Promoting Minority Depository Institutions - September 2022

Preface

The Federal Reserve Board (Board) submits this report pursuant to section 367 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act). Section 367 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires the Board to submit an annual report to Congress detailing the actions taken to fulfill the requirements outlined in section 308 of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) of 1989, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 (see appendix A). In addition to the annual reporting requirement, FIRREA section 308 requires the Federal Reserve System (System) to devote efforts toward preserving and promoting minority ownership of minority depository institutions (MDIs). This report looks at the System's supervision efforts, the System's Partnership for Progress (PFP) initiatives, the Board's research efforts, and other System efforts and initiatives in 2021.

The Board is responsible for implementing numerous provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, including mandates to preserve and promote MDIs.

The Regulatory Reform page on the Board's website provides information on the Board's efforts implementing the Dodd-Frank Act as well as initiatives the Board expects to address in the future.1

Abbreviations

ANPR
Advance notice of proposed rulemaking
CDFI
Community Development Financial Institution
CRA
Community Reinvestment Act
ECIP
Emergency Capital Investment Program
FIRREA
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989
FRB
Federal Reserve Bank
LICU
Low-income credit union
LMI
Low- and moderate-income
MDI
Minority depository institution
NBA
National Bankers Association
PFP
Partnership for Progress
WDI
Women's depository institution

Executive Summary

Low-wage individuals and minority communities experienced disproportionate harm to both their lives and livelihoods as a result of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: More minorities lost their jobs during the pandemic and were slower to be rehired as the recovery began.2 Minority-owned small businesses closed at a higher rate than White-owned businesses during the early part of the pandemic.3

Given that MDIs serve minority communities, the Federal Reserve took extra steps to support and assist MDIs in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. Among them, the Federal Reserve responded to the crisis by conducting individualized outreach to MDIs and working with the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) to implement the Emergency Capital Investment Program (ECIP).

This report, which covers calendar-year 2021, looks at four areas of the Board's efforts in preserving and promoting MDIs:

  • State Member MDIs looks at the System's supervisory responsibility for the 14 state member MDIs.
  • Partnership for Progress looks at how the System supports MDIs through its PFP program, which is a national outreach effort to help MDIs confront unique business-model challenges, cultivate safe banking practices, and compete more effectively in the marketplace.
  • Research on MDIs and Low- and Moderate-Income Communities looks at research conducted and the articles and surveys published by the Federal Reserve to better understand the challenges MDIs face in their local market areas.
  • Efforts and Initiatives looks at ways the Federal Reserve continued to dedicate resources for proactive outreach and technical assistance activities.

State Member MDIs

Unchanged from 2020, the Board had primary supervisory responsibility for 14 state member MDIs in 2021,4 which are mainly community banks with total assets of $10 billion or less (see table 1).5 Accordingly, the System's community banking organizations program, which is responsible for the risk-focused supervision of state member banks with less than $10 billion in total assets, maintains supervisory responsibility for most of the Board's portfolio of MDIs.

Table 1. Asset distribution of state member MDIs as of December 31, 2021
Asset size Number of banks Percentage of total *
$250 million or less 2 14
$251 million to $500 million 5 36
Over $500 million to $1 billion 3 21
Over $1 billion to $10 billion 1 7
Greater than $10 billion 3 21
Total 14 100

 *. Because of rounding, the sum of values in this column may not equal the total. Return to table

Geographic Dispersion

In 2021, state member MDIs were located in 7 of the 12 Reserve Bank Districts, with assets concentrated in the New York and San Francisco Districts (see table 2).6 State member MDIs in these two Districts accounted for 98 percent of the total state member bank assets in the System's MDI portfolio. Though smaller in asset size, there is also a concentration of state member MDIs in the Kansas City District. All four of these banks are located in Oklahoma and are Native American MDIs.

Table 2. State member MDI distribution by Federal Reserve District as of December 31, 2021
Reserve Bank District Number of MDIs Total assets
(thousands of dollars)
Percentage of total assets *
Atlanta 1 668,803 0.47
Chicago 1 261,044 0.18
Dallas 1 333,572 0.24
Kansas City 4 1,143,887 0.81
New York 2 74,594,650 52.76
Philadelphia 1 335,088 0.24
San Francisco 4 64,060,576 45.31
Total 14 141,397,620 100.00

 *. Because of rounding, the sum of values in this column may not equal the total. Return to table

Minority Ownership Type

The Board's MDI portfolio includes banks representing all minority ownership categories as defined by the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA). As of year-end 2021, five state member MDIs were classified under Asian American minority status, five were classified under Native American minority status, three were classified under Hispanic minority status, and one was classified under Black minority status. (see figure 1).

Figure 1. State member MDIs by minority type as of December 31, 2021
Figure 1. State member MDIs by minority type

Accessible Version | Return to text

Partnership for Progress Programming

The System supports MDIs primarily through its Partnership for Progress program, a national outreach effort to help MDIs confront unique business-model challenges, cultivate safe banking practices, and compete more effectively in the marketplace.

