<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:cb="http://www.cbwiki.net/wiki/index.php/Specification_1.1" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# rdf.xsd">
  <channel rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/feeds/working_papers.xml">
    <title>FRB Working Papers</title>
    <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/workingpapers.htm</link>
    <description>Staff working papers in the Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS) and International Finance Discussion Papers (IFDPS) are preliminary materials circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The analysis and conclusions set forth are those of the authors and do not indicate concurrence by other members of the research staff or the Board of Governors. References in publications to the FEDS or IFDPS (other than acknowledgment) should be cleared with the author(s) to protect the tentative character of these papers.</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200947/200947abs.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200946/200946abs.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200945/200945abs.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/984/default.htm" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/983/default.htm" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/982/default.htm" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/981/default.htm" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/980/default.htm" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200944/200944abs.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200943/200943abs.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200941/200941abs.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200942/200942abs.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200940/200940abs.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200939/200939abs.html" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200938/200938abs.html" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200947/200947abs.html">


  <title>2009-47: Information Sharing and Stock Market Participation: Evidence from Extended Families</title>
  <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200947/200947abs.html</link>
  <description>Geng Li. Using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we document that, controlling for observable characteristics, household investors' likelihood of entering the stock market within the next five years is about 30 percent higher if their parents or children had entered the stock market during the previous five years. Because even family members who live far away from each other tend to communicate frequently, despite the fact that interactions among people living close geographically have declined with the rise of alternative social channels, we argue that these findings highlight the significance of information sharing regarding household financial decisions. In addition, focusing on the sequential patterns of stock market entry, we explicitly take into account the time needed for information to be shared and disseminated among family members. Our finding that one member's entry positively influences future entries of other family members at distinct stages of the life cycle allows us to largely rule out the hypothesis that the observed correlations in stock market entries are primarily caused by common preferences shared by family members. Furthermore, because we do not find similar sequential patterns in stock market exits, our results do not support the hypothesis of herding behavior.
</description>
  <dc:date>2009-11-16T15:49:32-05:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <cb:paper>
    <cb:simpleTitle>Information Sharing and Stock Market Participation: Evidence from Extended Families</cb:simpleTitle>
    <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-11-16T15:49:32-05:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
    <cb:keyword>Information sharing</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>stock market participation</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>extended families</cb:keyword>
    <cb:resource>
      <cb:title>2009-47: Information Sharing and Stock Market Participation: Evidence from Extended Families</cb:title>
      <cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200947/200947.pdf</cb:link>
      <cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
    </cb:resource>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Geng</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Li</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Geng Li</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:byline>Geng Li</cb:byline>
    <cb:publicationDate>2009-11-16T15:49:32-05:00</cb:publicationDate>

    <cb:issue>2009-47</cb:issue>
    <cb:JELCode>D14</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>D83</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>G11</cb:JELCode>
  </cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200946/200946abs.html">
  <title>2009-46: Firm Volatility and Banks:  Evidence from U.S. Banking Deregulation</title>
  <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200946/200946abs.html</link>
  <description>Ricardo Correa and Gustavo A. Suarez. This paper exploits the staggered timing of state-level banking deregulation in the United States during the 1980s to study the causal effect of banking integration on the volatility of non-financial corporations.  We find that firm-level employment, production, sales, and cash flows are less volatile after interstate banking deregulation, particularly for firms that have limited access to external finance.  This finding suggests that bank-dependent firms exploit wider access to finance after deregulation to smooth out idiosyncratic shocks.  In fact, short-term credit becomes less pro-cyclical after out-of-state bank entry is permitted.  Finally, lower volatility in real-side variables after deregulation translates into lower idiosyncratic risk in stock returns.
