The Federal Reserve Board eagle logo links to home page

Building Sustainable Homeownership:
Responsible Lending and Informed Consumer Choice

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
1000 Peachtree Street N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309
July 11, 2006



Agenda | Transcript printable Printable version (282 KB PDF)

Pages 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 101-125 | 126-150 | 151-175 | 176-200 | 201-226

TranscriptLinePage
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much.  Ms. Brown? 1201
          MS. BROWN:  Thank you.  My name is Karen Brown. 2201
I'm a staff attorney at the Home Defense Program of the 3201
Atlanta Legal Aid Society.  I want to tell you about one of 4201
my clients, who's sitting here with me today, Ms. Eloise 5201
Manuel.  Ms. Manuel is 66 years old.  She's African- 6201
American.  She's lived in her home in DeKalb County, 7201
Georgia, for 33 years. 8201
          Until she retired four years ago, Ms. Manuel 9201
worked primarily in food service, preparing salads and 10201
working as a line server.  Other jobs she held included 11201
making picture frames and cleaning office buildings.  In 12201
2000 Ms. Manuel paid off her original purchase money 13201
mortgage.  Her home was free and clear. 14201
          A few years later, she decided to apply for a 15201
mortgage loan to pay her bills.  When she made her 16201
application, the mortgage broker pulled her credit and found 17201
that her FICO credit score was 703.  The broker was 18201
surprised, but she wasn't because she knew she had always 19201
paid her bills on time. 20201
          Ms. Manuel told them, I need a payment I can 21201
afford, and I want a fixed interest rate.  She told them she 22201
was on Social Security and received only $541 a month.  They 23201
told her she was getting the lowest interest rate and that 24201
her monthly payments would be $120. 25201
          So what loan did she get?  Well, this loan was a 1202
HELOC, a home equity line of credit.  The loan amount 2202
25,000.  The loan proceeds paid off almost $20,000 in third 3202
party unsecured debt.  She received about $3,000 in cash 4202
proceeds and was charged more than $2,200 in closing costs. 5202
          Unbeknownst to Ms. Manuel, the interest rate was 6202
not fixed, but adjustable.  The loan had an initial teaser 7202
rate of 3.875% for the first month.  Beginning in the second 8202
month, the interest rate was set at prime plus two 9202
percentage points.  Prime then was four points. 10202
          According to the terms of the note, the first ten 11202
years is the draw period and the monthly payments are 12202
interest only.  The remaining ten years is the repayment 13202
period, during which her mortgage payments will 14202
substantially increase.  The interest rate and monthly 15202
payments have increased dramatically over the past two 16202
years, with the increase of the prime rate.  Her initial 17202
monthly payment was about $100.  But it's more than doubled 18202
to the current payment of $215.  Now, who is the lender? 19202
The lender is IndyMack Bank, a federal savings bank. 20202
          Now, how is this loan underwritten?  Although she 21202
told them she was getting only $541 per month in Social 22202
Security, the loan application in the lender's file falsely 23202
states that her monthly income was 1100 in Social Security. 24202
IndyMack -- I got a copy of the loan file from the lender. 25202
IndyMack Bank issued a conditional approval letter -- 1203
approval notice to the mortgage broker. 2203
          Among the conditions was an instruction that the 3203
mortgage broker obtain a copy of the Social Security letter 4203
with the income blacked out.  In the lender's loan file is a 5203
copy of a Social Security award letter with the income, 6203
indeed, blacked out.  IndyMack didn't just ignore the 7203
information about her actual income, it actively instructed 8203
that the information be concealed. 9203
          This loan never should have been made.  No lender 10203
should make an ARM, much less an exploding ARM to someone on 11203
a fixed income.  Given her FICO score of 703, no lender 12203
should have charged her an interest rate of prime plus two. 13203
No lender should have done a no doc loan or stated income 14203
loan to someone on a fixed income, especially when the 15203
source and amount of her income can be easily documented. 16203
          Finally, no lender should instruct the mortgage 17203
broker or anyone to black out or mark out the proof the 18203
borrower's income.  And although the lender was very careful 19203
not to document her actual income but was careful to 20203
document the value of her home with the home's evaluated at 21203
84,000, this lender knew that when she inevitably defaulted 22203
on the loan, it could proceed with foreclosure and profit 23203
enormously.  She's struggling to pay her ever increasing 24203
