Accessible Version

Figure 1: Real GDP Growth in EMEs

Quarterly
4-quarter percent change

Period China Brazil Mexico EME aggregate* Emerging Asia ex. China*
2005:Q1 11.10 4.09 3.63 6.57 5.41
2005:Q2 11.10 4.44 2.35 6.79 6.03
2005:Q3 10.80 2.12 3.44 6.70 6.04
2005:Q4 12.40 2.17 3.57 7.40 6.72
2006:Q1 12.50 4.25 4.71 7.89 7.27
2006:Q2 13.70 2.25 6.13 7.54 5.95
2006:Q3 12.20 4.53 5.29 7.88 6.78
2006:Q4 12.50 4.79 3.87 7.77 6.55
2007:Q1 13.80 5.15 3.17 8.10 6.72
2007:Q2 15.00 6.54 2.86 8.64 7.44
2007:Q3 14.30 5.92 2.99 8.43 6.93
2007:Q4 13.90 6.63 3.51 8.87 7.73
2008:Q1 11.50 6.14 2.59 7.96 6.77
2008:Q2 10.90 6.32 2.03 7.24 5.73
2008:Q3 9.50 7.07 1.40 6.16 4.27
2008:Q4 7.10 0.97 -1.27 2.09 0.12
2009:Q1 6.40 -2.25 -5.28 -0.17 -1.61
2009:Q2 8.20 -2.20 -6.68 0.56 0.56
2009:Q3 10.60 -1.26 -4.68 2.45 2.67
2009:Q4 11.90 5.34 -1.22 6.00 6.47
2010:Q1 12.20 9.04 4.13 8.84 9.93
2010:Q2 10.80 8.50 6.59 8.71 9.16
2010:Q3 9.90 7.02 5.39 7.66 8.06
2010:Q4 9.90 5.76 4.43 7.74 7.74
2011:Q1 10.20 5.02 4.16 7.41 7.12
2011:Q2 10.00 4.73 3.66 6.81 5.43
2011:Q3 9.40 3.62 4.19 6.38 4.53
2011:Q4 8.80 2.65 4.18 5.54 3.74
2012:Q1 8.10 1.53 3.86 5.35 3.92
2012:Q2 7.60 1.02 4.55 4.96 4.20
2012:Q3 7.50 2.61 3.30 5.14 4.86
2012:Q4 8.10 2.55 3.44 5.19 5.28
2013:Q1 7.90 2.45 3.15 4.80 4.16
2013:Q2 7.60 4.06 0.68 5.12 4.62
2013:Q3 7.90 2.88 1.59 5.20 4.72
2013:Q4 7.70 2.64 1.04 5.05 4.76
2014:Q1 7.40 3.25 1.11 4.87 4.60
2014:Q2 7.50 -0.37 3.01 4.69 5.10
2014:Q3 7.10 -0.55 2.31 4.40 5.16
2014:Q4 7.20 -0.23 2.66 4.34 4.59
2015:Q1 7.00 -1.94 2.76 4.11 4.87
2015:Q2 7.00 -2.96 2.64 3.84 4.43
2015:Q3 6.90 -4.51 2.76 3.69 4.48
2015:Q4 6.80 -5.70 2.46 3.42 4.60
2016:Q1 6.70 -5.47 2.29 3.62 4.95
2016:Q2 6.70 -3.61 1.53 3.62 4.91
2016:Q3 6.70 -2.84 2.00 3.65 4.62
2016:Q4 6.80 -2.41 2.33 3.87 4.65
2017:Q1 6.90 -0.41 2.55 4.10 4.54
2017:Q2 6.90 0.23 3.03 4.38 4.33

Note: GDP is gross domestic product; EME is emerging market economies.

* Aggregates are nominal GDP-weighted; countries included are Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China, Colombia, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, the Philippines, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Venezuela. Return to table

Source: Haver Analytics; Federal Reserve Board staff estimates.

