en Nils Gornemann, Eugenio Rojas, Felipe Saffie

Does global financial risk affect long-run growth? Using a panel state-space model for emerging and advanced small open economies, we measure the effects of U.S. monetary policy uncertainty shocks. A one-standard-deviation shock lowers the level of the stochastic trend in emerging markets by at least 25 basis points after three years, with little effect in advanced economies. A small open economy model with growth through innovation and occasionally binding borrowing constraints explains this heterogeneity: higher interest-rate volatility depresses valuations, tightens collateral constraints, and slows innovation in equilibrium. A novel interaction between the occasionally binding constraint and stochastic volatility is key for our results.]]> IFDP Paper Johannes Fleck, Keith Richards

We show that the EU’s 2018 retaliation against US steel and aluminum tariffs targeted goods with low US import dependence and high substitutability. For the majority of tariffed goods, the US share of EU imports declined notably and remained below pre-2018 levels even after the retaliatory tariffs were lifted, reflecting asymmetric effects of tariffs on trade diversion. Moreover, although the retaliatory tariffs were instantly and fully passed through to EU importers, the retaliation did not lead to domestic price pressures as we find no evidence for inflationary effects on consumer and producer prices.]]> IFDP Paper Dario Caldara, Haroon Mumtaz, and Molin Zhong

We characterize asymmetric tail risk across over one hundred U.S. macroeconomic and financial variables using a dynamic factor model with stochastic volatility. The model unifies growth-at-risk, inflation-at-risk, and sectoral heterogeneity through common factors whose volatility responds endogenously to shocks, combined with heterogeneous factor loadings. We find that asymmetric tail risk is pervasive and heterogeneous: some sectors exhibit severe asymmetry while others show minimal asymmetry, with variation across activity, price, and financial variables. The framework disentangles supply- and demand-driven tail risk dynamics, revealing how the balance of risks shifts across episodes, and identifies where vulnerabilities concentrate across the economy.]]> IFDP Paper Danilo Cascaldi-Garcia and Matteo Iacoviello

We construct a news-based index of deregulation for the United States from 1960 through 2025 using AI to semantically classify newspaper articles. We distinguish articles discussing deregulation from those discussing increased regulation, assigning intensity scores that reflect both the centrality of deregulatory content and whether articles discuss advocacy, proposals, or enacted measures. Human validation confirms strong agreement between AI and human classifications. The deregulation index captures major reform episodes including transportation and telecommunications liberalization in the 1970s--1980s, financial deregulation in the 1980s-1990s, and recent deregulatory activity. We decompose the index by sector, type of deregulation, and policy stage. We validate the news-based index against a parallel index constructed using Federal Register documents: the news-based index leads the Federal Register index by nearly one year, consistent with media coverage reflecting policy intentions before formal implementation. Unlike measures based on detailed statutory coding or Federal Register counts that weigh all rules equally, our approach covers the entire economy and weighs naturally by newsworthiness, capturing regulatory shifts before they materialize in law. Positive shocks to deregulation boost investment, productivity, stock prices, profits, and GDP. Industry-specific deregulation shocks boost industry-level stock returns, consistent with our finding that deregulation involves measures that may impact incumbent profitability and operational efficiency more than competitive entry.]]> IFDP Paper Dario Caldara, Mike McHenry, Matteo Iacoviello, and Immo Schott

We study the investment effects of the Russia–Ukraine war using a novel, text-based measure of firm-level exposure derived from earnings call transcripts. Combining this measure with financial statement data for over 6,500 firms across 50 countries, we show that exposure to the conflict led to sizable and persistent declines in corporate investment. Firms that discussed the war in early 2022 invested significantly less than otherwise similar firms. The results hold across multiple empirical strategies and highlight the role of geopolitical risk in shaping firm behavior during global crises.]]> IFDP Paper Justin R. Pierce, Peter K. Schott, and Cristina J. Tello-Trillo