mortgage payments, facing possible foreclosure, the loss of 25203
her home, and all the equity in it. 1204
          She wanted you to hear her story today because 2204
she's upset about what happened.  She's never been in this 3204
situation before.  She's worked hard her whole life, always 4204
paid her bills on time, and has never faced the possible 5204
loss of her home. 6204
          We're going to do everything we can to make sure 7204
she doesn't lose her home.  We're here today to ask that you 8204
do everything you can, including using your authority under 9204
section 1639 to prevent other lenders from doing the same 10204
thing that IndyMack did to Ms. Manuel. 11204
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you. 12204
          MS. BROWN:  Thank you for this opportunity to let 13204
her story be told. 14204
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you.  Okay.  Ms. Ashby? 15204
          MS. ASHBY:  Thank you, Madam Chair.  Good 16204
afternoon.  My name is Adrienne Ashby.  I'm an attorney with 17204
the Senior Citizens Law Project at Atlanta Legal Aid 18204
Society.  I have with me today my client, Ms. Agnes Martin. 19204
          Ms. Agnes Martin is a 76-year-old senior citizen 20204
who is disabled.  Her only source of income is from Social 21204
Security.  She's a foster mother, and she has custody of her 22204
seven-year-old grandson.  Before Ms. Martin retired, she 23204
worked as a hotel maid.  Ms. Martin has owned her home in 24204
Forest Park, Georgia, for the last 27 years. 25204
          In November 2003, Ms. Martin took out a loan with 1205
Freemont Investment and Loan Company.  This mortgage loan 2205
refinanced a previous mortgage.  Ms. Martin took out this 3205
loan because she needed money to bury her father who had 4205
recently died.  Ms. Martin had cared for her ailing father 5205
for the past 21 years until his death in 2003. 6205
          Ms. Martin was referred to a mortgage broker.  She 7205
told the broker that her monthly income was only $904 from 8205
Social Security.  She also told the broker that she received 9205
$844 in foster care assistance payments for the two foster 10205
children in her home.  Ms. Martin made it clear to the 11205
broker that she wanted a fixed interest rate loan. 12205
          Unfortunately, Freemont did not give Ms. Martin 13205
the fixed rate mortgage that she wanted.  Instead, Ms. 14205
Martin received an adjustable rate loan in the amount 15205
$85,000.  Her starting interest rate was 8.3 percent.  The 16205
loan was structured so that Ms. Martin's interest rates 17205
would only increase, possibly to as high as 15.3 percent and 18205
would never go below the initial rate of 8.3 percent. 19205
          The loan proceeds paid off Ms. Martin's previous 20205
mortgage and paid off unsecured debt in the amount of 21205
$3,900.  Ms. Martin received five hundred -- excuse me -- 22205
$5,336.11 in cash proceeds from the loan.  She used this 23205
money to pay for her father's funeral and burial. 24205
          The initial monthly payments on this mortgage 25205
comprised 71 percent of Ms. Martin's monthly income.  After 1206
she paid her monthly mortgage, she had only $262.43 2206
remaining from which to pay her utilities, property taxes, 3206
homeowner's insurance, food, medicine, and other necessities 4206
for daily living.  After two years, Ms. Martin's monthly 5206
payments increased to $751, even though her monthly income 6206
was only $933 per month.  Ms. Martin's current monthly 7206
mortgage payment is $930.  This leaves Ms. Martin with $3 8206
each month after she's made her monthly mortgage payments. 9206
          In an attempt to make it look like Ms. Martin's 10206
income was higher than it actually was, the broker 11206
considered the foster care payments that Ms. Martin received 12206
as part of her monthly income, even though the lender knew 13206
that these payments were for the benefit of the foster 14206
children.  The lender also knew that Ms. Martin would only 15206
receive these foster care benefits until the children turned 16206
18 years old.  At the time Ms. Martin got her loan, the 17206
children were 12 and 15. 18206
          This loan should have never been made to Ms. 19206
Martin.  The lender showed utter disregard for Ms. Martin's 20206
ability to repay the loan.  Even under the initial interest 21206
rate, Ms. Martin's income was insufficient to keep up her 22206
monthly payments and to maintain her household.  Moreover, 23206
an adjustable rate loan should have never been given to 24206
someone living on a fixed income.  It was inevitable that 25206
Ms. Martin would default on her loan because her income 1207
would not keep pace with the increases in the amount of her 2207
monthly mortgage payment. 3207
          Ms. Martin is now two months and $1900 behind on 4207
her mortgage payment, and she worries every day about 5207
