208
those ten minutes you come forward to the front of the room 3208
and identify yourself -- John, there you are.  Okay.  If you 4208
have signed up for the open mic, if you would identify 5208
yourself to John, right there who is waving.  And we will 6208
start at 3:00. 7208
             (Whereupon a recess was taken.) 8208
        MR. OLSON:  Okay.  We're going to get started now. 9208
The sign-up is over.  We're starting the session. 10208
        And we have a lot of people.  We are -- as we said 11208
this morning, each person will have three minutes to make 12208
their statement.  However, I want to reiterate the fact that 13208
you can submit for the record a written statement as long as 14208
you would like and you have until August 15th to do that. 15208
        So if you don't have it with you today, you can 16208
submit it afterwards, anytime up until August 15th.  And we 17208
would like to hear from you.  So feel free to do that. 18208
        But for purposes today of speaking, you have three 19208
minutes.  And Naomi, who is the timekeeper -- raise your 20208
hand -- will give you a sign when you have one minute left 21208
and then when your time is up and we'll move on to the next 22208
person. 23208
        I would ask people -- I do have a sign-up list, but 24208
I understand some people -- it's not perfect because some 25208
people who signed up this morning aren't here and things like 1209
that. 2209
        So I would ask, too, for the record, for purposes of 3209
the court reporter, that you start by just giving your name 4209
and the organization that you -- if you're representing an 5209
organization.  Some people may just be representing 6209
themselves, which is fine, and then make your statement. 7209
        And we'll start -- Waiching, we'll start with you. 8209
You I know. 9209
        MS. WONG:  Okay.  Thank you. 10209
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  But introduce yourself for the 11209
court reporter. 12209
        MS. WONG:  Sure.  My name is Waiching Wong and I'm 13209
currently a program manager for economic development at the 14209
Greenlining Institute.  We're in Berkeley, California.  And 15209
we're a multi-ethnic public policy advocacy institute that 16209
seeks to provide consumer protection to low-income minority 17209
communities. 18209
        And currently there's about, we guess, $1 trillion 19209
at least in the home equity market.  And this market is 20209
essentially unregulated, and not because it's unimportant to 21209
regulate but because of substantial amount of subprime 22209
lending that we're concerned about is done outside and to 23209
those -- done by those who are outside the purview of 24209
regulations.  So we believe that the situation is much more 25209
dangerous than most people suspect. 1210
        And one example that Greenlining has been involved 2210
with is Ameriquest, an institution that had best practices in 3210
place for subprime lending and that even testified on them, 4210
but then they violated their own best practices because 5210
people within the organization that had decision making power 6210
also had huge financial incentives to violate them. 7210
        So with this history in mind, Greenlining has two 8210
recommendations.  First, we believe that the five or ten 9210
largest regulated financial institutions with expertise in 10210
home equity loans should, with strong community input, 11210
develop a national standard that can be regulated yearly and 12210
can inspire national confidence. 13210
        Once there is such agreement, many community groups, 14210
including Greenlining's members, including Alan Temple 15210
Baptist Church and West Angeles CDC just to name a few, would 16210
support that federal legislation that would make it tougher 17210
for nonregulated institutions to have lower standards. 18210
        And what we mean by that is the regulation would 19210
enforce that and require that every unregulated lender put on 20210
their applications, in bold letters, and in strong language, 21210
language that informs potential borrowers that, A, this 22210
institution is not regulated by federal regulations, that 23210
this loan may not meet the high standards that are set forth 24210
by the industry. 25210
        And also, as a result of that, all loans -- and 1211
under this the loan notice cannot be final for 14 days and 2211
the borrower be given 1-800 hotline that is staffed by 3211
multilingual experts who can inform borrowers if the loan 4211
meets federal standards, if there are alternative options 5211
available, and can also refer the borrower to other 6211
institutions that can offer them something better. 7211
        And this alternative has already been examined by 8211
lawyers and deemed constitutionally valid.  And Greenlining 9211
will be presenting this idea again to the new Federal Reserve 10211
chairman later this year at out annual meeting and also 11211
expect to meet with Sheila Behr, the soon-to-be new chair of 12211
the FDIC, and John Dugan, who is already taking action in 13211
this regard.  And we want to discuss those things with them. 14211
        And Greenlining believes that these recommendations 15211
can greatly reduce the harm that ensues from the predatory 16211