We find that US workers outside manufacturing exhibit relative earnings increases after US trade liberalization with China. These relative gains cumulate over time as the beneficial effect of a worker’s upstream exposure—increased competition from China in input markets—more than offsets the detrimental impact of her own and downstream (customer) exposures. These relative gains are smaller for non-manufacturing workers with less ex ante firm tenure and lower initial earnings, and are absent among manufacturing workers due to a lack of upstream gains and stronger downstream losses.]]> IFDP Paper Arpita Chatterjee, and Shengyu Li

This paper introduces a method for estimating productivity and quality at the firm-product level using a transformation function framework. We use firm optimization conditions to establish a one-to-one mapping between observed data and unobserved productivity and quality. We do not need to impute firm-product input shares and can avoid imposing productivity evolution processes. The method is scalable to numerous products and can address the bias caused by unobserved heterogeneous intermediate input prices. We apply the method to a set of Mexican manufacturing industries and examine the roles of across-firm and within-firm technological spillovers, accounting for the trade-off between productivity and quality. Our quantitative analysis shows that an exogenous, product-specific technological improvement generates substantial gains in welfare, amplified by both within-firm and across-firm spillovers by approximately 17 percent and 5 percent, respectively. Moreover, within-firm resource reallocation toward the most productive products accounts for 60 percent of the resulting firm-level productivity gains.]]> IFDP Paper Sergio Villalvazo

This paper studies the cross-sectional dimension of Fisher's debt-deflation mechanism that triggers endogenous Sudden Stop crises-i.e., episodes with large reversals in the current account. Analyzing microdata from Mexico, we show that this dimension has macroeconomic implications that operate via opposing effects. First, an amplifying effect by which households with high leverage fire-sale their assets during crises, increasing downward pressure on asset prices. Second, a dampening effect by which wealthy households with low leverage buy depressed assets, relieving downward pressure on asset prices. As a result, the role of inequality during crises is ambiguous. We conduct a quantitative analysis using a calibrated small open economy, asset-pricing model with heterogeneous agents and aggregate risk to measure the effects of inequality during crises. The model suggests that economies with lower inequality, whether due to reduced idiosyncratic risk or wealth redistribution across agents, experience less severe crises, as observed in the data.]]> IFDP Paper Judit Temesvary

We investigate how the U.S. dollar’s prominence in the denomination of international debt securities has evolved in recent decades, using a comprehensive global dataset with far more extensive coverage than datasets used in prior literature. We find no monotonic dollarization or de-dollarization trend; instead, the dollar’s share exhibits a wavelike pattern. We document three dollarization waves since the 1960s. The last wave, following the global financial crisis, lifted the dollar’s share nearly back to its level at the euro’s launch in 2000. Our findings are robust to composition and currency valuation effects as well as alternative data definitions.]]> IFDP Paper Momo Komatsu

During the energy crisis in 2022 some Euro Area countries introduced price caps on energy, while others did not, leading to about 30 percentage points higher energy inflation in uncapped countries. This paper investigates the trade-offs policymakers face with energy price caps in a two-country currency union model with shared energy supply. The cooperative, optimal outcome is for neither country to impose a price cap, since the cap is a costly market distortion. However, capping allows a country to avoid a crisis at the cost of negative spillovers on the uncapped country, characterized by high inflation and lower output. The quantitative model with non-homothetic preferences and substitutability of energy sources shows that the cost of the price cap exceeds the cost of such spillovers, explaining why some countries capped prices while others did not. Moreover, I show that the spillovers from price caps contributed to about 10 (0.5) percentage points of energy (headline) inflation in the uncapped Euro Area countries in 2022. Targeted transfers, an alternative policy to the price cap, is a cheaper and more effective way to boost consumption of the poor without creating divergence within the union.]]> IFDP Paper Ritt Keerati, and Jesse Schreger