whether she'll be able to keep the home she has lived in for 6207
almost 30 years.  Ms. Martin is here today asking that you 7207
do everything in your power to require stricter underwriting 8207
standards for mortgage lenders so that what happened to Ms. 9207
Martin does not happen to anyone else.  Thank you. 10207
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you.  Ms. MacLeod? 11207
          MS. MACLEOD:  Good afternoon.  My name is Nancy 12207
MacLeod.  I'm a housing counselor, and I work with the Home 13207
Defense Program at the Atlanta Legal Aid Office in Decatur. 14207
I'm here to share my perspective with you because I may be 15207
the only housing counselor in attendance, and I feel like I 16207
have a unique perspective on consumer education and 17207
providing disclosures to potential borrowers. 18207
          Consumer education has been an effective tool in 19207
protecting senior homeowners who are considering a reverse 20207
mortgage, but it has not been as effective in protecting 21207
home buyers or in protecting homeowners who are considering 22207
whether or not to take out a home equity loan.  Consumer 23207
education works for reverse mortgages because there are 24207
relatively few loan products, the interest rates do not vary 25207
from lender to lender, the underwriting requirements are 1208
virtually the same from product to product, there are few 2208
costs that can vary, and reverse mortgage counseling is 3208
mandatory before a consumer can actually apply for the loan. 4208
          Counselor can show a senior homeowner the direct 5208
benefits and costs for each loan available on the market. 6208
The disclosures provided in the counseling session include 7208
the reverse mortgage analyses and the total annual loan cost 8208
disclosure, and they allow consumers to compare these 9208
products side by side.  So seniors leave that counseling 10208
session knowing which reverse mortgage product is their best 11208
option.  They're given information on how the loan will 12208
impact their financial situation, the long term effect on 13208
the equity left in the home, other financial alternatives, 14208
and their responsibility should they take the loan out. 15208
          Consumer education for first time home buyers is 16208
effective if you're trying to teach the basics of home 17208
ownership.  But it's not effective in teaching consumers how 18208
to evaluate a complex array of financing options.  Each 19208
lender has a different set of financing products, each with 20208
their own special pricing and underwriting standards.  Non- 21208
profit agencies are ill equipped to teach consumers how to 22208
evaluate this many loan products.  And consumers, many of 23208
which have less than a high school education, are ill 24208
equipped to make an informed decision when presented with so 25208
many different financing options. 1209
          Reverse mortgage counseling works because 2209
counselors have access to the underwriting guidelines for 3209
each loan product.  They have a Web-based software with -- 4209
that updates regularly for all loan products at their 5209
disposal, and they use the software to print out side by 6209
side comparisons of costs and benefits for the loans.  The 7209
borrower receives the information before they proceed with a 8209
lender if they decide to actually apply for the loan. 9209
          If you're seriously interested in protecting home 10209
buyers and homeowners from unscrupulous mortgage lenders and 11209
brokers, you might first consider reducing the number of 12209
purchase mortgages and home equity loan products on the 13209
market, prime and subprime.  For the loan products that are 14209
truly beneficial to consumers, standardize the underwriting 15209
requirements and then the allowable costs, return to the 16209
practice of lending to consumers based on their ability to 17209
pay during the term of the loan, and provide your housing 18209
counselors with a Web-based software that can access 19209
information from locally based lenders for their loan 20209
products and pricing.  And then consumers can use this 21209
information to provide the side by side comparisons for 22209
consumers. 23209
          Make consumer education mandatory.  I know that's 24209
controversial.  Or actually, make consumer education a 25209
normal step in the process of buying or refinancing a home. 1210
Under these circumstances, consumer education for forward 2210
mortgages could provide valued information. 3210
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much.  Okay. 4210
We'll bring the panel up.  Thank you all.  Richard Brown, 5210
William Vatavuk, Nicole Cotton, Dave Hall, Paula Harrison, 6210
and Stella Adams.  This is like boys on one side, girls on 7210
the other.  All right.  We'll start with Richard Brown. 8210
          MR. BROWN:  I want to thank the Federal Reserve -- 9210
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Please -- I'm sorry.  Introduce 10210
