Accessible Version
Advance release of table 1 of the Summary of Economic Projections to be released with the FOMC minutes
Percent
| Variable | Central tendency1 | Range2 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Longer run | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Longer run | |
| Change in real GDP | 2.2 to 2.3 | 2.8 to 3.2 | 3.0 to 3.4 | 2.5 to 3.2 | 2.2 to 2.4 | 2.2 to 2.4 | 2.2 to 3.3 | 2.2 to 3.6 | 2.1 to 3.5 | 1.8 to 2.5 |
| September projection | 2.0 to 2.3 | 2.9 to 3.1 | 3.0 to 3.5 | 2.5 to 3.3 | 2.2 to 2.5 | 1.8 to 2.4 | 2.2 to 3.3 | 2.2 to 3.7 | 2.2 to 3.5 | 2.1 to 2.5 |
| Unemployment rate | 7.0 to 7.1 | 6.3 to 6.6 | 5.8 to 6.1 | 5.3 to 5.8 | 5.2 to 5.8 | 7.0 to 7.1 | 6.2 to 6.7 | 5.5 to 6.2 | 5.0 to 6.0 | 5.2 to 6.0 |
| September projection | 7.1 to 7.3 | 6.4 to 6.8 | 5.9 to 6.2 | 5.4 to 5.9 | 5.2 to 5.8 | 6.9 to 7.3 | 6.2 to 6.9 | 5.3 to 6.3 | 5.2 to 6.0 | 5.2 to 6.0 |
| PCE inflation | 0.9 to 1.0 | 1.4 to 1.6 | 1.5 to 2.0 | 1.7 to 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.9 to 1.2 | 1.3 to 1.8 | 1.4 to 2.3 | 1.6 to 2.2 | 2.0 |
| September projection | 1.1 to 1.2 | 1.3 to 1.8 | 1.6 to 2.0 | 1.7 to 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 to 1.3 | 1.2 to 2.0 | 1.4 to 2.3 | 1.5 to 2.3 | 2.0 |
| Core PCE inflation3 | 1.1 to 1.2 | 1.4 to 1.6 | 1.6 to 2.0 | 1.8 to 2.0 | 1.1 to 1.2 | 1.3 to 1.8 | 1.5 to 2.3 | 1.6 to 2.2 | ||
| September projection | 1.2 to 1.3 | 1.5 to 1.7 | 1.7 to 2.0 | 1.9 to 2.0 | 1.2 to 1.4 | 1.4 to 2.0 | 1.6 to 2.3 | 1.7 to 2.3 | ||
1. The central tendency excludes the three highest and three lowest projections for each variable in each year. Return to table
2. The range for a variable in a given year includes all participants' projections, from lowest to highest, for that variable in that year. Return to table
3. Longer-run projections for core PCE inflation are not collected. Return to table
Figure 1. Central tendencies and ranges of economic projections, 2013-16 and over the longer run
Central tendencies and ranges of economic projections for years 2013 through 2016 and over the longer run. Actual values for years 2008 through 2012.
Change in real GDP
Percent
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Longer Run | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | (2.8) | (0.2) | 2.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Upper End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 2.4 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 2.5 |
| Upper End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 2.3 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 2.4 |
| Lower End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 2.2 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.2 |
| Lower End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.8 |
Unemployment rate
Percent
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Longer Run | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | 6.9 | 9.9 | 9.5 | 8.7 | 7.8 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Upper End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 7.1 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Upper End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 7.1 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Lower End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 7.0 | 6.3 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Lower End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 7.0 | 6.2 | 5.5 | 5.0 | 5.2 |
PCE inflation
Percent
| 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Longer Run | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Actual | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 1.7 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Upper End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 1.2 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| Upper End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 1.0 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Lower End of Central Tendency | - | - | - | - | - | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 2.0 |
| Lower End of Range | - | - | - | - | - | 0.9 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 2.0 |
Note: Definitions of variables are in the general note to the projections table. The data for the actual values of the variables are annual.
Figure 2. Overview of FOMC participants' assessments of appropriate monetary policy
Appropriate timing of policy firming
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of participants | 2 | 12 | 3 |
Note: In the upper panel, the height of each bar denotes the number of FOMC participants who judge that, under appropriate monetary policy, the first increase in the target federal funds rate from its current range of 0 to ¼ percent will occur in the specified calendar year. In September 2013, the numbers of FOMC participants who judged that the first increase in the target federal funds rate would occur in 2014, 2015, and 2016 were, respectively, 3, 12, and 2.
Appropriate pace of policy firming
Number of participants with projected targets
|
Target federal funds rate at year-end (Percent) |
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | Longer run |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | 17 | 15 | 3 | ||
| 0.50 | 3 | 1 | |||
| 0.75 | 1 | 4 | |||
| 1.00 | 2 | 1 | |||
| 1.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1.50 | 1 | 2 | |||
| 1.75 | 4 | ||||
| 2.00 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2.25 | |||||
| 2.50 | 2 | ||||
| 2.75 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3.00 | 1 | ||||
| 3.25 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3.50 | 4 | ||||
| 3.75 | 2 | ||||
| 4.00 | 1 | 9 | |||
| 4.25 | 1 | 2 |
Note: In the lower panel, each shaded circle indicates the value (rounded to the nearest ¼ percentage point) of an individual participant's judgment of the appropriate level of the target federal funds rate at the end of the specified calendar year or over the longer run.