The PFP program is jointly managed by the Community Banking Organizations section of the Federal Reserve's Supervision and Regulation Division and the Community Development section of the Consumer and Community Affairs Division. The Division of Supervision and Regulation strives for a resilient and well-managed financial system that fairly meets the needs of consumers and businesses while working to tailor the Board's supervisory approach based on the size and complexity of firms. The community development function within the System—consisting of individual community development departments at each of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks (FRB) and at the Board—promotes economic growth and financial stability for lower-income communities and individuals through a range of activities, including convening stakeholders, conducting and sharing research, and identifying emerging issues.

The two divisions share in the staffing of the PFP program, and both divisions have appointed senior officers to co-chair the program's Executive Oversight Committee. In addition, each FRB has designated a PFP District coordinator(s) who communicates regularly with the MDIs in their District and assists with accomplishing the mission of the PFP program.

The 2021 PFP programming reflected strong coordination and effort across the Board and FRBs. The System also worked to encourage partnership between examination and community development staff at the FRBs to bring additional resources and creative programming to MDIs throughout the country.

The PFP views the congressional mandate in section 308 of the FIRREA to preserve and promote MDIs as more than simply supervising these institutions. In addition to providing technical assistance and outreach to the System's regulated MDIs, the Board actively works with colleagues at the other regulatory agencies with section 308 responsibilities to ensure a coordinated approach to supporting all MDIs.

In addition, the Board leverages the many resources available to it as the central bank of the United States to support MDIs consistent with the goals of the PFP program. First, the Federal Reserve is a research-driven institution and has engaged with internal and external stakeholders on a range of research projects to better understand the business models of MDIs and how they serve their communities. Second, Federal Reserve leadership, including Board members and Reserve Bank presidents, have used their public platforms to speak about the importance and positive impact of MDIs on underserved communities.7 Third, through the convening power of the Federal Reserve, the System seeks to bring together individuals and institutions to form partnerships that will assist the MDI sector. Though COVID-19 prevented holding any in-person meetings related to the PFP during 2021, the Board continued to convene MDIs via webinars and other virtual forums.

COVID-19 Response and Recovery: Emergency Capital Investment Program

The COVID-19 pandemic brought unprecedented challenges to MDIs and the communities they serve. In the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Congress established the ECIP, which authorizes the Treasury to make up to $9 billion in capital investments in banks and credit unions certified as MDIs or community development financial institutions (CDFIs). ECIP is intended to support the efforts of these institutions to provide loans, grants, and forbearance for small businesses, minority-owned businesses, and consumers in underserved communities that may be disproportionally affected by the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic.8 Per the statute, the Treasury sets aside $2 billion for CDFIs and MDIs with less than $500 million in assets and an additional $2 billion for CDFIs and MDIs with less than $2 billion in assets.

Since the creation of ECIP, Board staff have worked closely with the Treasury on many issues. For example, in March 2021, the federal banking agencies clarified through an interim final rule that preferred stock issued through ECIP qualifies as additional tier 1 capital and that subordinated debt issued through ECIP qualifies as tier 2 capital. In addition, the preamble to the interim final rule indicated that, for purposes of the Small Bank Holding Company and Savings and Loan Holding Company Policy Statement, preferred stock issued under ECIP is equity and subordinated debt issued under ECIP is debt.

During the application review process, PFP staff at the Board and FRBs reviewed the applications for all ECIP applicants that were either bank holding companies or Federal Reserve-regulated state member banks—close to 100 applications. This review entailed confirming the applicant's eligibility, including their status as an MDI.

Supervision and Regulation Letter on the PFP Program for MDIs and Women's Depository Institutions

In March 2021, the Federal Reserve issued SR letter 21-6/CA 21-4: Highlighting the Federal Reserve System's Partnership for Progress Program for Minority Depository Institutions and Women's Depository Institutions. This SR/CA letter outlines for System staff, MDIs, and women's depository institutions (WDIs) the System's PFP program and resources through the PFP that are available to MDIs and WDIs.

The SR/CA letter clarified and highlighted the two definitions used by the System for MDI designation. The System's definition of MDI is consistent with the FIRREA definition of a "minority bank," and states that an MDI is any depository institution (either privately or publicly owned) where 51 percent or more of the voting stock is owned by one or more socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. The definition also states that an MDI, in the case of a mutual institution, is where the majority of the board of directors consists of minority individuals, the majority of the account holders consists of minority individuals, and the community which it services is predominantly minority. In addition to institutions that meet the FIRREA qualifying criteria, the System considers an institution to be an MDI if a majority of its board of directors consists of minority individuals and the community that the institution serves is predominantly minority.

The SR/CA letter also formally defined WDIs and included newly defined WDIs as being eligible for assistance under the PFP program. The System's definition of "women's depository institution" is consistent with the definition of this term in the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) and includes any depository institution where a majority of ownership or a majority of revenue is held by at least one woman, and a significant percentage of senior management positions are held by women.

Conferences and Convenings

Throughout 2021, the Federal Reserve conducted a number of programs specific to MDIs, including the following:

National Interagency MDI and CDFI Bank Conference

Every two years, the federal banking regulatory agencies (the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and Federal Reserve) host an interagency conference for MDI and CDFI banks to help preserve and promote their mission. The 2021 conference was held virtually, September 27–30, 2021.