yourself when you start for the court reporter. 11210
          MR. BROWN:  Okay.  All right.  Yeah.  My name is 12210
Richard Brown, and I am -- I'm speaking on behalf of the 13210
Community Reinvestment Association of North Carolina.  I 14210
want to thank the Federal Reserve for having this and giving 15210
the community a chance to speak out on some of these issues. 16210
North Carolina has a group of seven that has come down -- 17210
driven down this morning to speak, and we have several 18210
people sitting here on the panel.  So I will lead, and then 19210
they will follow up on the various specifics.  I have a 20210
written statement that I want to read from. 21210
          But before I do that, one of the things that 22210
strikes me on the things I've heard here is that the 23210
disclosures are dealing with the benevolent lenders.  And 24210
then there's another set of lenders.  And part of what you 25210
will be hearing as it relates to consumers, at least in 1211
North Carolina, is that these lenders aren't benevolent.  In 2211
fact, what they are doing is actively going out and taking 3211
advantage of consumer after consumer.  And so let me start 4211
with my written statement with those thoughts in mind. 5211
          The Community Reinvestment Association, acronym 6211
known as CRANC, promotes social and financial justice 7211
through creative advocacy, television, and radio production. 8211
For the record, I am submitting our report, Paying More and 9211
Getting Less, an analysis of the 2004 mortgage lending in 10211
North Carolina.  Our key finding is that disproportionately 11211
there is a ratio of more than four to one African-Americans 12211
paying more interest in home loans than whites do in North 13211
Carolina.  This finding has also been reached by a number of 14211
other HMDA analysis. 15211
          We applaud the Federal Reserve for holding these 16211
hearings and for the chairman's position that while 17211
financial literacy and consumer awareness are important in 18211
preventing predatory lending.  However, it is a regulatory 19211
responsibility to ensure fair lending.  CRANC supports 20211
financial literacy through various means, and we continue to 21211
insist that more can be done through existing enforcement 22211
mechanisms and authority of the regulatory bodies. 23211
          Let me talk a little bit about an example.  In the 24211
recent years, popular adaptations of traditional mortgage 25211
loans varying in term as short of 15 or as long as 40 years 1212
are available.  The structure of these loans are -- have 2212
also grown more heterogeneous.  In fact, HMDA data's current 3212
structure encourages all loans of the same terms or -- is 4212
erroneous.  Only 72 percent of mortgages -- borrowers 5212
actually get 30-year fixed rate mortgages according to Wall 6212
Street Journal.  And that lower -- That number is actually 7212
even lower in western United States. 8212
          Adjustable rate mortgages are now a popular choice 9212
for many consumers, as are interest only products.  And many 10212
people are using what they call these pay option ARMs. 11212
Amortization varies in these products, as well.  Fixed rate 12212
interest only loans account for eight percent of loans 13212
according to UBS. 14212
          In many cases, interest only products bear balloon 15212
payments.  And in each case, HMDA data is insensitive to the 16212
presence of these types of products.  So let me get to the 17212
recommendations that CRANC would like to offer humbly to the 18212
Federal Reserve. 19212
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Is it possible that one of the 20212
other speakers will do that because you're -- 21212
          MR. BROWN:  I'm already out of time? 22212
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  -- out of time. 23212
          MR. BROWN:  Wow.  Okay.  All right.  Well, I 24212
will -- 25212
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  You can submit it for the record. 1213
          MR. BROWN:  Yes, I would like to submit those for 2213
the record.  Thank you. 3213
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much.  William 4213
Vatavuk? 5213
          MR. VATAVUK:  Good afternoon.  My name is William 6213
Vatavuk, and I've been working as an intern at the North 7213
Carolina Fair Housing Center this summer.  Economy.com 8213
estimates that at least one million homeowners will see 9213
their house payments double in the next two years.  Now, 10213
this study suggests that one in seven borrowers have 11213
recently taken out adjustable rate mortgages will have 12213
trouble making their payments. 13213
          According to your own study, many Americans are 14213
confused about the terms their adjustable rate home 15213
mortgages and underestimate the amount by which their loan 16213
payments could jump.  You report that 35 percent of people 17213
