Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS)
September 2025
Non-homothetic Demand Shifts and Inflation Inequality
Abstract:
This paper shows that adverse macroeconomic shocks systematically increase inflation for low-income households relative to high-income households. I document two key facts: (i) during every U.S. recession since 1959, aggregate spending shifts toward products disproportionately purchased by low-income households (necessities); and (ii) relative prices of necessities rise during recessions. These patterns can be explained by a model with non-homothetic demand and a concave production possibility frontier: shocks that reduce expenditure induce households to reallocate spending from luxuries to necessities, raising their relative prices. I empirically show that this mechanism operates for both demand and supply shocks, using monetary policy and oil price news shocks. Incorporating this mechanism into a quantitative model reproduces most of the variation in necessity prices and shares from 1961 to 2024. The model shows that the fall in expenditure due to a recessionary shock similar to the Great Recession leads inflation to increase by more than 1.5 percentage points for low-income households relative to high-income households. The results suggest that low-income households are hit twice by adverse shocks: once by the shock itself and again as their price index increases relative to that of other households.
Keywords: inflation, non-homotheticity, real income inequality, business cycle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2025.085
PDF: Full Paper
Related Materials: Accessible materials (.zip)
Disclaimer: The economic research that is linked from this page represents the views of the authors and does not indicate concurrence either by other members of the Board's staff or by the Board of Governors. The economic research and their conclusions are often preliminary and are circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The Board values having a staff that conducts research on a wide range of economic topics and that explores a diverse array of perspectives on those topics. The resulting conversations in academia, the economic policy community, and the broader public are important to sharpening our collective thinking.