Figure 2: Net Quarterly Private Flows to Major Emerging Markets

Quarterly
Percent of GDP

Period Major emerging markets* Major emerging markets excluding China
2006:Q1 2.3 1.6
2006:Q2 3.1 2.9
2006:Q3 0.2 0.5
2006:Q4 1.8 2.5
2007:Q1 4.4 4.0
2007:Q2 6.2 6.1
2007:Q3 2.5 2.9
2007:Q4 2.9 5.1
2008:Q1 4.2 3.6
2008:Q2 3.3 4.1
2008:Q3 1.2 1.5
2008:Q4 -5.8 -6.5
2009:Q1 -0.4 -1.3
2009:Q2 3.1 1.3
2009:Q3 3.9 4.9
2009:Q4 4.3 4.0
2010:Q1 3.5 2.8
2010:Q2 3.4 3.4
2010:Q3 3.5 4.2
2010:Q4 5.3 3.6
2011:Q1 4.3 3.5
2011:Q2 5.0 4.4
2011:Q3 1.9 1.0
2011:Q4 -0.1 0.6
2012:Q1 2.0 1.9
2012:Q2 0.9 2.0
2012:Q3 0.5 2.4
2012:Q4 1.8 2.7
2013:Q1 3.2 2.6
2013:Q2 1.2 1.3
2013:Q3 1.5 0.4
2013:Q4 3.2 1.5
2014:Q1 1.0 -0.5
2014:Q2 0.3 1.5
2014:Q3 0.5 1.9
2014:Q4 -0.8 0.3
2015:Q1 -1.4 0.2
2015:Q2 -0.3 1.0
2015:Q3 -2.3 0.0
2015:Q4 -2.8 -0.5
2016:Q1 -2.0 0.3
2016:Q2 -0.1 1.4
2016:Q3 -1.9 0.7
2016:Q4 -1.6 0.3
2017:Q1 1.4 1.5

Note: GDP is gross domestic product. Net private inflows include net foreign direct investment, portfolio, and other flows excluding International Monetary Fund (IMF) lending.

* Countries included: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China (except where indicated), Colombia, Czech Republic, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey. Return to table

Source: IMF, Balance of Payments.

Figure 3: Flows to Dedicated Emerging Market Funds

Quarterly
Billions of dollars

Period Flows to dedicated emerging market funds 4-quarter moving average
2006:Q1 27.1 11.5
2006:Q2 -7.5 9.6
2006:Q3 -1.7 6.3
2006:Q4 10.5 7.1
2007:Q1 0.6 0.5
2007:Q2 5.6 3.8
2007:Q3 15.5 8.1
2007:Q4 23.1 11.2
2008:Q1 -19.5 6.2
2008:Q2 8.0 6.8
2008:Q3 -24.9 -3.3
2008:Q4 0.0 -9.1
2009:Q1 -1.0 -4.5
2009:Q2 27.6 0.4
2009:Q3 15.2 10.5
2009:Q4 31.0 18.2
2010:Q1 15.4 22.3
2010:Q2 19.2 20.2
2010:Q3 41.1 26.6
2010:Q4 43.5 29.8
2011:Q1 -18.0 21.4
2011:Q2 20.4 21.7
2011:Q3 -18.5 6.9
2011:Q4 -10.3 -6.6
2012:Q1 32.9 6.2
2012:Q2 -4.8 -0.2
2012:Q3 18.4 9.1
2012:Q4 43.5 22.5
2013:Q1 43.5 25.2
2013:Q2 -28.7 19.2
2013:Q3 -17.2 10.3
2013:Q4 -25.2 -6.9
2014:Q1 -49.4 -30.1
2014:Q2 24.2 -16.9
2014:Q3 27.7 -5.7
2014:Q4 -26.1 -5.9
2015:Q1 -10.5 3.8
2015:Q2 2.5 -1.6
2015:Q3 -59.6 -23.4
2015:Q4 -20.9 -22.1
2016:Q1 -6.9 -21.2
2016:Q2 -2.2 -22.4
2016:Q3 47.3 4.3
2016:Q4 -19.2 4.8
2017:Q1 29.1 13.8
2017:Q2 48.1 26.3
2017:Q3 32.1 22.5

Note: Includes flows to dedicated EM equity and bond funds, including global, regional, and country funds.

Source: EPFR Global.

Figure 4: Emerging Market Equities and Credit Spreads

Series: MSCI* and EMBI global bond spreads
Horizon: January 2014 to October 2, 2017
Description: The data are weekly averages of daily data and are plotted as two curves. Units for the EMBI global bond spread are in basis points, and the MSCI is indexed with January 9, 2008 = 100.

In early 2014, there is a sizable drop in the EMBI spreads, bottoming out in late June 2014 at around 275 basis points. It then increases until January 2015, reaching over 450 basis points. The spreads then decrease to around 375 basis points by mid-2015 before rising sharply to 460 basis points in September 2015. In October 2015, EMBI global bond spreads decrease sharply, followed shortly by a rapid increase, peaking around 525 basis points in March 2016. Since March 2016, spreads have fallen at a fairly constant pace to their October 2, 2017, value of just above 300 basis points.