with adjustable rate mortgages don't know how much their 18213
rate could increase at any one time.  And 41 percent weren't 19213
sure of the maximum rate or payments they could face. 20213
          The study further found that people with low 21213
incomes and less education are more likely to be unsure of 22213
the terms of their mortgages.  The North Carolina Fair 23213
Housing Center has found that borrowers often believe that 24213
they are told by mortgage brokers -- We often hear borrowers 25213
say that they were not to worry about the terms of their 1214
adjustable rate mortgage because they'd be able to refinance 2214
before the adjustment hit.  But that isn't always possible 3214
for the borrowers we see who have heavy debt loads and 4214
little to negative equity in their homes. 5214
          Therefore, I encourage the board to use its power 6214
to regulate the mortgage market to create a suitability 7214
standard for mortgage brokers who are currently responsible 8214
for the origination of 70 percent of the mortgage loans but 9214
for whom there's no national guidance or standards. 10214
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you.  Nicole Cotton? 11214
          MS. COTTON:  Hello.  My name's Nicole Cotton. 12214
I've been working as a legal intern with the North Carolina 13214
Fair Housing Center this summer.  The North Carolina Fair 14214
Housing Center strongly believes that lowering the fee 15214
trigger to five percent is appropriate and necessary extra 16214
protection.  Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac adopted 17214
guidelines as early as 2000 stating that they would not 18214
purchase high cost loans with fees in excess of five 19214
percent. 20214
          Many major financial institutions in the industry 21214
have, therefore, recognized that loans with fees in excess 22214
of five percent are prone to abuses if not executed 23214
properly.  Ms. Bennett is one of our clients.  Ms. Bennett, 24214
one of our clients, was charged a one percent origination 25214
fee and three percent yield spread premium.  The center 1215
strongly urges the board to include yield spread premiums in 2215
the point and feature in the calculation.  Thank you. 3215
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much.  Dave Hall? 4215
          MR. HALL:  My name is Dave Hall.  I'm also a 5215
summer legal intern with North Carolina Fair Housing Center. 6215
And the North Carolina Fair Housing Center typically 7215
receives four to five inquiries a day related to loan 8215
default and delinquency.  Ms. Bennett is a typical -- is 9215
typical of the types of calls we receive. 10215
          Ms. Bennett originally had a fixed rate loan with 11215
First Union Bank in 1999.  At that time her interest rate 12215
was 7.875 percent.  Her payments were 725.07 per month.  Ms. 13215
Bennett sought to refinance her loan in August 2002 in order 14215
to take advantage of the lower interest rate environment and 15215
wanted a fixed rate loan. 16215
          According to the August 23, 2002, weekly survey by 17215
Freddie Mac, 30-year fixed rate loans were at 6.27 percent 18215
at the time she closed her loan.  Ms. Bennett, enticed by 19215
the mortgage broker, entered into a 327 ARM without 20215
understanding the consequences.  The mortgage broker 21215
received a $1600 YSP for placing her in this loan product. 22215
In 2005 when the loan reset, the same mortgage broker placed 23215
her in an ARM that adjusts on a monthly basis and the 24215
payments are creeping up at a rate that will soon be beyond 25215
her ability to pay. 1216
          Ms. Bennett has a credit score that would qualify 2216
as A credit, and she also has an excellent employment 3216
history.  She initially sought to reduce her house payments 4216
so that she could complete college and improve herself. 5216
Were it not for the mortgage broker who presented herself as 6216
a financial counselor, Ms. Bennett could have refinanced to 7216
a lower interest fixed rate mortgage with either First 8216
Union/Wachovia or the State Employees Credit Union. 9216
          She was totally unaware of her options throughout 10216
this process.  She kept referring to the mortgage broker as 11216
a counselor, saying I went to her for counseling, and this 12216
is what she told me to do.  The counselor made about three 13216
percent off each loan transaction half -- transaction, half 14216
of which were YSPs for placing her in these inappropriate 15216
products.  Thank you. 16216
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much.  Paula 17216
Harrison? 18216
          MS. HARRISON:  Good evening.  I'm Paula Harrison. 19216
I came down as a consumer with North Carolina Fair Housing. 20216
I contacted them regarding my loan but actually found relief 21216
through another entity.  But I have to ask the question, 22216
being a consumer, and I'd ask everyone in this room.  What 23216