The theme for the conference was "Navigating the Economy with Resilience and Reinvention," and MDI and CDFI bank executives were invited to participate and dialogue with senior agency officials. The conference began with opening remarks by Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. Principals from each agency—Board Governor Michelle Bowman, FDIC Chairman Jelena McWilliams, and Acting OCC Comptroller Michael Hsu—then engaged in a fireside chat that reflected on the key role MDIs and CDFIs play in serving their communities. Governor Bowman's comments focused on the PFP program and reaffirmed the Federal Reserve's commitment to preserving and promoting MDIs.

More than 300 people attended the conference with participants from over 70 banks. The conference covered a diverse range of topics that included

  • updates from senior officials on trending topics, including resources, programs, and policies that can help minority and CDFI banks achieve their goals;
  • discussions by CEOs from MDI and CDFI banks on top issues faced by bank leadership, trends in banking, and successes they have had competing in today's marketplace;
  • discussions on innovation, collaboration, and the evolving financial services landscape, with examples of successful responses by community and midsize banks; and
  • a discussion on ways in which banks have adapted to new technology and innovative products, as well as the impact of the changing landscape on their business practices.
Banking and the Economy: A Forum for Minorities in Banking, October 18–22, 2021

The System sponsored the sixth annual Banking and the Economy: A Forum for Minorities in Banking in October. The forum gathers minority professionals in middle to senior management in the banking and financial services sectors nationwide. This initiative is designed to support the System's mission through

  • providing minority professionals with advanced tools and knowledge to enhance their careers and networks and increase diverse representation at the senior level in the banking and financial services industry and
  • enhancing awareness of the System by delivering banking and economic updates, quality content and program experience, and education on the organization's mission and work.

The Minorities in Banking Conference was hosted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis and attracted over 800 participants from over 42 states. The week-long virtual forum delivered eight hours of programming focused on leadership, professional development, updates on the banking sector and the economy, and diversity and inclusion content, in addition to two hours of virtual networking opportunities.

Webinars
  • On April 14, 2021,Board and PFP staff attended an interagency webinar session hosted by the FDIC to promote and train MDIs on the Capital Estimator Tool and the Capital Guide for use by MDIs as they contemplate ECIP and other investment options. The tool and guide assisted the entities in determining the impact of additional capital raised either through the Treasury's ECIP or via private equity investments.
  • On May 6, 2021, the Board and FRB Richmond partnered with the FDIC to present a webinar entitled "Investing in Minority Depository Institutions and Opportunities for Partnerships." Over 250 people registered, and PFP staff presented on the Federal Reserve's PFP program.
  • On May 24, 2021, Board and PFP staff hosted an interagency "Ask the Regulators" session in partnership with the Treasury. The purpose of the webinar was to provide an overview of ECIP for eligible MDI and CDFI banks and to answer questions from these institutions.9

Community Reinvestment Act

In September 2020, the Board approved an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPR) for the CRA. The ANPR included a section on MDIs and several proposals to strengthen CRA provisions to support MDIs, WDIs, low-income credit unions (LICUs), as well as CDFIs. The comment period for the ANPR closed in February 2021, and PFP staff led the MDI/CDFI working group that reviewed all comments related to MDIs and CDFIs.

Stakeholders noted that CRA activities through bank partnerships with MDIs, WDIs, LICUs, and CDFIs are key in helping to meet the credit needs of low- and moderate-income (LMI) individuals and communities. Stakeholders supported a stronger emphasis on community development financing and services that support these institutions, including equity investments, long-term debt financing, technical assistance, and contributions to nonprofit affiliates. Some stakeholders suggested the need to increase certainty surrounding the treatment of activities in partnership with MDIs, WDIs, LICUs, and CDFIs.

Informed by stakeholder feedback, the MDI/CDFI working group recommended criteria and standards that could be used to determine qualifying activities with MDIs, women-owned financial institutions, and LICUs, as well as criteria to determine what activities with these institutions could be considered especially impactful. These recommendations were sent to the CRA team.

Collaboration with Trade Groups and Other Partners

Throughout 2021, PFP consulted closely with the National Bankers Association (NBA), the trade group for minority banks.

  • In February, PFP organized a call between Board staff and the NBA's Keepers Fund to discusss Change in Control and Bank Holding Company Act rules for investing in banks. PFP continued to consult with the NBA throughout 2021 on their Keepers Fund.
  • Also in February, PFP staff and Board staff held a call with the NBA and Community Development Bankers Association regarding the Treasury's ECIP.
Speeches

Another way the Federal Reserve promotes MDIs is through public speeches from its leadership. For example, in October, Governor Brainard delivered a speech entitled "Financial Inclusion and Economic Challenges in the Shadow of the Pandemic: A Conversation with Tribal Leaders" at Fed Listens: Roundtable with Oklahoma Tribal Leaders. The remarks centered on barriers to financial inclusion in Indian Country.10

Research on MDIs and Low- and Moderate-Income Communities

Research on MDIs

Continuing with the Federal Reserve's commitment to understanding the challenges minority banking institutions face and their local market areas, the Board has commissioned research on MDIs. All past research is available on the PFP website.11

Articles and Surveys

Throughout 2021, Board staff published articles and surveys that both evaluated conditions in LMI communities and described efforts to support them, including efforts by MDIs and community banks. Much of the research was focused on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on low-income and minority communities, the same communities served by MDIs. The community development function at the Board and FRBs spearheaded most of this work. Because the success of MDIs is often dependent on the health of the communities they serve, these articles and surveys are particularly relevant to the MDI business model. In addition, several articles noted the difficulty minority and LMI populations have in accessing credit from mainstream financial institutions, including small business credit. The articles intend to provide service providers, policymakers, and others with a way to assess the needs of these communities and to evaluate changes in the economic conditions of these populations.

