International Finance Discussion Papers: Accessible versions of figures for 1424

Retail inventories and inflation dynamics: The price margin channel

Accessible version of figures


Figure 1: Illustration of a Retailer's Equilibrium

This graph illustrates a retailer's equilibrium using a two-dimensional plot. The x-axis represents the "Stock of goods, a" and the y-axis represents the "Price markup, μ". The graph contains three main curves:

  1. A downward-sloping blue line labeled "Pricing curve"
  2. An upward-sloping red line labeled "Stocking curve (ξ*)"
  3. A left shift in the upward-sloping pink line labeled "Stocking curve (ξ**)"
The blue pricing curve intersects with both stocking curves, creating two equilibrium points:
  1. The intersection with the red stocking curve (ξ*) is marked with a small black dot. This point corresponds to values a* on the x-axis and μ* on the y-axis.
  2. The intersection with the pink stocking curve (ξ**) is marked with another small black dot. This point corresponds to values a** on the x-axis (which is less than a*) and μ** on the y-axis (which is greater than μ*).

Dotted lines extend from these intersection points to their respective axis values for clarity. A note below the graph states: "This plot is illustrative. A finished-goods inventory model with a negatively sloped stocking curve would yield qualitatively similar implications."

This visualization demonstrates how changes in the stocking curve (from ξ* to ξ**) affect the equilibrium point, resulting in a lower stock of goods and a higher price markup.

Return to text.


Figure 2: Model Fit

The figure presents four panels, where all panels plot four-quarter inflation rate in percent between 2005q1 and 2025q1. In each panel, there are three lines. First, the black dashed line, labeled "Data", plots the data, which is goods PCE inflation for Panels A and B, and headline PCE inflation for Panels C and D. Second, the red dotted line, labeled "Canonical NKPC", plots the fitted inflation from estimating either the goods NKPC with specification (1) in Table 3 (Panels A and B), or the NKPC with specification (4) in Table 3 (Panels C and D). In detail, a canonical NKPC specification is with the current marginal cost, lagged inflation, and expected inflation as right-hand side variables. Third, the blue solid line, labeled "Stock-based NKPC", plots the fitted inflation from estimating either the goods NKPC with specification (3) in Table 3 (Panels A and B), or the NKPC with specification (6) in Table 3 (Panels C and D). In detail, a stock-based NKPC specification with the difference between expected future marginal cost and the current marginal cost, lagged inflation, expected inflation, and the inventory-sales ratio as right-hand side variables. Panels A and C use SPF expectations as the measure of expected inflation, whereas Panels C and D use Michigan expectations as the measure of expected inflation. In all panels, the focus is on two periods, the 2009-2011 missing disinflation period, and the 2021-22 COVID inflation period. In each panels, we see that the black dashed line is better tracked by the blue solid line than the red dashed line, suggesting that the stock-based NKPC fits the data better than the canonical NKPC, for both goods and headline PCE inflation, using either SPF or Michigan expectations.

Return to text.


Figure A.1: Breakdown of Purchasers' Value for PCE Goods

The figure breaks down the purchasers’ value for PCE goods in each year by four categories: the producers’ value in the black bar, the transportation cost in the dark-gray bar, the wholesale trade margin in the light-gray bar, and the retail trade margin in the white bar. The four bars are stacked and add up to 100 percent. The bars are shown for each year between 2007 and 2023. We observe that the producers’ value is about 50 to 60 percent of the purchasers’ value for PCE goods, followed by the retail trade margin which is about 30 to 40 percent of the purchasers’ value, with an increasing trend. The wholesale trade margin is about 10 percent, and transportation costs are small at around 1-2 percent. The main message of this figure is the large share of retail and wholesale trade margins in terms of purchasers’ value for PCE goods.

Return to text.


Figure D.1: Pseudo-out-of-sample Model Fit (One-quarter-ahead)

Similar in structure to Figure 2, the figure presents four panels, each plotting four-quarter inflation rate in percent between 2019q3 and 2025q3. As in Figure 2, the black dashed line is data, the red dashed line is canonical NKPC and the blue solid line is the stock-based NKPC. Panels A and B use goods PCE inflation as the data and fits the goods NKPC. Panels C and D use headline PCE inflation as the data and fits the headline NKPC. Panels A and C use SPF inflation expectations and Panels B and D use Michigan inflation expectations. Both the red dashed line and the blue solid line plot the one-quarter-ahead pseudo-out-of-sample forecast for inflation based on the fitted model. The message across all for panels is that the blue solid line fits the data better than the red dotted line, indicating that the stock-based NKPC better forecasts inflation during this period compared to forecasts based on the canonical NKPC.

Return to text.