subprime lending and, you know, prevent that type of lending 17211
altogether. 18211
        Thanks. 19211
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you. 20211
        Next. 21211
        MR. KENNEDY:  Thank you.  Good afternoon.  I'm Allan 22211
Kennedy.  I'm from the San Francisco District Attorney's 23211
Office here on behalf of San Francisco District Attorney 24211
Kamala Harris. 25211
        I work in the elder abuse unit and I also handle the 1212
real estate fraud matters that our office prosecutes.  And I 2212
just want to basically put on the record for -- as far as 3212
this hearing is concerned that DA Harris and our office are 4212
very concerned about the use of predatory loans, particularly 5212
in the San Francisco area, of course, since that's what we 6212
prosecute. 7212
        Unfortunately, we have a very large number of 8212
potentially vulnerable elders in our district, in our 9212
jurisdiction here, that are homeowners, long-time homeowners, 10212
who have been subject to very predatory or very onerous 11212
conditions in terms of loans that have been made, either in 12212
terms of reverse mortgages, in terms of second home 13212
mortgages, or equity lines of credit.  And unfortunately 14212
they've been -- often take advantage of the vulnerabilities 15212
of the elders in our community. 16212
        And we've had this -- we've had a number of cases 17212
come to our attention in our office over the preceding years 18212
involving elders who have very limited mental competency, and 19212
that is made obvious when assessments are done by say 20212
psychologists or psychiatrists and yet these people have 21212
committed themselves to very difficult home loans that 22212
unfortunately, in many instances, have resulted in 23212
foreclosures and loss of their homes. 24212
        And it's a real concern of our office that whatever 25212
tightening of regulation -- and I'm not one to be as good on 1213
the specifics of that as many of the speakers here today are, 2213
but any tightening of regulations in terms of the subprime 3213
market, particularly as it relates to the elderly is 4213
concerned, we are very much in support of because of the many 5213
instances that we've seen over the years in which the senior 6213
citizens in this area have been subject to these kinds of 7213
loans. 8213
        With the high value of real estate in San Francisco 9213
and the whole Northern California area, this is really a 10213
problem because it's almost been a real magnet to people from 11213
outside the area to come here to seek to make high 12213
commissions on the -- on second or equity lines of credit on 13213
our homes here. 14213
        And so I'm just here to say that we see this problem 15213
a lot in our office.  And we just hope that whatever further 16213
regulation that can happen or requirements on counseling 17213
or -- because we have a very diverse society -- very diverse 18213
community here, the requirements that were discussed earlier 19213
about language requirements, they're very much a problem for 20213
our senior citizens in this community as well. 21213
        So thank you. 22213
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you. 23213
        MR. ZAHRADKA:  Good afternoon.  My name is James 24213
Zahradka.  I'm a senior attorney with Public Interest Law 25213
Firm, which is a project of the Law Foundation of Silicon 1214
Valley in San Jose.  Thanks for the opportunity to speak 2214
today. 3214
        And at first I just think I need to say that I was 4214
under the understanding that we get five minutes today based 5214
on the press release.  I'll limit my comments to three.  But 6214
I think that's unfortunate. 7214
        I just hope that the written comments are indeed 8214
taken quite seriously and reviewed with perhaps even more 9214
care given the limitations on time. 10214
        So I'll give you my three recommendations first and 11214
then do as much detail as I can given the short time. 12214
        First, the Fed should bring more high-cost loans 13214
within HOEPA's protections for borrowers against predatory 14214
lenders.  And specific ways to do that -- you've heard a 15214
little bit about these already -- but you should include YSPs 16214
and prepayment penalties in the points and fees calculation 17214
and also lower the points and fees trigger from eight to 18214
four, five percent of the loan amount. 19214
        Secondly, the Fed should protect consumers from 20214
unscrupulous lenders and brokers who seek to take advantage 21214
of borrowers who are not fluent in English.  And you heard a 22214
little bit about that, too.  Modeling on Civil Code 1632 I 23214
think is a good way to start. 24214
        And third, the Fed should protect borrowers from 25214
being pushed into loans that are not suitable for them.  And 1215
one very key aspect of that is the abuse of no document or 2215
low document loans.  You also heard about that a little bit 3215
earlier.  And I'll hopefully have some time to give you a 4215
little detail about that. 5215
        So our experience with this is based on my -- my 6215
program and our sister program, Fair Housing Law Project, 7215
representation of dozens of borrowers over the past five 8215