The following list highlights some of the articles and surveys published during 2021:

  • Minority Banks during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected the health and financial well-being of minority communities. Over the past year, minority banks that specialize in providing financial services to underserved communities and minority borrowers have also performed significantly worse than other banks of similar size. Minority banks projected higher loan losses and had lower profits than non-minority banks. See https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/el2021-20.pdf.
  • Black-Owned Banks and the Communities They Serve: Black-owned banks are uniquely positioned to assist the economic recovery in majority-Black communities where they operate. The COVID-19 pandemic had a disproportionate impact on Black-owned businesses and areas, while Paycheck Protection Program loans were slow to arrive. The number of Black-owned banks has been declining, but recently they have attracted greater support, and some Black-owned banks have reported an uptick in deposits. See https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional-economist/first-quarter-2021/black-owned-banks-communities-they-serve.
  • Understanding Community Development Financial Institutions and their Impact in Low- and Moderate-Income Neighborhoods - Volume 15, Issue 1: CDFIs are mission-driven lenders that create economic opportunity for low-income communities and individuals throughout the United States. The history of CDFIs dates back to the 1970s. There are currently over 1,100 operating as banks, credit unions, nonprofit loan funds, and venture capital funds. CDFI financing leads to the creation of jobs, affordable housing, community facilities and more. This issue of the Community Development Innovation Review is a collection of research papers designed to expand our understanding of CDFIs and their impact in vulnerable communities across the country. See https://www.frbsf.org/community-development/publications/community-development-investment-review/2021/may/community-development-financial-institutions-impact-low-moderate-income-neighborhoods/.
  • Which Lenders Are More Likely to Reach Out to Underserved Consumers: Banks versus Fintechs versus Other Nonbanks?: There has been a great deal of interest recently in understanding the potential role of fintech firms in expanding credit access to the underbanked and credit-constrained consumers. This paper explores the supply side of fintech credit, focusing on unsecured personal loans and mortgage loans. In addition, this paper investigates whether fintech firms are more likely than other lenders to reach out to "underserved consumers," such as minorities; those with low income, low credit scores, or thin credit histories; or those who have a history of being denied for credit. Using a rich data set of credit offers from Mintel, in conjunction with credit information from TransUnion and other consumer credit data from the FRB New York/Equifax Consumer Credit Panel, this paper compares similar credit offers that were made by banks, fintech firms, and other nonbank lenders. Fintech firms are more likely than banks to offer mortgage credit to consumers with lower income, lower-credit scores, and those who have been denied credit in the recent past. Fintechs are also more likely than banks to offer personal loans to consumers who had filed for bankruptcy (thus also more likely to receive credit card offers overall) and those who had recently been denied credit. For both personal loans and mortgage loans, fintech firms are more likely than other lenders to reach out and offer credit to nonprime consumers. See https://www.philadelphiafed.org/-/media/frbp/assets/working-papers/2021/wp21-17.pdf.

Efforts and Initiatives

Preserving the Character and Number of MDIs

To preserve the character and number of state member MDIs, staff from the Board's mergers and acquisitions function coordinate with the FDIC to help identify healthy minority banking organizations capable of acquiring or merging with state member MDIs that are in troubled condition. To this end, PFP staff provide the FDIC quarterly with a list of all MDIs under Board supervision. The Federal Reserve's mergers and acquisitions function continues to offer a pre-filing option for banking proposals, which provides critical feedback on potential issues and potentially shortens the review period for many formal proposals. Finally, whenever Federal Reserve staff receive a proposal involving an MDI, every effort is made to ensure that the institution's MDI status is preserved and that its future prospects are enhanced.

Promoting the Creation of MDIs

The Federal Reserve strives to promote the creation of new MDIs by providing guidance via public websites about regulatory procedures for minority bank ownership, informing MDIs of advantageous federally sponsored programs, and promoting community development. These web posts also provide guidance about financial institution development, including information about the process of starting a bank, managing a bank through the de novo period, and growing shareholder value while ensuring safe and sound operations. Further, coordinators from each FRB periodically discuss emerging issues, attend conferences, serve on local exam teams during examinations, and collect feedback from MDIs on what they are seeing and how the PFP can provide additional assistance.

During 2021, PFP staff engaged with three groups seeking guidance from the regulatory agencies on navigating the de novo process for establishing new MDIs. Staff of the PFP and relevant FRB answered questions, provided resources, and offered assistance on navigating the de novo applications process.

Training, Technical Assistance, and Educational Programs

Coordinators from each FRB meet as needed with MDI management to discuss emerging issues and provide technical assistance, especially to those in troubled condition, to explain supervisory guidance, discuss challenges, and respond to management concerns. Trending topics discussed throughout 2021 included the ECIP program, multifamily lending, capital rules, CRA, and the Bank Secrecy Act. The goals of these conversations are to help MDIs through technical complexities; provide the PFP with valuable insight and feedback on challenges facing MDIs; and gather MDI feedback on regulatory reform proposals, such as the CRA ANPR.