would you do if you had eight hours to save your home?  I 24216
had to deal with that question because my journey into 25216
predatory lending started in 2001 when I refinanced from a 1217
comparable loan into a financial nightmare. 2217
          It took four years to rectify the situation. 3217
Going through the guidelines that I found through HUD, I 4217
actually contacted the lender at the time that I was laid 5217
off, and nothing was done.  At that point, I realized I was 6217
in tremendous problems because of the problems and 7217
understanding talking with another non-profit, identified my 8217
loan, based on excessive fees that that was the problem.  I 9217
had excessive fees, and that was what targeted into 10217
predatory lending. 11217
          After making a complaint with the North Carolina 12217
Banker Commission, that was the only reason my broker even 13217
talked with me -- my lender talked with me regarding 14217
reducing the rate.  They reduced the rate from 12 percent to 15217
11.5 percent.  Not understanding the nature of the loan, I 16217
contacted another entity, National Training Information Tech 17217
Center in Chicago who had an agreement with my particular 18217
lender. 19217
          After talking with -- And I asked the person I 20217
spoke with, I said, let me talk with the compliance manager 21217
myself.  At that point I gave all the findings through North 22217
Carolina Housing, all the non-profits that I found, and 23217
actually became my own advocate.  I feel that once you 24217
empower yourself, you can make a difference.  Everyone in 25217
this room can make a difference to these abuses that's 1218
happening. 2218
          After speaking with the compliance officer, he 3218
reduced the mortgage from 11.5 percent to 7.5, without an 4218
attorney, just a consumer who educated herself, not because 5218
I wasn't educated, not because I did all the steps that all 6218
financial books said you should do.  At that point dealing 7218
with that and to this predatory loan, the credit has been 8218
demolished because I had A-1 credit based on the Center for 9218
Responsible Lending at the time I took the loan.  And now 10218
I'm dealing with fighting a $13,000 balloon payment at the 11218
end that the broker found.  And actually, the company that I 12218
dealt with got 5,000 and then the broker got another 5,000. 13218
          So what protection does this committee, this panel 14218
have to do to protect the consumers?  So I ask the question 15218
again, what would you do if you had eight hours to save your 16218
home? 17218
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you.  Stella? 18218
          MS. ADAMS:  Every day consumers across this nation 19218
are facing tremendous obstacles.  Financial literacy is not 20218
the answer.  It's part of the solution, but it is not the 21218
panacea that all would have it.  Disclosures in and of 22218
themselves are not the answers.  In many cases the 23218
disclosures we have today are licenses to steal because if 24218
people don't understand the disclosures, they can't react. 25218
They don't know what they're signing away, and they're often 1219
signing away their rights. 2219
          It is critical that the Federal Reserve use its 3219
power to regulate and to put in place suitability standards. 4219
We have to stop piling on the responsibility on the 5219
borrowers to learn when the market changes every day.  And 6219
it is an unlevel playing field.  They are not equal players 7219
in the transaction.  The lender has the control.  It is not 8219
an equal situation where two people with equal knowledge sit 9219
down and negotiate.  It is an unfair -- They are at an 10219
unfair advantage. 11219
          Mortgage brokers are now originating the majority 12219
of loans in this country, and they are not a part of the 13219
transaction.  The lender can say, oh, we have the 14219
disclosures in here, and we asked for the information, and 15219
we can't help what the broker did.  And that doesn't help 16219
the borrower. 17219
          It's the -- The risk is covered on -- It's spread 18219
out amongst all the investors and the risk is covered for 19219
everyone but the consumer, and it's the responsibility of 20219
the Federal Reserve to manage the risk for the borrower, 21219
just as the markets are managing the risk for the investor. 22219
And how you can do that is to use your power to regulate the 23219
mortgage market, to put in place a suitability standard, and 24219
to put in place safeguards that protect the consumer from an 25219
unfair burden of risk.  We thank you for allowing us to come 1220
and speak to you today. 2220
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much for making 3220
the trip.  Thank you to everybody.  And Larry Cherry?  Is he 4220
here?  Okay.  And Derrick Bozeman?  Mr. Cherry, would you 5220
like to go first? 6220
          MR. CHERRY:  My name is Larry Cherry.  I came all 7220