years or so after our colleague, Heidi Li, started us in this 9215
work some time ago when she was with our organization.  We've 10215
represented them on -- dozens of people who have been 11215
victimized by predatory lenders. 12215
        Particularly we had two cases involving groups of 13215
homeowners who were victimized based on their language 14215
ability and/or ethnicity.  And this gets to the issue in 15215
the -- I think in the public request for comments about the 16215
HMDA data, which shows indeed Latino home buyers are getting 17215
costlier loans.  These cases show very clearly that that was 18215
based on factors not related to legitimate underwriting 19215
criteria but it was based specifically on their ethnicity or 20215
on their language abilities. 21215
        And that -- those cases, one was a purchase loan and 22215
one was a refinance, which I think underlines Judy Zeigler's 23215
point earlier that HOEPA should indeed be expanded to include 24215
purchase loans. 25215
        So we've also advocated for some legislation in this 1216
area.  We were stymied on the local front by California 2216
Supreme Court decision about Oakland's ordinance and we've 3216
been stymied on the state level frankly by the financial 4216
industry's very strong position in Sacramento.  You might say 5216
stranglehold. 6216
        So we really look to the Fed for leadership in this 7216
area.  We're not having a lot of luck in these other arenas. 8216
So we hope you all will do something about this. 9216
        So getting to the YSP issue, the whole point of 10216
these fees is to award the broker for getting a more 11216
expensive loan.  So to not include those in the calculation 12216
when you're deciding when a consumer is getting into a 13216
dangerous loan it seems unfair. 14216
        And I'm out of time, which is quite disappointing. 15216
But I guess I will give the rest of my comments in writing. 16216
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much. 17216
        Next.  Mr. McCurdy? 18216
        MR. McCURDY:  Yes.  Thank you.  My name is Jonathan 19216
McCurdy.  Thank you for coming. 20216
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Can you speak directly into the mic 21216
so people -- 22216
        MR. McCURDY:  Thank you for coming.  Thank you for 23216
coming. 24216
        I've been a lawyer in both public and private 25216
practice for 30 years, working in low-income minority 1217
communities.  For at least the past ten years, I've been 2217
working on behalf of victims of predatory loans or mortgage 3217
brokers who sell them. 4217
        I am not here today, though, to talk on behalf of 5217
the victims.  I'm here today to offer you a perspective from 6217
the elicit unscrupulous mortgage broker. 7217
        In California real estate and mortgage brokers 8217
operate under the same license, and we as mortgage brokers 9217
work very hard every day in the vineyards of the distressed 10217
non-English homeowner. 11217
        Our message to you is that we really like the 12217
regulation scheme and the -- and the effort put into this the 13217
way it is.  Through a dedicated team of language-sensitive 14217
community runners, cooperative no CM lenders, flexible 15217
closing day investors who can get as much as 400 percent 16217
annual rate of return, entrepreneurial straw buyers who we've 17217
been paying 3,000 a hit to act as purchasers -- but now we 18217
found we can use stolen identities and eliminate that cost, 19217
pocket it ourselves. 20217
        Through the use of this dedicated team, we're able 21217
to resource underutilized and wasted equity -- I heard people 22217
refer to this as skimming.  I think that's a very bad word 23217
for it -- we're able to resource this underutilized and 24217
wasted equity from the low-income communities and release it 25217
into the marketplace, where it will do some good for all of 1218
us, not just the unfortunate homeowner who is probably going 2218
to lose her house anyway. 3218
        My message is don't change a thing.  But most 4218
critically, if you're going to change some things, keep 5218
income asset stated loans, yield spread premiums, English 6218
only docs, real important asininity immunity.  If the banks 7218
were on the hook for all this elicit conduct, I just think 8218
they'd stop it. 9218
        Unfettered underwriting discretion, don't tighten 10218
that up, please.  And of course -- this goes to an issue 11218
brought earlier -- please don't spend any money on 12218
enforcement because right now we can get away with anything. 13218
If you change any of these things I've talked about, I'm out 14218
of business. 15218
        Thank you. 16218
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you. 17218
        MR. MORGAN:  My name is Ian Morgan.  I represent 18218
AARP and the Community Action Volunteer Center, Santa Clara 19218
county.  And I'm also a volunteer in the San Jose Information 20218
Center, which is rather unique.  It's the only one in 21218
Northern California. 22218
        Thank you.  I learned a little today.  I thought I 23218
knew a little.  Now I'm little confused.  When I get a phone 24218
call on anybody inquiring, we simply refer them to the 25218
Council on Aging because we don't know how to do any better 1219