</description>
  <dc:date>2009-11-16T15:24:39-05:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <cb:paper>
    <cb:simpleTitle>Firm Volatility and Banks:  Evidence from U.S. Banking Deregulation</cb:simpleTitle>
    <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-11-16T15:24:39-05:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
    <cb:keyword>Bank deregulation</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>firm volatility</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>external finance</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>idiosyncratic volatility</cb:keyword>
    <cb:resource>
      <cb:title>2009-46: Firm Volatility and Banks:  Evidence from U.S. Banking Deregulation</cb:title>
      <cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200946/200946.pdf</cb:link>
      <cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
    </cb:resource>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Ricardo</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Correa</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Ricardo Correa</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Gustavo</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Suarez</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Gustavo Suarez</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:byline>Ricardo Correa and Gustavo A. Suarez</cb:byline>
    <cb:publicationDate>2009-11-16T15:24:39-05:00</cb:publicationDate>

    <cb:issue>2009-46</cb:issue>
    <cb:JELCode>G21</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>G32</cb:JELCode>
  </cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200945/200945abs.html">
  <title>2009-45: Household Response to the 2008 Tax Rebates: Survey Evidence and Aggregate Implications</title>
  <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200945/200945abs.html</link>
  <description>Claudia R. Sahm, Matthew D. Shapiro, and Joel Slemrod. Only about one-fifth of respondents in the Reuters/University of Michigan survey report that the 2008 tax rebates led them to mostly increase spending, while over half said it would lead them to mostly pay off debt.  Of those in the mostly-spend category, the response was swift, with over 80 percent reporting increasing their spending within three months of receiving their rebate.  Older households, households with higher wealth and higher income, and those expecting future income growth were generally more likely to spend the rebates.  A review of other surveys confirms the general pattern of results and suggests that small changes in survey design do not have a major effect on the distribution of responses.

The distribution of survey answers corresponds to an aggregate MPC after one year of about one-third.  The paper combines this survey-based estimate of the MPC and the survey-based estimate of the timing of spending to show that the rebates help explain the aggregate movements in saving, spending, and debt in 2008. Because the rebate was large and distributed over a short period, we estimate that it had a non-trivial effect on total spending in the second and third quarters of 2008.  Nonetheless, the results imply that the rebates provided only a modest stimulus to spending per dollar of rebate.
</description>
  <dc:date>2009-11-12T14:35:18-05:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <cb:paper>
    <cb:simpleTitle>Household Response to the 2008 Tax Rebates: Survey Evidence and Aggregate Implications</cb:simpleTitle>
    <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-11-12T14:35:18-05:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
    <cb:keyword>Tax rebates</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>marginal propensity to consume</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>survey responses</cb:keyword>
    <cb:resource>
      <cb:title>2009-45: Household Response to the 2008 Tax Rebates: Survey Evidence and Aggregate Implications</cb:title>
      <cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200945/200945.pdf</cb:link>
      <cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
    </cb:resource>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Claudia</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Sahm</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Claudia Sahm</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Matthew</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Shapiro</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Matthew Shapiro</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>University of Michigan and NBER</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Joel</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Slemrod</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Joel Slemrod</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>University of Michigan and NBER</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:byline>Claudia R. Sahm, Matthew D. Shapiro, and Joel Slemrod</cb:byline>
    <cb:publicationDate>2009-11-12T14:35:18-05:00</cb:publicationDate>

    <cb:issue>2009-45</cb:issue>
    <cb:JELCode>C83</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>E21</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>H31</cb:JELCode>
  </cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/984/default.htm">
<title>IFDP984:  Portfolio Inertia and the Equity Premium</title>
<link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/984/default.htm</link>
