Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS)
September 2025 (Revised November 2025)
Does Financial Stress Affect Commodity Futures Traders' Positions?
Shengwu Du, Travis D. Nesmith, and Yang Heppe
Abstract:
Financial stress can impact trading behavior in the U.S. commodity futures markets. To clarify the impact, we study absolute changes and relative exposure dynamics in traders' positions during two recent crises: the 2008 Global Financial Crisis (GFC) and the COVID-19 pandemic. The nature of these two crises are very distinct, and we find that traders behaved quite differently. The commodity market collapse during the 2008 GFC followed the classic pattern of a speculative bubble; speculators, including financial institutions and money managers, rushed to close their long positions in commodity futures while commodity producers or hedgers actively facilitated these trades. Consequently, the risk in commodity futures markets flowed from speculators back to producers. In sharp contrast, no evidence is found to support this type of risk flow during the COVID-19 crisis. Stress in the financial system was relatively mild compared with the 2008 GFC, and the commodity market experienced a strong rally early in the crisis. Both speculators and hedgers traded in an orderly fashion. In terms of traders' relative exposures, we find that the impact from financial stress was immaterial. We also find that speculators generally reacted to changing financial conditions more strongly than hedgers, during the period.
Keywords: Commodities, Futures, Financial Stability, Market Volatility, COVID-19, 2008 GFC
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2025.082r1
PDF: Full Paper
Original Paper: PDF | Accessible materials (.zip)
Disclaimer: The economic research that is linked from this page represents the views of the authors and does not indicate concurrence either by other members of the Board's staff or by the Board of Governors. The economic research and their conclusions are often preliminary and are circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The Board values having a staff that conducts research on a wide range of economic topics and that explores a diverse array of perspectives on those topics. The resulting conversations in academia, the economic policy community, and the broader public are important to sharpening our collective thinking.