than that.  We know they've been very busy, particularly with 2219
counseling for Medicare Part D. 3219
        Obviously counseling is very important.  We think it 4219
is essential, is mandatory.  And my own personal view is I 5219
think, like any other professional occupation, it should be 6219
certified by examination. 7219
        That's all I have to say.  Thank you. 8219
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Okay.  Thank you very much. 9219
        UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER:  My name is Nuris (phonetic). 10219
And I'm retired.  I'm a volunteer for AARP and part of the 11219
Community Presents Team for the Concord area.  We generally 12219
do have a lot of seniors and we do get feedback from them. 13219
        The thing that most of the people over there feel is 14219
they want strong, meaningful consumer protections against 15219
predatory lending.  Having said that, AARP earlier expressed 16219
a position of counselors, which makes absolute sense.  The 17219
counselors should not only be -- there should be funding 18219
released.  But not only should they be trained, tested, and 19219
available, but they also should be held accountable for the 20219
advice they give.  And there must be some mechanism. 21219
        When we have these counselors advise an elderly lady 22219
who is 70 years old and say, "Okay.  Go ahead and do this," 23219
and if that is a very wrong advice, then the counselor should 24219
also be held responsible.  So there should be mechanism to 25219
get the elderly person the right, honest, good advice that 1220
the person needs.  It shouldn't be haphazard.  It should be 2220
carefully thought out when the person gives an advice. 3220
        The other thing was things should be in plain 4220
English.  If it is two percent, it should mean two percent 5220
and not 2.3 percent.  Because elderly people are real aligned 6220
to figure that one out, you know.  And if you advertise in 7220
Spanish, then you should be able to give the document in 8220
Spanish to a Spanish-speaking person because you have taken 9220
the trouble to advertise in Spanish.  So why can't you have 10220
the documents for signature in same language?  Otherwise 11220
don't advertise in Spanish. 12220
        And the last but least is we need you, you people, 13220
to look at how to reduce the closing costs.  They are high. 14220
        Thank you. 15220
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much. 16220
        MR. KRYSTOFIAK:  Thank you very much for allowing me 17220
the opportunity.  Governor, I appreciate you being here, 18220
along with the council. 19220
        My name is Steve Krystofiak and I am a mortgage 20220
broker.  I'm a mortgage broker that is sick to my stomach to 21220
see how this industry is being used on a daily basis here in 22220
California. 23220
        I'd like to start off with a question to Leonard. 24220
Leonard, what is a subprime loan? 25220
        MR. CHANIN:  I don't think we're responding to 1221
questions.  There is no definition that I'm aware of of a 2221
subprime loan. 3221
        MR. KRYSTOFIAK:  Exactly.  And that's very scary 4221
today that subprime loan -- I've heard that terminology 5221
today easily over 50 times.  And it's very scary that there 6221
is no definition but yet it's been used 50 to 100 times 7221
today. 8221
        I'll tell you another thing that is scary.  I'm a 9221
mortgage broker that has access to a loan where I can do 100 10221
percent financing, meaning no down payment, stated income. 11221
        That means the stenographer here could tell me she's 12221
making $200,000 and I'll believe it.  She could also tell me 13221
that she has $500,000 in the bank.  I'll believe that, too. 14221
She could also have a FICO score of 620, where 680 is 15221
average.  So she could have a very low, low FICO score.  And 16221
I could get her a loan for $950,000.  That is scary, also. 17221
        Banks are lying when they tell you that stated 18221
income is only for people with high FICO stores.  I think I 19221
just proved that.  Banks are also lying to you when they say 20221
that stated income loans or stated asset loans are just for 21221
people with low LTV.  I think I just proved that as well. 22221
        I have taken an informal survey of account 23221
executives from banks.  And these are federally charted 24221
banks, ones that would have their same names on baseball 25221
stadiums, football stadiums, ones that everyone here in the 1222
audience has heard of.  And they said between 40 and 50 2222
percent of their loans in the Bay Area are stated income 3222
loans. 4222
        I think that's a very strong answer to why incomes 5222
in the Bay Area having been relatively flat over the last 6222
four years but why home prices have doubled.  There should be 7222
a very strong correlation, and that is stated income loans. 8222
        The fed government has come up with an idea saying, 9222
well, with subprime loans and nontraditional loans, DTI 10222
limits should be higher.  Well, why should DTI limits -- for 11222
anyone who doesn't know, that's debt-to-income.  It's a 12222
ratio.  Come and see me later if you want me to explain that 13222
a little more.  Debt-to-income limits should be a little 14222