<description>Christopher Gust and David Lopez-Salido. We develop a DSGE model in which aggregate shocks induce endogenous movements in risk. The key feature of our model is that households rebalance their financial portfolio allocations infrequently, as they face a fixed cost of transferring cash across accounts. We show that the model can account for the mean returns on equity and the risk-free rate, and generates countercyclical movements in the equity premium that help explain the response of stock prices to monetary shocks. The model is consistent with empirical evidence documenting that unanticipated changes in monetary policy have important effects on equity prices through changes in risk. </description>
<dc:date>2009-11-10T12:27:54-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<cb:paper>
<cb:simpleTitle>Portfolio Inertia and the Equity Premium</cb:simpleTitle>
<cb:occurrenceDate>2009-11-09T15:09:30-04:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
<cb:institutionAbbrev>FRB</cb:institutionAbbrev>
<cb:keyword>Limited financial market participation</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>infrequent portfolio adjustment</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>equity premium</cb:keyword>
<cb:resource>
<cb:title>IFDP984:  Portfolio Inertia and the Equity Premium</cb:title>
<cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/984/ifdp984.pdf</cb:link>
<cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
</cb:resource>
<cb:byline>Christopher Gust and David Lopez-Salido</cb:byline>
<cb:publicationDate>2009-11-09T15:09:30-04:00</cb:publicationDate>
<cb:issue>984</cb:issue>
<cb:JELCode>E32</cb:JELCode>
<cb:JELCode>E44</cb:JELCode>
</cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/983/default.htm">
<title>IFDP983:  The Effects of Foreign Shocks When Interest Rates are at Zero</title>
<link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/983/default.htm</link>
<description>Martin Bodenstein, Christopher J. Erceg, and Luca Guerrieri. In a two-country DSGE model, the effects of foreign demand shocks on the home country are greatly amplified if the home economy is constrained by the zero lower bound for policy interest rates. This result applies even to countries that are relatively closed to trade such as the United States. The duration of the liquidity trap is determined endogenously. Adverse foreign shocks can extend the duration of the liquidity trap, implying more contractionary effects for the home country; conversely, large positive shocks can prompt an early exit, implying effects that are closer to those when the zero bound constraint is not binding.</description>
<dc:date>2009-11-10T12:27:54-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<cb:paper>
<cb:simpleTitle>The Effects of Foreign Shocks When Interest Rates are at Zero</cb:simpleTitle>
<cb:occurrenceDate>2009-11-03T12:11:33-04:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
<cb:institutionAbbrev>FRB</cb:institutionAbbrev>
<cb:keyword>Zero lower bound</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>spillover effects</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>DSGE models</cb:keyword>
<cb:resource>
<cb:title>IFDP983:  The Effects of Foreign Shocks When Interest Rates are at Zero</cb:title>
<cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/983/ifdp983.pdf</cb:link>
<cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
</cb:resource>
<cb:byline>Martin Bodenstein, Christopher J. Erceg, and Luca Guerrieri</cb:byline>
<cb:publicationDate>2009-11-03T12:11:33-04:00</cb:publicationDate>
<cb:issue>983</cb:issue>
<cb:JELCode>F32</cb:JELCode>
<cb:JELCode>F41</cb:JELCode>
</cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/982/default.htm">
<title>IFDP982:  The Market-Perceived Monetary Policy Rule</title>
<link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/982/default.htm</link>
<description>James D. Hamilton, Seth Pruitt, and Scott C. Borger. We introduce a novel method for estimating a monetary policy rule using macroeconomic news. Market forecasts of both economic conditions and monetary policy are affected by news, and our estimation links the two effects. This enables us to estimate directly the policy rule agents use to form their expectations, and in so doing flexibly capture the particular dynamics of policy response. We find evidence that between 1994 and 2007 the market-perceived Federal Reserve policy rule changed: the output response vanished, and the inflation response path became more gradual but larger in long-run magnitude. In a standard model we show that output smoothing caused by a larger inflation response magnitude is offset by the more measured pace of response. Our response coefficient estimates are robust to measurement and theoretical issues with both potential output and the inflation target. </description>
<dc:date>2009-11-10T12:27:54-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<cb:paper>
<cb:simpleTitle>The Market-Perceived Monetary Policy Rule</cb:simpleTitle>
<cb:occurrenceDate>2009-11-02T10:54:09-04:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
<cb:institutionAbbrev>FRB</cb:institutionAbbrev>
<cb:keyword>Monetary policy rule</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>market perceptions</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>Taylor Rule</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>Fed funds futures</cb:keyword>
<cb:resource>
<cb:title>IFDP982:  The Market-Perceived Monetary Policy Rule</cb:title>
<cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/982/ifdp982.pdf</cb:link>
<cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
</cb:resource>
<cb:byline>James D. Hamilton, Seth Pruitt, and Scott C. Borger</cb:byline>
<cb:publicationDate>2009-11-02T10:54:09-04:00</cb:publicationDate>
<cb:issue>982</cb:issue>
<cb:JELCode>E43</cb:JELCode>
<cb:JELCode>E52</cb:JELCode>