MSCI experienced a constant increase in the first two-thirds of 2014, rising from around 90 in January to near 100 by October. As MSCI is indexed with January 9, 2008 = 100, this reveals that the MSCI was around the same level in October 2014 as it was in January 2008. With minor decreases and increases, the MSCI remains fairly constant around 100 until March 2015. From March to May 2015, the index rises to near 105 before starting a steady decline, cratering just above 80 in January 2016. From January 2016 to October 2, 2017, the index increases at a steady pace, exempting the period from July 2016 to January 2017, when it was constant at around 95. By October 2, 2017, the MSCI has reached nearly 115, the highest level in the range of this figure.

* Emerging Market Local Currency Stock Index. Return to text

Source: Bloomberg Finance LP.

Figure 5: Contributions to Net Private Inflows to Major EMEs ex. China

Percent of GDP, annual rate

Period Growth difference Commodity prices Monetary policy Risk sentiment Intercepts Actual flows Predicted flows
2004 0.4 0.6 1.6 -3.0 1.9    
Q1           2.0 2.4
Q2           -0.1 2.1
Q3           0.4 1.6
Q4           3.9 1.6
2005 0.4 0.6 1.0 -2.3 1.9    
Q1           2.2 3.2
Q2           2.3 2.5
Q3           1.1 2.6
Q4           1.3 1.6
2006 0.5 0.4 0.5 -1.4 1.9    
Q1           1.6 2.7
Q2           2.9 3.0
Q3           0.5 2.7
Q4           2.5 1.4
2007 0.5 0.5 0.8 -1.4 1.9    
Q1           4.0 2.8
Q2           6.1 3.8
Q3           2.9 3.9
Q4           5.1 3.7
2008 0.6 -0.2 2.1 -2.8 1.9    
Q1           3.6 4.7
Q2           4.1 4.7
Q3           1.5 2.9
Q4           -6.5 -2.9
2009 0.0 -0.1 1.6 -3.9 1.9    
Q1           -1.3 -3.6
Q2           1.3 0.7
Q3           4.9 1.9
Q4           4.0 2.8
2010 0.6 0.5 1.2 -2.2 1.9    
Q1           2.8 2.7
Q2           3.4 2.1
Q3           4.2 2.0
Q4           3.6 3.3
2011 0.3 0.4 1.5 -2.2 1.9    
Q1           3.5 3.2
Q2           4.4 2.8
Q3           1.0 2.2
Q4           0.6 0.5
2012 0.2 -0.1 1.4 -2.3 1.8    
Q1           1.9 1.3
Q2           2.0 0.8
Q3           2.4 1.5
Q4           2.7 1.8
2013 0.2 0.0 1.3 -1.9 1.8    
Q1           2.6 2.0
Q2           1.3 1.3
Q3           0.4 2.0
Q4           1.5 1.4
2014 -0.1 -0.4 1.5 -2.0 1.8    
Q1           -0.5 2.0
Q2           1.5 1.6
Q3           1.9 1.4
Q4           0.3 0.4
2015 -0.2 -1.1 0.8 -2.3 1.9    
Q1           0.2 -0.8
Q2           1.0 1.3
Q3           0.0 0.2
Q4           -0.5 -0.1
2016:Q1 -0.1 -1.2 0.8 -2.7 1.9 0.3 -0.4
2016:Q2 -0.1 0.8 1.1 -2.4 1.9 1.4 2.3
2016:Q3 -0.1 0.3 1.2 -2.2 1.9 0.7 1.9
2016:Q4 -0.1 0.6 1.2 -2.1 1.9 0.3 1.9
2017:Q1 -0.1 0.6 1.1 -2.0 1.9 1.5 1.8

Note: EMEs are emerging market economies; GDP is gross domestic product. Countries included are Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Czech Republic, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Turkey.

Source: International Monetary Fund; Haver Analytics; Federal Reserve Board staff estimates.

Figure 6: Emerging Market Vulnerabilities and Credit Spreads

Series: Emerging Market Economies Vulnerability Index (13 EMEs)* and EMBI global spread**
Horizon: 1995:Q1 to 2017:Q3
Description: The EMBI global spreads data are quarterly averages of daily data. The units for the EMBI global bond spread are basis points.