lower.  Well, that won't do anything if I'm telling you I 15222
make $200,000.  I'll just say I make 250 instead. 16222
        Some people might say that there's a reason why 17222
stated income -- it helps people get homes.  It does.  It 18222
gets people homes who are on a cash business.  I don't 19222
believe that banks should be rewarding people who only make 20222
cash, don't pay taxes, with easier ways to buy a home.  I 21222
also believe that that makes it an easier tool for people to 22222
get homes that they truly cannot afford. 23222
        I'd like to audience to take a second to think 24222
imagine if colleges -- Department of Education I'm sure would 25222
like to have more people go to college.  Imagine if when 1223
you're 18 years old, 17 years old, filling out your college 2223
application, imagine if you could just simply state your GPA, 3223
state your SATs.  Everyone would be wanting to go to Stanford 4223
and would be qualified. 5223
        Everyone in America wants that American dream to own 6223
a home.  Through stated income loans, they are qualified with 7223
a low or high FICO score. 8223
        Now, what would happen -- 9223
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you, Steven.  I think 10223
that's -- we'll stop there.  But we'll look forward to your 11223
longer written comments being submitted into the record. 12223
        MR. KRYSTOFIAK:  I don't write books very well but 13223
okay. 14223
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you. 15223
        MS. UPP:  Thanks for having us here today.  And I 16223
appreciate the time to speak with the Federal Reserve Board 17223
of Governors. 18223
        My name is Stephanie Upp and I'm vice president of 19223
the San Francisco Earned Assets Resource Network, or EARN. 20223
We help low-income families save money and invest in assets, 21223
homeownership, small business, and college education.  We do 22223
that through a two-for-one savings account that's matched. 23223
It is called an individual development account. 24223
        And what I want to talk about today -- I agree with 25223
a lot of what's been said so far.  One concern that I have 1224
and I want to make sure that you all note this is that the 2224
emphasis, especially in the last panel, on education and 3224
counseling, by far we understand that education is important 4224
component of building assets and homeownership and that we 5224
want to give people the tools and the education and skills 6224
that they need to make wise choices, but nobody out there is 7224
going to make -- with all the education in the world is going 8224
to make a wise choice if the only products they have 9224
available to them is predatory products. 10224
        Again, what we didn't talk about at all on the last 11224
session on reverse mortgages was the back end of those 12224
products that were being offered.  We talked about how they 13224
operate, how you can enter into them, and then we had more of 14224
half of our discussion was about education and counseling and 15224
certifying counselors. 16224
        But just to echo what these two gentlemen said, 17224
while it's important, we have no way, then, of certifying the 18224
motivations of those counselors after the fact.  And again, 19224
if the only product available to our senior citizens, our 20224
minorities, folks with low income and low credit scores are 21224
predatory mortgages, then as a general society, as local 22224
economies and state economies, we're just setting ourselves 23224
up to fall. 24224
        And I just also want to express concern over zero 25224
down loans, three and five year ARMs, especially now as 1225
interest rates are starting to go up.  We understand that our 2225
low-income clients are investing in houses and buying them 3225
and we're very concerned about the mortgages that they're 4225
entering into. 5225
        And so we're starting to focus on housing 6225
preservation measures and what kinds of tools and skills and 7225
products can we develop to help our low-income -- low and 8225
moderate income families stay in the houses that they're 9225
purchasing today. 10225
        And we want to make a call now to all the bankers, 11225
mortgage brokers, and realtors in the room to be socially 12225
responsible, to join us and to build products, and to 13225
advocate for a better and more responsible lending. 14225
        MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much.  Thank you 15225
all. 16225
        And we'll have the next group of people come up, if 17225
they're here.  Pearl Caldwell, Eve Orton -- and by the way, I 18225
totally apologize if I'm mispronouncing any names -- Don 19225
Gerimonte, Peter Szego, Gerald DeRyan, Laura Baldwin, Moses 20225
Diaz, and Celia Blanco.  Those folks could come forward. 21225
        Same as before, we have a timekeeper who is right 22225
there, Naomi, and she will signal you when you have one 23225
minute left and then when your time is up.  Everybody has 24225
three minutes. 25225

Professional Reporting Services, Inc., Walnut Creek, California, 800-261-4814

Pages 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 101-125 | 126-150 | 151-175 | 176-200 | 201-225 | 226-250 | 251-254


2006 Hearings