<cb:JELCode>E58</cb:JELCode>
</cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/981/default.htm">
<title>IFDP981:  Characteristic-Based Mean-Variance Portfolio Choice</title>
<link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/981/default.htm</link>
<description>Erik Hjalmarsson and Peter Manchev. We study empirical mean-variance optimization when the portfolio weights are restricted to be direct functions of underlying stock characteristics such as value and momentum. The closed-form solution to the portfolio weights estimator shows that the portfolio problem in this case reduces to a mean-variance analysis of assets with returns given by single-characteristic strategies (e.g., momentum or value). In an empirical application to international stock return indexes, we show that the direct approach to estimating portfolio weights clearly beats a naive regression-based approach that models the conditional mean. However, a portfolio based on equal weights of the single-characteristic strategies performs about as well, and sometimes better, than the direct estimation approach, highlighting again the difficulties in beating the equal-weighted case in mean-variance analysis. The empirical results also highlight the potential for `stock-picking' in international indexes, using characteristics such as value and momentum, with the characteristic-based portfolios obtaining Sharpe ratios approximately three times larger than the world market.</description>
<dc:date>2009-11-10T12:27:54-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<cb:paper>
<cb:simpleTitle>Characteristic-Based Mean-Variance Portfolio Choice</cb:simpleTitle>
<cb:occurrenceDate>2009-11-02T10:51:55-04:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
<cb:institutionAbbrev>FRB</cb:institutionAbbrev>
<cb:keyword>Mean-variance analysis</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>momentum strategies</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>portfolio choice</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>stock characteristics</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>value strategies</cb:keyword>
<cb:resource>
<cb:title>IFDP981:  Characteristic-Based Mean-Variance Portfolio Choice</cb:title>
<cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/981/ifdp981.pdf</cb:link>
<cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
</cb:resource>
<cb:byline>Erik Hjalmarsson and Peter Manchev</cb:byline>
<cb:publicationDate>2009-11-02T10:51:55-04:00</cb:publicationDate>
<cb:issue>981</cb:issue>
<cb:JELCode>C22</cb:JELCode>
<cb:JELCode>C23</cb:JELCode>
<cb:JELCode>G11</cb:JELCode>
<cb:JELCode>G15</cb:JELCode>
</cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/980/default.htm">
<title>IFDP980:  Rise of the Machines: Algorithmic Trading in the Foreign Exchange Market</title>
<link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/980/default.htm</link>
<description>Alain Chaboud, Benjamin Chiquoine, Erik Hjalmarsson, and Clara Vega. We study the impact that algorithmic trading, computers directly interfacing at high frequency with trading platforms, has had on price discovery and volatility in the foreign exchange market. Our dataset represents a majority of global interdealer trading in three major currency pairs in 2006 and 2007. Importantly, it contains precise observations of the size and the direction of the computer-generated and human-generated trades each minute. The empirical analysis provides several important insights. First, we find evidence that algorithmic trades tend to be correlated, suggesting that the algorithmic strategies used in the market are not as diverse as those used by non-algorithmic traders. Second, we find that, despite the apparent correlation of algorithmic trades, there is no evident causal relationship between algorithmic trading and increased exchange rate volatility. If anything, the presence of more algorithmic trading is associated with lower volatility. Third, we show that even though some algorithmic traders appear to restrict their activity in the minute following macroeconomic data releases, algorithmic traders increase their provision of liquidity over the hour following each release. Fourth, we find that non-algorithmic order flow accounts for a larger share of the variance in exchange rate returns than does algorithmic order flow. Fifth, we find evidence that supports the recent literature that proposes to depart from the prevalent assumption that liquidity providers in limit order books are passive.</description>
<dc:date>2009-11-10T12:27:54-04:00</dc:date>
<dc:language>en</dc:language>
<cb:paper>
<cb:simpleTitle>Rise of the Machines: Algorithmic Trading in the Foreign Exchange Market</cb:simpleTitle>
<cb:occurrenceDate>2009-11-02T10:49:12-04:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
<cb:institutionAbbrev>FRB</cb:institutionAbbrev>
<cb:keyword>Algorithmic trading</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>volatility</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>liquidity provision</cb:keyword>
<cb:keyword>private information</cb:keyword>
<cb:resource>
<cb:title>IFDP980:  Rise of the Machines: Algorithmic Trading in the Foreign Exchange Market</cb:title>
<cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/ifdp/2009/980/ifdp980.pdf</cb:link>
<cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
</cb:resource>
<cb:byline>Alain Chaboud, Benjamin Chiquoine, Erik Hjalmarsson, and Clara Vega</cb:byline>
<cb:publicationDate>2009-11-02T10:49:12-04:00</cb:publicationDate>
<cb:issue>980</cb:issue>
<cb:JELCode>F3</cb:JELCode>
<cb:JELCode>G12</cb:JELCode>
<cb:JELCode>G14</cb:JELCode>
<cb:JELCode>G15</cb:JELCode>
</cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200944/200944abs.html">
  <title>2009-44: Assessing the Systemic Risk of a Heterogeneous Portfolio of Banks During the Recent Financial Crisis</title>
  <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200944/200944abs.html</link>
  <description>Xin Huang, Hao Zhou, and Haibin Zhu. This paper extends the approach of measuring and stress-testing the systemic risk of a banking sector in Huang, Zhou, and Zhu (2009) to identifying various sources of financial instability and to allocating systemic risk to individual financial institutions. The systemic risk measure, defined as the insurance cost to protect against distressed losses in a banking system, is a risk-neutral concept of capital based on publicly available information that can be appropriately aggregated across different subsets. An application of our methodology to a portfolio of twenty-two major banks in Asia and the Pacific illustrates the dynamics of the spillover effects of the global financial crisis to the region. The increase in the perceived systemic risk, particularly after the failure of Lehman Brothers, was mainly driven by the heightened risk aversion and the squeezed liquidity. The analysis on the marginal contribution of individual banks to the systemic risk suggests that ``too-big-to-fail" is a valid concern from a macroprudential perspective of bank regulation.
</description>
  <dc:date>2009-11-02T10:05:47-05:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <cb:paper>
    <cb:simpleTitle>Assessing the Systemic Risk of a Heterogeneous Portfolio of Banks During the Recent Financial Crisis</cb:simpleTitle>
    <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-11-02T10:05:47-05:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
    <cb:keyword>Systemic risk</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>macroprudential regulation</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>portfolio distress loss</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>credit default swap</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>dynamic conditional correlation</cb:keyword>
    <cb:resource>
      <cb:title>2009-44: Assessing the Systemic Risk of a Heterogeneous Portfolio of Banks During the Recent Financial Crisis</cb:title>
      <cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200944/200944.pdf</cb:link>
      <cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
    </cb:resource>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Xin</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Huang</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Xin Huang</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Department of Economics, University of Oklahoma</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Hao</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Zhou</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Hao Zhou</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Risk Analysis Section, Federal Reserve Board</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Haibin</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Zhu</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Haibin Zhu</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Bank for International Settlements, Asia-Pacific Office</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:byline>Xin Huang, Hao Zhou, and Haibin Zhu</cb:byline>
    <cb:publicationDate>2009-11-02T10:05:47-05:00</cb:publicationDate>

    <cb:issue>2009-44</cb:issue>
    <cb:JELCode>G21</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>G28</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>G13</cb:JELCode>
  </cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200943/200943abs.html">
  <title>2009-43: Designing Loan Modifications to Address the Mortgage Crisis and the Making Home Affordable Program</title>
  <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200943/200943abs.html</link>
  <description>Larry Cordell, Karen Dynan, Andreas Lehnert, Nellie Liang, and Eileen Mauskopf. Delinquencies on residential mortgages and home foreclosures have risen dramatically in the past couple of years. The mortgage losses triggered a broad-based financial crisis and severe recession, which, in turn, exacerbated the initial financial distress faced by homeowners. Although servicers increased their loss mitigation efforts as defaults began to mount, foreclosures continued to occur in cases where both the borrower and investor would be better off if such an outcome were avoided.  The U.S. government has engaged in a number of initiatives to reduce such foreclosures.  This paper examines the economic underpinnings of the Administration's loan modification program, the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP).  We argue that HAMP should help many borrowers avoid foreclosure, as its key features--a standardized protocol, incentive fees for servicers, and a requirement that the first lien mortgage payment be reduced to 31 percent of gross income--alleviate some of the previous obstacles to successful modifications.  That said, HAMP is not well-suited to address payment problems associated with job loss because the required modification in such cases would often be too costly to qualify for the program.  In addition, the focus of the program on reducing the payments associated with the mortgage rather than the principal of the mortgage may limit its effectiveness when the homeowner's equity is sufficiently negative.  In this case, recent government efforts to establish a protocol for short sales should be a useful tool in avoiding costly foreclosure.