Partnership for Progress Website

Consistent with past years, one of the primary vehicles for distributing educational materials relevant to MDIs continues to be the System's PFP website.12

The website provides information about new regulations and their impact on community banking organizations, advertises regulatory and agency events relevant to MDIs, and shares information focused on market conditions and economic data related to areas typically served by MDIs.

Starting in 2021, the PFP team engaged an external consultant to begin the process of substantially updating the PFP website for the first time since its inception. The goals of the website revision are to modernize the website, increase stakeholder engagement, and improve the accessibility of information. Work will continue through 2022, with an anticipated launch date of 2023.

Publications and Webinars

The Federal Reserve continues to support enhanced communications with community banks, including MDIs. To this end, the staff disseminates important information about regulatory matters through the publications and programs listed below, most of which are accessible through links on the PFP website.

The System's Community Banking Connections publication serves to13

  • clarify key supervisory guidance,
  • highlight new regulations,
  • provide perspectives from bank examiners and System staff, and
  • address challenges and concerns facing community banks and provide resources to assist them.

The System's Consumer Compliance Outlook publication focuses on compliance with federal consumer protection laws and regulations for financial services and serves to14

  • clarify key supervisory guidance,
  • explain new and existing regulatory compliance requirements,
  • provide perspectives from bank examiners and System staff,
  • address challenges and concerns facing community banks and provide resources to assist them, and
  • discuss emerging compliance issues such as lenders' use of alternative data in credit decisions.

"Outlook Live" is a webinar series dedicated to consumer compliance.15 The "Outlook Live" webinars involve a variety of presenters from both the System and the other federal financial regulatory agencies, focusing on key emerging issues in the industry.

"Ask the Fed" is a Federal Reserve program for officials of state member banks and other insured depository institutions, bank and thrift holding companies, state bank commissioners, and state banking associations.16 "Ask the Fed" consists of periodic conference calls/webinars that feature Federal Reserve experts and guest speakers on top banking questions of the day with time at the end for questions and comments.

Appendix A: Section 308 of FIRREA

Section 308 of FIRREA, as amended by the Dodd-Frank Act, requires

  1. CONSULTATION ON METHODS.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall consult with the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Chairman of the National Credit Union Administration, and the Chairperson of the Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on methods for best achieving the following:

    1. Preserving the present number of minority depository institutions.
    2. Preserving their minority character in cases involving mergers or acquisition of a minority depository institution by using general preference guidelines in the following order:

      1. Same type of minority depository institution in the same city.
      2. Same type of minority depository institution in the same State.
      3. Same type of minority depository institution nationwide.
      4. Any type of minority depository institution in the same city.
      5. Any type of minority depository institution in the same State.
      6. Any type of minority depository institution nationwide.
      7. Any other bidders.
    3. Providing technical assistance to prevent insolvency of institutions not now insolvent.
    4. Promoting and encouraging creation of new minority depository institutions.
    5. Providing for training, technical assistance, and educational programs.
  2. DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section—
    1. MINORITY FINANCIAL INSTITUTION.—The term "minority depository institution" means any depository institution that—

      1. if a privately owned institution, 51 percent is owned by one or more socially- and economically-disadvantaged individuals;
      2. if publicly owned, 51 percent of the stock is owned by one or more socially- and economically-disadvantaged individuals; and
      3. in the case of a mutual institution, the majority of the board of directors, account holders, and the community which it services is predominantly minority.
    2. MINORITY.—The term "minority" means any Black American, Native American, Hispanic American, or Asian American.17

In addition, section 367 of the Dodd-Frank Act amended FIRREA to require the supervisory agencies to submit an annual report to the Congress containing a description of actions taken to carry out FIRREA section 308.

Appendix B: MDI Tables and Figures

Figure B.1. Proportion of MDIs that are state member banks, 2017–21
Figure B.1. Proportion of MDIs that are state member banks, 2017–21

Accessible Version | Return to text

SM is state member.

Key identifies bars in order from left to right.

Figure B.2. Assets by type of MDI, 2017–21
Figure B.2. Assets by type of MDI, 2017–21

Accessible Version | Return to text

SM is state member.

Key identifies bars in order from left to right.

Figure B.3. Number of state member MDIs by type of minority, 2017–21
Figure B.3. Number of state member MDIs by type of minority, 2017–21

Accessible Version | Return to text

The minority status of an institution is determined according to either (1) a concentration of ownership among members of a certain minority group, or (2) a concentration of Board membership among that minority group by an institution that primarily serves that minority group. To simplify the use of the historical data, these two criteria were combined in 2017 to arrive at a single data field that indicates one of five values for minority status. As a result, as of year-end 2017, no state member banks qualify as multiracial.

SMB is state member bank.

Key identifies bars in order from left to right.