The EMBI global spread is at its maximum in 1995:Q1, at nearly 1,400 basis points. It decreases sharply until 1997:Q2, where it reaches a local minimum of just below 400. It then increases sharply and constantly until 1998:Q3, where it is back to nearly 1,200 basis points. From 1998:Q3 to 1999:Q2, it falls down below 1,000 basis points. In 1999:Q3, it ticks back up above 1,000 before falling again through 2000:Q2, descending to around 625 basis points. From 2000:Q2 to 2001:Q3, the spreads increase back to nearly 900 before sharply falling the next quarter back to around 625 and increasing back to 850 in 2002:Q3. From 2002:Q3 to 2007:Q1, the spreads decline, sharply at first and less sharply over time. In 2007, it reaches its minimum in the 1995 to 2017 range of just below 200 basis points. Following 2007:Q2, the EMBI spreads sharply increase to around 750 basis points by 2008:Q4 before declining sharply back down to 300 basis points in 2009:Q4. Through 2010 and up to 2011:Q2, the spreads remain fairly constant before a modest increase to 400 basis points in 2011:Q3. The spreads remain near 400 basis points through 2012:Q2 before declining to near 275 basis points in 2013:Q1. The spreads increase modestly until 2016:Q1, with only a small decrease in 2014:Q1. In 2016:Q1, the EMBI global spreads reach back above 400 for the first time since 2011:Q4 and their highest since 2009:Q2. Since 2016:Q1, EMBI spreads have decreased constantly until the end of the available data in 2017:Q3, reaching down to just above 300 basis points.

The EME vulnerability index tracks the EMBI global spread fairly closely. The index is only calculated yearly and shown from 1995 to 2016, unlike the EMBI spreads, which are shown quarterly. In 1995, the vulnerability index is at its maximum value of 3.5. In 1996, it decreases to 3.3, representing an improvement in vulnerability, and in 1997 it declines further to 2.7. In 1998, it holds constant at 2.7, but in 1999 and 2000 it declines further to 2.5 and 2.2, respectively. In 2001, it holds constant at 2.2, and in 2002 and 2003 it declines, leaving the index at 1.8 in 2003. The vulnerability index remains constant at 1.8 until 2007, when it drops further to 1.5. In 2008, the index reaches its lowest value of 1.3 before rising back to 1.8 in 2009 and 2.0 in 2010. The index falls to 1.8 in 2011 but promptly increases again in 2012 and 2013, reaching 2.3 by 2013. There is another small decrease in 2014, bringing the index back down to 2.0, but the index climbs back to 2.2 in 2015 and 2.3 in 2016. This line reveals that the index has declined substantially from the late 1990s, reached a minimum in 2008, and has since climbed back to levels in 2013 and 2016 not seen since 1999.

Note: Countries included are Brazil, China, Chile, Colombia, Indonesia, India, Malaysia, Mexico, the Philippines, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, and Turkey.

* Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on 6 indicators for 13 emerging market economies (EMEs): current account/gross domestic product (GDP), gross government debt/GDP, average inflation, increase in bank credit to the private sector/GDP, reserves/GDP, and total external debt/exports. Vulnerability score can range from a low of 1 (all variables for all countries falling in bottom 5th percentile of historical experience) to a high of 5 (all variables for all countries falling in the top 5th percentile). Return to text

** Before 1998, backcasted using EMBI+ and Brady bond spreads. Return to text

Source: Bloomberg Finance LP; Federal Reserve Board staff estimates.

Figure 7: Emerging Market Nonfinancial Corporate Debt

Quarterly
Percent of GDP

Period China EME* EME Ex. China
2007:Q1 102.04    
2007:Q2 102.62    
2007:Q3 101.53    
2007:Q4 98.70    
2008:Q1 99.33 58.92 41.50
2008:Q2 98.79 58.76 41.19
2008:Q3 98.52 60.30 41.81
2008:Q4 98.08 63.48 43.94
2009:Q1 109.38 69.41 45.27
2009:Q2 117.38 70.50 44.46
2009:Q3 120.13 71.66 45.34
2009:Q4 120.48 71.61 45.21
2010:Q1 121.68 71.27 44.25
2010:Q2 123.00 72.36 43.80
2010:Q3 122.85 71.65 43.67
2010:Q4 122.17 71.76 43.84
2011:Q1 122.49 71.38 43.30
2011:Q2 121.99 71.35 43.20
2011:Q3 120.65 73.97 43.98
2011:Q4 121.63 75.20 44.29
2012:Q1 124.67 75.36 43.90
2012:Q2 126.86 78.12 45.06
2012:Q3 129.44 78.63 44.82
2012:Q4 131.85 80.29 45.44
2013:Q1 137.08 83.00 46.07
2013:Q2 139.35 86.15 47.03
2013:Q3 141.71 88.36 48.16
2013:Q4 142.19 89.59 48.69
2014:Q1 146.40 90.98 48.90
2014:Q2 149.46 92.03 49.08
2014:Q3 149.89 94.55 49.59
2014:Q4 151.62 98.08 51.12
2015:Q1 155.27 101.46 51.52
2015:Q2 157.29 102.49 51.59
2015:Q3 159.77 106.23 52.52
2015:Q4 164.54 109.22 53.37
2016:Q1 167.88 109.76 53.13
2016:Q2 168.64 108.86 52.49
2016:Q3 168.17 108.34 52.37
2016:Q4 168.27 107.94 51.51
2017:Q1 167.51 106.42 51.01