the way from Chicago because I didn't hear about them when 8220
they were in Chicago.  But I thought it was important.  I'm 9220
with the organization called the University of Life Itself. 10220
          And I've seen both parts because I was a former 11220
real estate broker, and I owned a mortgage company, and I 12220
invested in a lot of property.  When I realized that I was 13220
buying a lot of property that were being foreclosed, I 14220
stopped buying property and I set up a not-for-profit 15220
organization.  And since that time, we've been instrumental 16220
in saving hundreds of houses from foreclosure. 17220
          The problem is something we haven't talked about 18220
today.  The credit system really does not give borrowers a 19220
fair play and opportunity.  Since credit scoring has been 20220
introduced, many people who are people who have good income 21220
don't have the credit to be able to get the right type of 22220
interest rate, so they're paying 12 percent, 13 percent.  In 23220
addition, mortgage brokers get paid for charging a lot of 24220
interest.  The larger they charge interest the more yield 25220
service premium they get. 1221
          So the Federal Reserve, who is in control of all 2221
the money, certainly has the power to influence the credit 3221
system so that people who are poor borrowers and low income 4221
borrowers don't lose their homes simply because they had a 5221
credit -- a telephone, cellular phone, and their credit is 6221
low because they had a contract cancel or because they had a 7221
medical bill and now they're in a whole other rating.  Seven 8221
years that they're punished with bad credit because they 9221
didn't have any money in the first place. 10221
          So it's kind of a system that implodes on itself 11221
and punishes those individuals who have the least.  And for 12221
minor infractions, I now throw into loans that cause a lot 13221
of problems.  In addition to predatory lending, a whole 14221
other process of predatory foreclosures is introduced when 15221
you have foreclosure mill attorneys that are doing 16221
everything they can, illegally in many cases, to take away 17221
the rights of borrowers as they move with their home. 18221
          In Chicago and most judicial states, you can 19221
actually buy a house for 50,000 or 100,000, pay for it for 20221
15 years, owe 20,000.  Your house is improved to 150,000, 21221
and you can lose the house.  And the lender gets to keep all 22221
the money, the house, and sell it and make all the profit. 23221
How can that be fair? 24221
          So you know, it's a time to wake up and realize 25221
that we have a lot to change in the system.  The credit 1222
system needs to be changed totally around.  Credit scoring 2222
does not work.  It's arbitrary.  People who are making 3222
50,000 a year, if they only have one credit card that they 4222
800 on that's a $1,000 limit can have a score reduced 30 5222
points.  So the credit system doesn't even take into 6222
consideration because they don't even know how much money 7222
the person is making.  So it's a computer model that really 8222
is totally unfair, and it's another way of discriminating 9222
against those who have the least. 10222
          So it's time to make a change in that, as well as 11222
in the entire foreclosure process where the laws allow 12222
foreclosure mill attorneys to get richer.  In Chicago, Cook 13222
County, over 100,000 foreclosures in the last six years, and 14222
most of them -- many of them were predatory loans where 15222
people have no rights.  There are probably less than 20 16222
attorneys in the whole state of Illinois who have any idea 17222
of how to defend a foreclosure victim.  So our organization 18222
is about training attorneys to begin to -- assist those 19222
attorneys to begin to learn some of the procedures involved 20222
in helping somebody who might be in foreclosure.  Thank you. 21222
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much.  Mr. 22222
Bozeman? 23222
          MR. BOZEMAN:  Thank you.  I'm Derrick Bozeman, a 24222
former member of the Atlanta City Council here in the city 25222
and served two terms, and I worked very closely with Senator 1223
Fort and the Atlanta Legal Aid.  And I wanted to just 2223
disabuse any notion of predatory lending has gone away in 3223
the state of Georgia. 4223
          In fact, when the new governor came in to make 5223
sure that the law that Senator Fort had worked so hard to 6223
author and had worked in response to what he was seeing from 7223
neighborhoods and constituents that we both serve, this 8223
governor made sure that what he did, Sonny Perdue, was to go 9223
to every bank in Georgia, it appeared, and got the senior 10223
most staff -- I mean, his chief operating officer was the 11223
highest ranking official at the local bank.  So you can -- 12223
What did you expect to come out of that kind of set up?  You 13223