Table B.1. State member MDIs as of December 31, 2021
ID RSSD Institution name State Reserve Bank District Minority status * Assets
(thousands of dollars)
146056 AllNations Bank OK Kansas City N 49,528
2785477 Asian Bank PA Philadelphia A 335,088
940311 Banco Popular de Puerto Rico PR New York H 64,205,000
815754 Bank of Cherokee County OK Kansas City N 169,405
777366 Bank of the Orient CA San Francisco A 946,569
64552 Chicasaw Community Bank OK Kansas City N 349,214
680130 Citizens Trust Bank GA Atlanta B 668,803
3337097 CommonWealth Business Bank CA San Francisco A 1,808,717
197478 East West Bank CA San Francisco A 60,849,631
296456 FirstBank OK Kansas City N 575,740
365745 Pinnacle Bank IA Chicago N 261,044
2736291 Popular Bank NY New York H 10,389,650
3487947 Unibank CA San Francisco A 455,659
2942823 United Bank of El Paso del Norte TX Dallas H 333,572
Number of Institutions: 14   Total Assets   141,397,620

 *. B is Black or African American; H is Hispanic American; A is Asian or Pacific Islander American; N is Native American or Alaskan Native American; M is multiracial American. Return to table

Table B.2. List of MDIs as of December 31, 2021
Name City of Industry State Est. date Class1 Regulator Minority status alpha 2 Total assets
(thousands of dollars)
Alamerica Bank Birmingham AL 20000128 NM FDIC B 16,036
Commonwealth National Bank Mobile AL 19760219 N OCC B 56,890
Banesco USA Coral Gables FL 20060110 NM FDIC H 2,133,551
U.S. Century Bank Doral FL 20021028 NM FDIC H 1,853,939
Interamerican Bank A FSB Miami FL 19760823 SB OCC H 270,351
International Finance Bank Miami FL 19831130 NM FDIC H 945,707
Ocean Bank Miami FL 19821209 NM FDIC H 5,325,419
Plus International Bank Miami FL 20010914 NM FDIC H 79,521
Sunstate Bank Miami FL 19990315 NM FDIC H 494,078
Apollo Bank Miami FL 20210922 NM FDIC H 1,044,185
Central Bank Tampa FL 20070226 NM FDIC A 265,134
Touchmark National Bank Alpharetta GA 20080128 N OCC A 421,736
Citizens Trust Bank Atlanta GA 19210618 SM FED B 668,803
First IC Bank Doraville GA 20000131 NM FDIC A 942,129
Metro City Bank Doraville GA 20060404 NM FDIC A 3,111,820
PromiseOne Bank Duluth GA 20081106 NM FDIC A 593,492
Loyal Trust Bank Johns Creek GA 20191118 NM FDIC A 113,584
Embassy National Bank Lawrenceville GA 20070305 N OCC A 117,791
Carver State Bank Savannah GA 19270101 NM FDIC B 61,954
Quantum National Bank Suwanee GA 19951227 N OCC A 642,022
Mechanics & Farmers Bank Durham NC 19080301 NM FDIC B 365,178
Lumbee Guaranty Bank Pembroke NC 19711222 NM FDIC N 473,266
Optus Bank Columbia SC 19990326 NM FDIC B 315,458
Citizens Bank Of Chatsworth Chatsworth IL 19031207 NM FDIC A 42,466
American Metro Bank Chicago IL 19970129 NM FDIC A 87,804
GN Bank Chicago IL 19340101 SB OCC B 84,657
International Bank of Chicago Chicago IL 19921026 NM FDIC A 890,158
Millennium Bank Des Plaines IL 20070702 NM FDIC A 283,227
First Independence Bank Detroit MI 19700514 NM FDIC B 412,314
Bay Bank Green Bay WI 19950821 NM FDIC N 216,826
Columbia Savings & Loan Assn Milwaukee WI 19240101 SL FDIC B 26,945
Native American Bank NA Denver CO 19870727 N OCC N 192,848
Liberty Bank & Trust Co New Orleans LA 19721116 NM FDIC B 971,090
Community 1st Bank Las Vegas Las Vegas NM 19491123 NM FDIC H 169,376
Centinel Bank of Taos Taos NM 19690301 NM FDIC H 380,203
FirstBank Antlers OK 19010101 SM FED N 575,740
AllNations Bank Calumet OK 19010101 SM FED N 49,528
F&M Bank Edmond OK 19020101 NM FDIC N 639,930
Bank of Grand Lake Grove OK 20050609 NM FDIC H 239,140
Bank of Cherokee County Hulbert OK 19081201 SM FED N 169,405
Gateway First Bank Jenks OK 19350302 NM FDIC N 1,879,005
Chickasaw Community Bank Oklahoma City OK 19030101 SM FED N 349,214
First Security Bank & Trust Co Oklahoma City OK 19510406 NM FDIC B 61,252
The Pauls Valley National Bank Pauls Valley OK 20210701 N OCC N 317,781
First National Bank & Trust Co Shawnee OK 19841029 N OCC N 718,073
Carson Community Bank Stilwell OK 19030203 NM FDIC N 169,174
Citizens Savings B&T Co Nashville TN 19040104 NM FDIC B 134,538
The First State Bank Abernathy TX 19310101 NM FDIC N 55,969
International Bank of Commerce Brownsville TX 19841009 NM FDIC H 3,780,081
American Bank National Assn Dallas TX 19740502 N OCC A 204,203
One World Bank Dallas TX 20050404 NM FDIC A 138,791
State Bank of Texas Dallas TX 19871019 NM FDIC A 1,322,130
United Bank El Paso Del Norte El Paso TX 20010501 SM FED H 333,572
Spectra Bank Fort Worth TX 19860630 NM FDIC A 91,460
Freedom Bank Freer TX 19580712 NM FDIC H 94,849
American First National Bank Houston TX 19980518 N OCC A 2,287,371
Golden Bank National Assn Houston TX 19850503 N OCC A 1,293,564
Southwestern National Bank Houston TX 19971103 N OCC A 856,490
Unity National Bank of Houston Houston TX 19850801 N OCC B 253,823
Commerce Bank Laredo TX 19820331 NM FDIC H 667,502
Falcon International Bank Laredo TX 19861210 NM FDIC H 1,844,758