Note: GDP is gross domestic product.

* Emerging market economies (EME) include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China (including Hong Kong), Hungary, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, and Turkey. Return to table

** Asian financial crisis is GDP-weighted average of Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand in 1996: 98.64 percent of GDP.

Source: Bank for International Settlements; Federal Reserve Board staff estimates.

Figure 8: Emerging Market Nonfinancial Corporate Debt at Risk

4-quarter moving average
Percent of GDP

Period EME Ex. China China EME*
2007:Q1   20.06  
2007:Q2   17.05  
2007:Q3   13.81  
2007:Q4   13.31  
2008:Q1   12.70  
2008:Q2   12.14  
2008:Q3   13.35  
2008:Q4 8.58 15.99 10.47
2009:Q1 9.46 21.05 12.58
2009:Q2 10.38 25.56 14.77
2009:Q3 10.95 27.03 15.81
2009:Q4 11.20 25.88 15.85
2010:Q1 10.90 21.24 14.51
2010:Q2 10.29 16.55 12.85
2010:Q3 9.42 12.82 11.37
2010:Q4 8.66 12.03 10.62
2011:Q1 8.18 11.97 10.30
2011:Q2 7.77 12.32 10.00
2011:Q3 8.22 12.68 10.56
2011:Q4 8.22 14.05 11.03
2012:Q1 8.50 16.90 12.01
2012:Q2 9.09 22.35 14.16
2012:Q3 9.27 26.20 15.35
2012:Q4 9.69 28.93 16.68
2013:Q1 9.97 31.02 17.73
2013:Q2 10.25 30.26 18.10
2013:Q3 10.68 31.40 19.12
2013:Q4 11.06 31.50 19.75
2014:Q1 11.13 32.27 20.38
2014:Q2 11.06 33.16 20.67
2014:Q3 10.75 34.15 20.92
2014:Q4 10.85 35.82 21.83
2015:Q1 11.03 38.41 23.34
2015:Q2 11.20 40.25 24.54
2015:Q3 11.54 43.22 26.42
2015:Q4 11.44 47.63 28.44
2016:Q1 11.51 50.35 29.84
2016:Q2 11.22 54.41 31.53
2016:Q3 10.85 56.03 31.92
2016:Q4 10.33 54.06 30.66
2017:Q1 9.55 50.46 28.40

Note: Debt at risk is debt of firms with ratio of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization to interest expense less than 2. GDP is gross domestic product.

* Emerging market economies (EME) include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China (including Hong Kong), Hungary, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, and Turkey. Return to table

** Asian financial crisis is GDP-weighted average of Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand in 1996: 46.06 percent of GDP.

Source: Bank for International Settlements; Standard & Poor's Global Market Intelligence; Federal Reserve Board staff estimates.

Figure 9: Emerging Market Nonfinancial Corporate Debt at Risk, 2017:Q1

Percent of GDP

Region Current With 100 basis point increase in average borrowing cost With additional earnings and exchange rate depreciation shocks**
EME* 28.40 35.65 46.83
EME ex. China 9.55 12.04 17.49
China 50.46 64.26 82.75
South Korea 14.98 20.28 28.91
Turkey 18.40 19.36 25.11
India 16.64 19.57 24.75
Malaysia 9.03 11.24 22.88
Brazil 15.27 17.17 21.69
Chile 7.57 8.56 16.38
Thailand 3.82 9.82 12.91
Indonesia 4.31 5.16 11.29
Russia 6.48 6.91 8.64
Mexico 1.52 1.75 8.37
Argentina 5.66 5.69 7.84
Poland 3.53 5.40 6.92
South Africa 3.34 3.44 6.86
Hungary 0.55 0.55 0.57
Asian financial crisis*** 46.06    

Note: Debt at risk is debt of firms with ratio of earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization to interest expense less than 2. GDP is gross domestic product.