</description>
  <dc:date>2009-10-27T18:15:57-05:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <cb:paper>
    <cb:simpleTitle>Designing Loan Modifications to Address the Mortgage Crisis and the Making Home Affordable Program</cb:simpleTitle>
    <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-10-27T18:15:57-05:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
    <cb:keyword>Mortgage</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>mortgage-servicers</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>mortgage-modification</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>foreclosures</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>HAMP</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>GSEs</cb:keyword>
    <cb:resource>
      <cb:title>2009-43: Designing Loan Modifications to Address the Mortgage Crisis and the Making Home Affordable Program</cb:title>
      <cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200943/200943.pdf</cb:link>
      <cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
    </cb:resource>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Larry</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Cordell</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Larry Cordell</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Karen</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Dynan</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Karen Dynan</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Brookings Institute</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Andreas</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Lehnert</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Andreas Lehnert</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Nellie</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Liang</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Nellie Liang</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Eileen</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Mauskopf</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Eileen Mauskopf</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:byline>Larry Cordell, Karen Dynan, Andreas Lehnert, Nellie Liang, and Eileen Mauskopf</cb:byline>
    <cb:publicationDate>2009-10-27T18:15:57-05:00</cb:publicationDate>

    <cb:issue>2009-43</cb:issue>
    <cb:JELCode>G01</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>G21</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>G28</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>H40</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>H20</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>H00</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>H81</cb:JELCode>
  </cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200941/200941abs.html">
  <title>2009-41: Education's Role in China's Structural Transformation</title>
  <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200941/200941abs.html</link>
  <description>Soohyung Lee and Benjamin A. Malin. We explore education's role in improving the allocation of labor between China's agricultural and nonagricultural sectors and measure the portion of China's recent growth attributable to this channel.  Building from micro-level estimates, we find that education's impact on labor reallocation between sectors accounts for about 9 percent of Chinese growth, whereas its impact on within-sector human capital growth explains only 2 percent.  Our findings suggest that, when frictions cause large productivity gaps across sectors and returns to education are greater in higher-productivity sectors, education policy may be a useful tool for increasing efficiency.
