Where Should Online Peer-to-Peer Markets Thrive?, Accessible Data
Accessible version of figures
Figure 1: Incidence of online P2P and offline alternative work, by Census Division
| Online P2P | Offline | |
|---|---|---|
| New England | 11.1% | 15.7% |
| Mid-Atlantic | 8.5% | 13.0% |
| South Atlantic | 11.1% | 11.3% |
| East-North Central | 10.5% | 16.7% |
| West-North Central | 11.6% | 18.1% |
| East-South Central | 8.2% | 18.2% |
| West-South Central | 12.4% | 13.3% |
| Mountain | 8.4% | 16.4% |
| Pacific | 11.8% | 12.8% |