* Emerging market economies (EME) include Argentina, Brazil, Chile, China (including Hong Kong), Hungary, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Thailand, and Turkey. Return to table

** Shocks include a 20 percent fall in earnings and a 20 percent depreciation of the local currency against the dollar. Return to table

*** Asian financial crisis is GDP-weighted average of Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand in 1996. Return to table

Source: Ayala, Nedelijkovic, and Saborowski (2015); Bank for International Settlements; Standard & Poor's Global Market Intelligence; Federal Reserve Board staff estimates.

Figure 10: U.S. Federal Funds Rate

Monthly

Period Percent
January 1995 5.53
February 1995 5.92
March 1995 5.98
April 1995 6.05
May 1995 6.01
June 1995 6.00
July 1995 5.85
August 1995 5.74
September 1995 5.80
October 1995 5.76
November 1995 5.80
December 1995 5.60
January 1996 5.56
February 1996 5.22
March 1996 5.31
April 1996 5.22
May 1996 5.24
June 1996 5.27
July 1996 5.40
August 1996 5.22
September 1996 5.30
October 1996 5.24
November 1996 5.31
December 1996 5.29
January 1997 5.25
February 1997 5.19
March 1997 5.39
April 1997 5.51
May 1997 5.50
June 1997 5.56
July 1997 5.52
August 1997 5.54
September 1997 5.54
October 1997 5.50
November 1997 5.52
December 1997 5.50
January 1998 5.56
February 1998 5.51
March 1998 5.49
April 1998 5.45
May 1998 5.49
June 1998 5.56
July 1998 5.54
August 1998 5.55
September 1998 5.51
October 1998 5.07
November 1998 4.83
December 1998 4.68
January 1999 4.63
February 1999 4.76
March 1999 4.81
April 1999 4.74
May 1999 4.74
June 1999 4.76
July 1999 4.99
August 1999 5.07
September 1999 5.22
October 1999 5.20
November 1999 5.42
December 1999 5.30
January 2000 5.45
February 2000 5.73
March 2000 5.85
April 2000 6.02
May 2000 6.27
June 2000 6.53
July 2000 6.54
August 2000 6.50
September 2000 6.52
October 2000 6.51
November 2000 6.51
December 2000 6.40
January 2001 5.98
February 2001 5.49
March 2001 5.31
April 2001 4.80
May 2001 4.21
June 2001 3.97
July 2001 3.77
August 2001 3.65
September 2001 3.07
October 2001 2.49
November 2001 2.09
December 2001 1.82
January 2002 1.73
February 2002 1.74
March 2002 1.73
April 2002 1.75
May 2002 1.75
June 2002 1.75
July 2002 1.73
August 2002 1.74
September 2002 1.75
October 2002 1.75
November 2002 1.34
December 2002 1.24
January 2003 1.24
February 2003 1.26
March 2003 1.25
April 2003 1.26
May 2003 1.26
June 2003 1.22
July 2003 1.01
August 2003 1.03
September 2003 1.01
October 2003 1.01
November 2003 1.00
December 2003 0.98
January 2004 1.00
February 2004 1.01
March 2004 1.00
April 2004 1.00
May 2004 1.00
June 2004 1.03
July 2004 1.26
August 2004 1.43
September 2004 1.61
October 2004 1.76
November 2004 1.93
December 2004 2.16
January 2005 2.28
February 2005 2.50
March 2005 2.63
April 2005 2.79
May 2005 3.00
June 2005 3.04
July 2005 3.26
August 2005 3.50
September 2005 3.62
October 2005 3.78
November 2005 4.00
December 2005 4.16
January 2006 4.29
February 2006 4.49
March 2006 4.59
April 2006 4.79
May 2006 4.94
June 2006 4.99
July 2006 5.24
August 2006 5.25
September 2006 5.25
October 2006 5.25
November 2006 5.25
December 2006 5.24
January 2007 5.25
February 2007 5.26
March 2007 5.26
April 2007 5.25
May 2007 5.25
June 2007 5.25
July 2007 5.26
August 2007 5.02
September 2007 4.94
October 2007 4.76
November 2007 4.49
December 2007 4.24
January 2008 3.94
February 2008 2.98
March 2008 2.61
April 2008 2.28
May 2008 1.98
June 2008 2.00
July 2008 2.01
August 2008 2.00
September 2008 1.81
October 2008 0.97
November 2008 0.39
December 2008 0.16
January 2009 0.15
February 2009 0.22
March 2009 0.18
April 2009 0.15
May 2009 0.18
June 2009 0.21
July 2009 0.16
August 2009 0.16
September 2009 0.15
October 2009 0.12
November 2009 0.12
December 2009 0.12
January 2010 0.11
February 2010 0.13
March 2010 0.16
April 2010 0.20
May 2010 0.20
June 2010 0.18
July 2010 0.18
August 2010 0.19
September 2010 0.19
October 2010 0.19
November 2010 0.19
December 2010 0.18
January 2011 0.17
February 2011 0.16
March 2011 0.14
April 2011 0.10
May 2011 0.09
June 2011 0.09
July 2011 0.07
August 2011 0.10
September 2011 0.08
October 2011 0.07
November 2011 0.08
December 2011 0.07
January 2012 0.08
February 2012 0.10
March 2012 0.13
April 2012 0.14
May 2012 0.16
June 2012 0.16
July 2012 0.16
August 2012 0.13
September 2012 0.14
October 2012 0.16
November 2012 0.16
December 2012 0.16
January 2013 0.14
February 2013 0.15
March 2013 0.14
April 2013 0.15
May 2013 0.11
June 2013 0.09
July 2013 0.09
August 2013 0.08
September 2013 0.08
October 2013 0.09
November 2013 0.08
December 2013 0.09
January 2014 0.07
February 2014 0.07
March 2014 0.08
April 2014 0.09
May 2014 0.09
June 2014 0.10
July 2014 0.09
August 2014 0.09
September 2014 0.09
October 2014 0.09
November 2014 0.09
December 2014 0.12
January 2015 0.11
February 2015 0.11
March 2015 0.11
April 2015 0.12
May 2015 0.12
June 2015 0.13
July 2015 0.13
August 2015 0.14
September 2015 0.14
October 2015 0.12
November 2015 0.12
December 2015 0.24
January 2016 0.34
February 2016 0.38
March 2016 0.36
April 2016 0.37
May 2016 0.37
June 2016 0.38
July 2016 0.39
August 2016 0.40
September 2016 0.40
October 2016 0.40
November 2016 0.41
December 2016 0.54
January 2017 0.65
February 2017 0.66
March 2017 0.79
April 2017 0.90
May 2017 0.91
June 2017 1.04
July 2017 1.15
August 2017 1.16
September 2017 1.15