We document a strong decoupling between the convenience yield on the US Dollar and US Treasuries. We measure the convenience of the U.S. dollar using covered interest parity (CIP) deviations between risk-free bank rates, such as secured overnight rates since the benchmark reform. In parallel, we measure the convenience of U.S. Treasury bonds through CIP deviations between government bond yields. We find a pronounced divergence between the two convenience measures in recent years: while the U.S. dollar exhibits strong convenience post-Global Financial Crisis, the U.S. Treasury convenience has not only declined substantially but has turned negative, most strongly so at medium- to long-term maturities. We argue that the relative supply of government bonds between the US and other developed markets is a key driver of the U.S. Treasury convenience compared to other government bonds. Finally, we present a simple framework with a constrained global financial intermediary to link dollar and Treasury convenience.]]> IFDP Paper François de Soyres, Simon Fuchs, Illenin O. Kondo, and Helene Maghin

We develop a framework to assess how economic shocks affect local labor markets and worker welfare, with a focus on city-level economic diversity. Using detailed worker flow data across cities, sectors, and occupations, we construct theory-consistent welfare measures. Our approach combines a dynamic discrete choice model with a dual representation that captures both direct effects and the insurance value of local economic diversity. Applied to French labor markets, we find that diversification dampens the effect of negative shocks: both job-to-job moves and net inflows decline less in diverse cities than in concentrated ones. Overall, we document sizable welfare insurance gains from local economic diversity.]]> IFDP Paper Sirio Aramonte

After the Global Financial Crisis, the liquidity-supply ecosystem that underpins nonbank intermediation shifted away from traditional dealers. Instead, it started to rely more on intermediaries with fragile funding structures and opportunistic investment strategies. Over the years, stress episodes saw the sudden retrenchment of these intermediaries, which amplified liquidity imbalances and market malfunction. Efforts to reduce the risk and magnitude of liquidity imbalances have mostly focused on reducing liquidity transformation and on constraining liquidity demand. This paper highlights the importance of strengthening liquidity supply in certain non-bank segments, particularly those that allow households to conduct long-term consumption smoothing. The main argument is that the rise of non-bank intermediation, and the ensuing risk of spikes in liquidity demand, partly reflects structural changes in how households can meet fundamental financial needs. In addition, the risk-taking channel of monetary policy can affect liquidity-demand dynamics, including for some intermediaries that facilitate household consumption smoothing.]]> IFDP Paper Hyunseung Oh, and Julio L. Ortiz

Using industry-level panel data and plausibly exogenous variation in supply conditions, we estimate the elasticity of retail price margins with respect to inventories along the retailer's optimal pricing curve. We find that this elasticity is negative and statistically significant, implying that lower finished-good inventories lead to higher price margins. We assess the implications of this channel for inflation dynamics within a New Keynesian Phillips curve (NKPC) framework that links inventories to retailers' markup behavior. Incorporating the inventory-sales ratio into the NKPC markedly improves the model's empirical fit and helps account for two notable recent inflation episodes: the missing disinflation of 2009–2011 and the COVID-era surge.]]> IFDP Paper Anushka Mitra

The unemployment rate remains elevated long after recessions, a persistence that standard search-and-matching models cannot explain. I show that noise shocks—expectational errors due to the noise in received signals about aggregate shocks—account for much of this sluggishness. Using a structural VAR, I find that absent noise shocks unemployment would have recovered to its pre-recession level six quarters earlier over 1968–2019. To interpret this evidence, I develop a search-and-matching model with on-the-job search, endogenous search effort, and wage rigidity. Embedding imperfect information generates two channels of persistence: slow learning amplifies the effects of persistent productivity shocks, and noise shocks provide an additional source of sluggishness, further magnified by sticky wages and vacancy posting. The model successfully replicates both the slow recovery of unemployment and systematic forecast errors, highlighting imperfect information as a key mechanism behind post-recession labor market dynamics.]]> IFDP Paper