International Bank of Commerce Laredo TX 19660902 NM FDIC H 9,291,812
Bank of South Texas Mcallen TX 19860708 NM FDIC H 139,198
Rio Bank Mcallen TX 19850211 NM FDIC H 745,346
Texas National Bank Mercedes TX 19201126 N OCC H 593,232
Lone Star National Bank Pharr TX 19830124 N OCC H 3,063,266
Citizens State Bank Roma TX 19780515 NM FDIC H 87,983
First State Bank Shallowater TX 19601008 NM FDIC A 125,186
Wallis Bank Wallis TX 19721028 NM FDIC A 1,111,138
International Bank of Commerce Zapata TX 19840206 NM FDIC H 474,338
Zapata National Bank Zapata TX 19611116 N OCC H 97,932
Pinnacle Bank Marshalltown IA 19270505 SM FED N 261,044
CBW Bank Weir KS 19340228 NM FDIC A 65,314
Woodlands National Bank Hinckley MN 19081001 N OCC N 350,967
Peoples Bank of Seneca Seneca MO 19960315 NM FDIC N 340,718
Turtle Mountain State Bank Belcourt ND 20071203 NM FDIC N 225,640
City First Bank, NA Washington DC 19981124 N OCC B 1,092,804
Industrial Bank Washington DC 19340818 NM FDIC B 625,437
Leader Bank National Assn Arlington MA 20020508 N OCC A 3,077,235
Harbor Bank of Maryland Baltimore MD 19820913 NM FDIC B 329,750
Keb Hana Bank USA NA Fort Lee NJ 19860916 N OCC A 293,014
New Millennium Bank Fort Lee NJ 19990719 NM FDIC A 540,808
Ponce Bank Bronx NY 19600331 SB OCC H 1,642,212
Amerasia Bank Flushing NY 19880620 NM FDIC A 886,830
NewBank Flushing NY 20060929 NM FDIC A 554,530
Abacus Federal Savings Bank New York NY 19841129 SB OCC A 336,780
Carver Federal Savings Bank New York NY 19480101 SB OCC B 723,256
Eastbank National Assn New York NY 19841126 N OCC A 160,262
Global Bank New York NY 20070312 NM FDIC A 231,976
Piermont Bank New York NY 20190701 NM FDIC M 364,162
Popular Bank New York NY 19990102 SM FED H 10,389,650
Shinhan Bank America New York NY 19901018 NM FDIC A 1,919,589
United Orient Bank New York NY 19810409 NM FDIC A 94,906
Woori America Bank New York NY 19840127 NM FDIC A 2,969,506
Noah Bank Elkins Park PA 20060717 NM FDIC A 316,881
Asian Bank Philadelphia PA 19990609 SM FED A 335,088
United Bank of Philadelphia Philadelphia PA 19920323 NM FDIC B 64,379
Banco Popular De Puerto Rico San Juan PR 19990102 SM FED H 64,205,000
Oriental Bank San Juan PR 19650325 NM FDIC H 9,805,742
Firstbank Puerto Rico Santurce PR 19490117 NM FDIC H 20,778,081
Canyon Community Bank, NA Tucson AZ 20001010 N OCC A 160,310
First Commercial Bank USA Alhambra CA 19970520 NM FDIC A 814,543
New Omni Bank National Assn Alhambra CA 19800212 N OCC A 559,016
American Plus Bank NA Arcadia CA 20070808 N OCC A 591,059
American Continental Bank City Of Industry CA 20031006 NM FDIC A 336,086
United Pacific Bank City Of Industry CA 19820511 NM FDIC A 174,584
Community Commerce Bank Claremont CA 19761001 NM FDIC H 315,202
US Metro Bank Garden Grove CA 20060915 NM FDIC A 967,099
California Business Bank Irvine CA 20051101 NM FDIC A 121,611
Commercial Bank of Ca Irvine CA 20030515 NM FDIC H 2,027,942
Bank of Hope Los Angeles CA 19860318 NM FDIC A 17,883,792
Cathay Bank Los Angeles CA 19620419 NM FDIC A 20,872,611
Commonwealth Business Bank Los Angeles CA 20050303 SM FED A 1,808,717
CTBC Bank Corp USA Los Angeles CA 19650427 NM FDIC A 4,329,500
Eastern International Bank Los Angeles CA 19850226 NM FDIC A 138,688
Hanmi Bank Los Angeles CA 19821215 NM FDIC A 6,855,957
Open Bank Los Angeles CA 20050610 NM FDIC A 1,726,548
Pacific City Bank Los Angeles CA 20030918 NM FDIC A 2,149,703
Preferred Bank Los Angeles CA 19911223 NM FDIC A 6,045,825
Royal Business Bank Los Angeles CA 20081118 NM FDIC A 4,222,275
Genesis Bank Newport Beach CA 20210908 NM FDIC M 85,797
Gateway Bank FSB Oakland CA 19900608 SB OCC A 175,343
Metropolitan Bank Oakland CA 19830901 NM FDIC A 211,376
East West Bank Pasadena CA 19720101 SM FED A 60,849,631
Evertrust Bank Pasadena CA 19950503 NM FDIC A 995,389
Pacific Alliance Bank Rosemead CA 20061227 NM FDIC A 372,293
First General Bank Rowland Heights CA 20051013 NM FDIC A 1,246,519
Bank of the Orient San Francisco CA 19710317 SM FED A 946,569
California Pacific Bank San Francisco CA 19801016 NM FDIC A 83,414
Mission National Bank San Francisco CA 19820216 N OCC A 220,687
Asian Pacific National Bank San Gabriel CA 19900725 N OCC A 59,523
Mega Bank San Gabriel CA 20080205 NM FDIC A 456,116
Universal Bank West Covina CA 19541117 SB OCC A 377,350
California Intl Bank NA Westminster CA 20051130 N OCC A 89,932
Bank of Whittier NA Whittier CA 19821220 N OCC A 164,678
Anz Guam Inc Hagatna GU 19910111 NM FDIC A 437,930
Bank of Guam Hagatna GU 19721211 NM FDIC A 2,763,606
Bankpacific Ltd Hagatna GU 19530101 SL FDIC A 192,265
Finance Factors Ltd Honolulu HI 19520514 NM FDIC A 578,059
Hawaii National Bank Honolulu HI 19600916 N OCC A 891,460
OneUnited Bank Boston MA 19820802 NM FDIC B 643,447
Eagle Bank Polson MT 20060725 NM FDIC N 97,517
Unibank Lynnwood WA 20061101 SM FED A 455,659
               