Source: For U.S. federal funds rate, Federal Reserve Board, Effective Federal Funds Rate [FEDFUNDS], retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Percent

Period Median FOMC projection*
2018 1.4
2019 2.1
2020 2.7
2021 2.9
Long-run 2.8

* Median value of Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) participants' projections. Return to table

Source: For FOMC projections, Summary of Economic Projections, September 2017, available on the Board's website at https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomcprojtabl20170920.htm.

Figure 11: U.S. 10-Year Government Bond Yield

Monthly

Period Percent
January 1995 7.78
February 1995 7.47
March 1995 7.20
April 1995 7.06
May 1995 6.63
June 1995 6.17
July 1995 6.28
August 1995 6.49
September 1995 6.20
October 1995 6.04
November 1995 5.93
December 1995 5.71
January 1996 5.65
February 1996 5.81
March 1996 6.27
April 1996 6.51
May 1996 6.74
June 1996 6.91
July 1996 6.87
August 1996 6.64
September 1996 6.83
October 1996 6.53
November 1996 6.20
December 1996 6.30
January 1997 6.58
February 1997 6.42
March 1997 6.69
April 1997 6.89
May 1997 6.71
June 1997 6.49
July 1997 6.22
August 1997 6.30
September 1997 6.21
October 1997 6.03
November 1997 5.88
December 1997 5.81
January 1998 5.54
February 1998 5.57
March 1998 5.65
April 1998 5.64
May 1998 5.65
June 1998 5.50
July 1998 5.46
August 1998 5.34
September 1998 4.81
October 1998 4.53
November 1998 4.83
December 1998 4.65
January 1999 4.72
February 1999 5.00
March 1999 5.23
April 1999 5.18
May 1999 5.54
June 1999 5.90
July 1999 5.79
August 1999 5.94
September 1999 5.92
October 1999 6.11
November 1999 6.03
December 1999 6.28
January 2000 6.66
February 2000 6.52
March 2000 6.26
April 2000 5.99
May 2000 6.44
June 2000 6.10
July 2000 6.05
August 2000 5.83
September 2000 5.80
October 2000 5.74
November 2000 5.72
December 2000 5.24
January 2001 5.16
February 2001 5.10
March 2001 4.89
April 2001 5.14
May 2001 5.39
June 2001 5.28
July 2001 5.24
August 2001 4.97
September 2001 4.73
October 2001 4.57
November 2001 4.65
December 2001 5.09
January 2002 5.04
February 2002 4.91
March 2002 5.28
April 2002 5.21
May 2002 5.16
June 2002 4.93
July 2002 4.65
August 2002 4.26
September 2002 3.87
October 2002 3.94
November 2002 4.05
December 2002 4.03
January 2003 4.05
February 2003 3.90
March 2003 3.81
April 2003 3.96
May 2003 3.57
June 2003 3.33
July 2003 3.98
August 2003 4.45
September 2003 4.27
October 2003 4.29
November 2003 4.30
December 2003 4.27
January 2004 4.15
February 2004 4.08
March 2004 3.83
April 2004 4.35
May 2004 4.72
June 2004 4.73
July 2004 4.50
August 2004 4.28
September 2004 4.13
October 2004 4.10
November 2004 4.19
December 2004 4.23
January 2005 4.22
February 2005 4.17
March 2005 4.50