</description>
  <dc:date>2009-10-27T09:54:15-05:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <cb:paper>
    <cb:simpleTitle>Education's Role in China's Structural Transformation</cb:simpleTitle>
    <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-10-27T09:54:15-05:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
    <cb:keyword>Returns to education</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>structural transformation</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>China</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>labor reallocation</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>economic growth</cb:keyword>
    <cb:resource>
      <cb:title>2009-41: Education's Role in China's Structural Transformation</cb:title>
      <cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200941/200941.pdf</cb:link>
      <cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
    </cb:resource>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Soohyung</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Lee</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Soohyung Lee</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>University of Maryland and MPRC</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Benjamin</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Malin</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Benjamin Malin</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:byline>Soohyung Lee and Benjamin A. Malin</cb:byline>
    <cb:publicationDate>2009-10-27T09:54:15-05:00</cb:publicationDate>

    <cb:issue>2009-41</cb:issue>
    <cb:JELCode>O1</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>O5</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>I2</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>J6</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>N3</cb:JELCode>
  </cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200942/200942abs.html">
  <title>2009-42: Reversing the Trend: The Recent Expansion of the Reverse Mortgage Market</title>
  <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200942/200942abs.html</link>
  <description>Hui Shan. Reverse mortgages allow elderly homeowners to tap into their housing wealth without having to sell or move out of their homes. However, very few eligible homeowners have used reverse mortgages to achieve consumption smoothing until recently when the reverse mortgage market in the United States witnessed substantial growth. This paper examines 1989-2007 loan-level reverse mortgage data and presents a number of findings. First, I show that recent reverse mortgage borrowers are significantly different from earlier borrowers in many respects. Second, I find that borrowers who take the line-of-credit payment plan, single male borrowers, and borrowers with higher house values exit their homes sooner than other reverse mortgage borrowers. Third, I combine the reverse mortgage data with county-level house price data to show that elderly homeowners are more likely to purchase reverse mortgages when the local housing market is at its peak. This finding suggests that the 2000-05 housing market boom may be partially responsible for the rapid growth of reverse mortgage markets. Lastly, I show that the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage limits, which cap the amount of housing wealth that an eligible homeowner can borrow against, have no effect on the demand for reverse mortgages. The findings have important implications to both policy-making and the economics of housing and aging.
</description>
  <dc:date>2009-10-19T18:15:08-05:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <cb:paper>
    <cb:simpleTitle>Reversing the Trend: The Recent Expansion of the Reverse Mortgage Market</cb:simpleTitle>
    <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-10-19T18:15:08-05:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
    <cb:keyword>Reverse mortgages</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>housing</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>aging</cb:keyword>
    <cb:resource>
      <cb:title>2009-42: Reversing the Trend: The Recent Expansion of the Reverse Mortgage Market</cb:title>
      <cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200942/200942.pdf</cb:link>
      <cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
    </cb:resource>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Hui</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Shan</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Hui Shan</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:byline>Hui Shan</cb:byline>
    <cb:publicationDate>2009-10-19T18:15:08-05:00</cb:publicationDate>

    <cb:issue>2009-42</cb:issue>
    <cb:JELCode>E21</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>J14</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>R21</cb:JELCode>
  </cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200940/200940abs.html">
  <title>2009-40: Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Volatility Models with Levy Jumps: Application to Risk Analysis</title>
  <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200940/200940abs.html</link>
  <description>Pawel J. Szerszen. In this paper I analyze a broad class of continuous-time jump diffusion models of asset returns. In the models, stochastic volatility can arise either from a diffusion part, or a jump part, or both. The jump component includes either compound Poisson or Levy alpha-stable jumps. To be able to estimate the models with latent Levy alpha-stable jumps, I construct a new Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. I estimate all model specifications with S&amp;P500 daily returns. I find that models with Levy alpha-stable jumps perform well in capturing return characteristics if diffusion is a source of stochastic volatility. Models with stochastic volatility from jumps and models with Poisson jumps cannot represent excess kurtosis and tails of return distribution. In density forecast and VaR analysis, the model with Levy alpha-stable jumps and joint stochastic volatility performs the best among all other specifications, since both diffusion and infinite activity jump part provide information about latent volatility.