Total: 143             $325,803,921

 1. NM is state bank, not a member of the Federal Reserve (FED); SM is state bank, member of the FED; N is national bank; SL is state or federal savings and loan association; SB is state or federal savings bank. Return to table

 2. B is Black or African American; H is Hispanic American; A is Asian or Pacific Islander American; N is Native American or Alaskan Native American; M is multiracial American. Return to table

Footnotes

 1. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, "About Regulatory Reform," https://www.federalreserve.gov/regreform/about.htm; "Implementing the Dodd-Frank Act: The Federal Reserve Board's Role," https://www.federalreserve.gov/regreform/milestones.htmReturn to text

 2. As shown in the Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking, 2021, during the survey period, 23 percent of Black adults were laid off, compared with 21 percent of Hispanic adults and 14 percent of White adults, https://www.federalreserve.gov/consumerscommunities/shed.htmReturn to text

 3. Robert W. Fairlie, "The Impact of Covid-19 on Small Business Owners: Evidence of Early-Stage Losses from the April 2020 Current Population Survey," Working Paper 27309 (Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2020), https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27309/w27309.pdfReturn to text

 4. The term "state member" refers to state-chartered banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System. Return to text

 5. For more details on the 14 state member MDIs discussed in this report as well as a comparison of the number, assets, and demographics of state member MDIs from 2017–21, see table B.1. in appendix BReturn to text

 6. Reserve Banks for the 12 Districts are headquartered in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Cleveland, Richmond, Atlanta, Chicago, St. Louis, Minneapolis, Kansas City, Dallas, and San Francisco. Return to text

 7. For example, Federal Reserve Board Governor Lael Brainard spoke about the importance of supporting Native community development financial institutions and MDIs. See "Financial Inclusion and Economic Challenges in the Shadow of the Pandemic: A Conversation with Tribal Leaders" (speech at Fed Listens: Roundtable with Oklahoma Tribal Leaders, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, October 13, 2021), https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/brainard20211013a.htmReturn to text

 8. "Emergency Capital Investment Program," U.S. Department of the Treasury, https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-small-businesses/emergency-capital-investment-programReturn to text

 9. See FRB St. Louis, "Ask the Fed," https://bsr.stlouisfed.org/askthefed/Return to text

 10. The speech is available at https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/brainard20211013a.htmReturn to text

 11. Full research papers can be found at https://www.fedpartnership.gov/federal-reserve-resourcesReturn to text

 12. Partnership for Progress, https://www.fedpartnership.govReturn to text

 13. Community Banking Connections is a registered trademark of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, https://www.communitybankingconnections.orgReturn to text

 14. Consumer Compliance Outlook is a registered trademark of the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, https://consumercomplianceoutlook.orgReturn to text

 15. The outlook live webinars can be seen at https://consumercomplianceoutlook.org/outlook-live/Return to text

 16. To register for "Ask the Fed," visit the site at https://bsr.stlouisfed.org/askthefed/Auth/LogonReturn to text

 17. Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, Pub. L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183 (1989). Return to text

Back to Top
Last Update: September 16, 2022