April 2005 4.34
May 2005 4.14
June 2005 4.00
July 2005 4.18
August 2005 4.26
September 2005 4.20
October 2005 4.46
November 2005 4.54
December 2005 4.47
January 2006 4.42
February 2006 4.57
March 2006 4.72
April 2006 4.99
May 2006 5.11
June 2006 5.11
July 2006 5.09
August 2006 4.88
September 2006 4.72
October 2006 4.73
November 2006 4.60
December 2006 4.56
January 2007 4.76
February 2007 4.72
March 2007 4.56
April 2007 4.69
May 2007 4.75
June 2007 5.10
July 2007 5.00
August 2007 4.67
September 2007 4.52
October 2007 4.53
November 2007 4.15
December 2007 4.10
January 2008 3.74
February 2008 3.74
March 2008 3.51
April 2008 3.68
May 2008 3.88
June 2008 4.10
July 2008 4.01
August 2008 3.89
September 2008 3.69
October 2008 3.81
November 2008 3.53
December 2008 2.42
January 2009 2.52
February 2009 2.87
March 2009 2.82
April 2009 2.93
May 2009 3.29
June 2009 3.72
July 2009 3.56
August 2009 3.59
September 2009 3.40
October 2009 3.39
November 2009 3.40
December 2009 3.59
January 2010 3.73
February 2010 3.69
March 2010 3.73
April 2010 3.85
May 2010 3.42
June 2010 3.20
July 2010 3.01
August 2010 2.70
September 2010 2.65
October 2010 2.54
November 2010 2.76
December 2010 3.29
January 2011 3.39
February 2011 3.58
March 2011 3.41
April 2011 3.46
May 2011 3.17
June 2011 3.00
July 2011 3.00
August 2011 2.30
September 2011 1.98
October 2011 2.15
November 2011 2.01
December 2011 1.98
January 2012 1.97
February 2012 1.97
March 2012 2.17
April 2012 2.05
May 2012 1.80
June 2012 1.62
July 2012 1.53
August 2012 1.68
September 2012 1.72
October 2012 1.75
November 2012 1.65
December 2012 1.72
January 2013 1.91
February 2013 1.98
March 2013 1.96
April 2013 1.76
May 2013 1.93
June 2013 2.30
July 2013 2.58
August 2013 2.74
September 2013 2.81
October 2013 2.62
November 2013 2.72
December 2013 2.90
January 2014 2.86
February 2014 2.71
March 2014 2.72
April 2014 2.71
May 2014 2.56
June 2014 2.60
July 2014 2.54
August 2014 2.42
September 2014 2.53
October 2014 2.30
November 2014 2.33
December 2014 2.21
January 2015 1.88
February 2015 1.98
March 2015 2.04
April 2015 1.94
May 2015 2.20
June 2015 2.36
July 2015 2.32
August 2015 2.17
September 2015 2.17
October 2015 2.07
November 2015 2.26
December 2015 2.24
January 2016 2.09
February 2016 1.78
March 2016 1.89
April 2016 1.81
May 2016 1.81
June 2016 1.64
July 2016 1.50
August 2016 1.56
September 2016 1.63
October 2016 1.76
November 2016 2.14
December 2016 2.49
January 2017 2.43
February 2017 2.42
March 2017 2.48
April 2017 2.30
May 2017 2.30
June 2017 2.19
July 2017 2.32
August 2017 2.21
September 2017 2.20

Source: Federal Reserve Board, 10-Year Treasury Constant Maturity Rate, retrieved from FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

Last Update: October 12, 2017