expected every kind of consumer advocate entity essentially 14223
to be gutted.  You would have thought that there would have 15223
been a greater sensitivity. 16223
          Let me just say this.  Predatory lending in its 17223
pernicious nature is very serious.  You've heard what some 18223
would say, well, these are just anecdotal inferences that 19223
the people you see, hopefully, an aberration of what really 20223
happens.  But no, they are the people who represents too 21223
many and too often of the folks that we see on a daily 22223
basis. 23223
          I just left a few minutes ago from a 60-story 24223
tower Bank of America building, two blocks up from this one. 25223
You know why I was there?  Because a church in south 1224
Atlanta, not too far from where I live, has a predatory loan 2224
-- had been extended -- a church, the house of God, the 3224
house of worship has a predatory loan.  What makes it 4224
predatory?  One, they did not have the ability to repay it. 5224
It was a loan that was extended to them by Bank of America, 6224
which basically called for them to make a $6,000 payment on 7224
a $1.5 million loan for the first three months.  Then it 8224
went up to $12,000, with a balloon payment of now 138,000 9224
after 15 years.  And so that's what's happening in Georgia 10224
today. 11224
          And so, if they will do it to a church after the 12224
legislation that Senator Fort put forth -- I also authored 13224
legislation because we know that all politics is local.  I 14224
authored legislation that even put in penalties when we 15224
found banks -- and these are main line banks that oftentimes 16224
do this -- engage in those practices that they couldn’t do 17224
business with the city of Atlanta where we deposit of 18224
hundreds of millions of the taxpayer's dollars. 19224
          It was in place every bit of two weeks before a 20224
general assembly put in place a preemption from local 21224
governments to put any kind of regulatory legislation in as 22224
it relates to banking.  So the Federal Reserve do have a 23224
responsibility.  You are the vanguard to keep these kinds of 24224
-- to regulate property because states have shown, if given 25224
an opportunity, certainly here in Georgia, what they will do 1225
everything that they can to help predatory lending flourish. 2225
We didn't run anybody out.  The people who should have been 3225
ran out are still here.  They're doing a disservice to this 4225
community, and it often explodes in the lives of people in 5225
very rare ways. 6225
          We've been able to reform some loans, but 7225
oftentimes it's after the hearse have driven that person to 8225
the cemetery.  They're still living under conditions of 9225
pressure and stress that oftentimes these loans put them 10225
under.  So we thank you for the opportunity to make a 11225
statement. 12225
          MS. BRAUNSTEIN:  Thank you very much.  And I'd 13225
like to thank everybody for today.  And I especially want to 14225
extend our deep appreciation to the Federal Reserve Bank of 15225
Atlanta and their staff, in particular, Joan Buchanan, Juan 16225
Sanchez, Jennifer Grier and everybody -- and Wayne Smith, 17225
and everybody else who helped make this happen today.  And 18225
with that, we are adjourned. 19225
          (Whereupon, the meeting was adjourned at 3:46 20225
p.m.) 21225
  22225
  23225
  24225
  25225
                      C E R T I F I C A T E 1226
  2226
  3226
STATE OF GEORGIA ) 4226
                 ) 5226
COUNTY OF FAYETTE) 6226
  7226
  8226
  9226
     I, CHARLENE M. HANSARD, being a Certified Court Reporter in 10226
  11226
and for the State of Georgia, do hereby certify that the 12226
  13226
foregoing transcript, consisting of 226 pages, was reduced to 14226
  15226
typewriting by me personally or under my direct supervision, and 16226
  17226
is a true, complete, and correct transcript of the aforesaid 18226
  19226
proceedings reported by me. 20226
  21226
     I further certify that I am not related to, employed by, 22226
  23226
counsel to, or attorney for any parties involved herein; nor am I 24226
  25226
financially interested in this matter. 26226
  27226
     This transcript is not deemed to be certified unless this 28226
  29226
certificate page is dated and signed by me. 30226
  31226
     WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this _____ day of 32226
  33226
____________, 2006. 34226
  35226
  36226
  37226
  38226
  39226
  40226
  41226
                              ____________________     _______ 42226
                              CHARLENE M. HANSARD, CCR-CVR 43226
                              CCR No. B-2341 44226
  45226
                              [SEAL] 46226
  47226
  48226
  49226
  50226

Nancy Lee & Associates, Atlanta, Georgia, 404-315-8305

Pages 1-25 | 26-50 | 51-75 | 76-100 | 101-125 | 126-150 | 151-175 | 176-200 | 201-226


2006 Hearings