</description>
  <dc:date>2009-10-14T16:28:47-05:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <cb:paper>
    <cb:simpleTitle>Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Volatility Models with Levy Jumps: Application to Risk Analysis</cb:simpleTitle>
    <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-10-14T16:28:47-05:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
    <cb:keyword>Bayesian estimation</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>stochastic volatility</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>Levy Jumps</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>density forecast</cb:keyword>
    <cb:resource>
      <cb:title>2009-40: Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Volatility Models with Levy Jumps: Application to Risk Analysis</cb:title>
      <cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200940/200940.pdf</cb:link>
      <cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
    </cb:resource>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Pawel</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Szerszen</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Pawel Szerszen</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:byline>Pawel J. Szerszen</cb:byline>
    <cb:publicationDate>2009-10-14T16:28:47-05:00</cb:publicationDate>

    <cb:issue>2009-40</cb:issue>
    <cb:JELCode>C1</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>C11</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>G1</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>G12</cb:JELCode>
  </cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200939/200939abs.html">
  <title>2009-39: Credit Card Redlining Revisited</title>
  <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200939/200939abs.html</link>
  <description>Kenneth P. Brevoort. Using a proprietary dataset of credit bureau records, Cohen-Cole (2008) finds that banks set credit limits on revolving accounts based in part on the racial composition of the neighborhood in which each borrower resides.  This paper evaluates the evidence presented in that working paper using the same proprietary database of credit bureau records.  The replication effort presented in this paper suggests that decisions about how to calculate the variables used in that study may have resulted in the unnecessary exclusion of one-fifth of available observations from the estimation samples and may have increased the size of the reported effect by over 25 percent.  Furthermore, this analysis suggests that when a control for neighborhood income is added to the estimations, the results presented as evidence of redlining activities disappear.
</description>
  <dc:date>2009-10-14T16:28:34-05:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <cb:paper>
    <cb:simpleTitle>Credit Card Redlining Revisited</cb:simpleTitle>
    <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-10-14T16:28:34-05:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
    <cb:keyword>Credit cards</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>redlining</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>racial disparities</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>discrimination</cb:keyword>
    <cb:resource>
      <cb:title>2009-39: Credit Card Redlining Revisited</cb:title>
      <cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200939/200939.pdf</cb:link>
      <cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
    </cb:resource>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Kenneth</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Brevoort</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Kenneth Brevoort</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:byline>Kenneth P. Brevoort</cb:byline>
    <cb:publicationDate>2009-10-14T16:28:34-05:00</cb:publicationDate>

    <cb:issue>2009-39</cb:issue>
    <cb:JELCode>J15</cb:JELCode>
    <cb:JELCode>G21</cb:JELCode>
  </cb:paper>
</item>
  <item rdf:about="http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200938/200938abs.html">
  <title>2009-38: Intergenerational Aspects of Health Care</title>
  <link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200938/200938abs.html</link>
  <description>Louise Sheiner. The physical process of aging means that the use of health services varies significantly by age. This association between age and health care consumption raises a number of issues related to intergenerational and intragenerational equity, including the allocation of societal resources across age groups and the effects of population aging and health cost growth on public sector health care burdens and, hence, on intergenerational redistribution. This working paper (forthcoming as a chapter in the Oxford Handbook of Health Economics) provides a detailed look at the theoretical and empirical relationships between health spending and age, both in the US and internationally, and reviews the evidence on the intergenerational redistribution associated with public health spending over time.
</description>
  <dc:date>2009-10-14T16:28:24-05:00</dc:date>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
  <cb:paper>
    <cb:simpleTitle>Intergenerational Aspects of Health Care</cb:simpleTitle>
    <cb:occurrenceDate>2009-10-14T16:28:24-05:00</cb:occurrenceDate>
    <cb:keyword>Health</cb:keyword>
    <cb:keyword>demographics</cb:keyword>
    <cb:resource>
      <cb:title>2009-38: Intergenerational Aspects of Health Care</cb:title>
      <cb:link>http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2009/200938/200938.pdf</cb:link>
      <cb:description>PDF version</cb:description>
    </cb:resource>
    <cb:person type="author">
      <cb:givenName>Louise</cb:givenName>
      <cb:surname>Sheiner</cb:surname>
      <cb:nameAsWritten>Louise Sheiner</cb:nameAsWritten>
      <cb:role>
        <cb:affiliation>Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System</cb:affiliation>
      </cb:role>
    </cb:person>
    <cb:byline>Louise Sheiner</cb:byline>
    <cb:publicationDate>2009-10-14T16:28:24-05:00</cb:publicationDate>

    <cb:issue>2009-38</cb:issue>
    <cb:JELCode>I1</cb:JELCode>
  </cb:paper>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
