New Accounting Framework Faces Its First Test: CECL During the Pandemic, Accessible Data

Figure 1: Banking System Quarterly Net Charge-off Rate with Economic Indicators
Date Real GDP growth (left axis) Unemployment rate (left axis) Net charge-off rate (right axis)
2004Q1 0.6% 6% 0.2%
2004Q2 0.8% 6% 0.2%
2004Q3 0.9% 5% 0.1%
2004Q4 1.0% 5% 0.2%
2005Q1 1.1% 5% 0.1%
2005Q2 0.5% 5% 0.1%
2005Q3 0.8% 5% 0.2%
2005Q4 0.6% 5% 0.2%
2006Q1 1.3% 5% 0.1%
2006Q2 0.2% 5% 0.1%
2006Q3 0.2% 5% 0.1%
2006Q4 0.8% 4% 0.2%
2007Q1 0.3% 5% 0.1%
2007Q2 0.6% 5% 0.1%
2007Q3 0.6% 5% 0.2%
2007Q4 0.6% 5% 0.2%
2008Q1 -0.4% 5% 0.3%
2008Q2 0.6% 5% 0.3%
2008Q3 -0.5% 6% 0.4%
2008Q4 -2.2% 7% 0.5%
2009Q1 -1.2% 8% 0.5%
2009Q2 -0.2% 9% 0.7%
2009Q3 0.4% 10% 0.7%
2009Q4 1.1% 10% 0.9%
2010Q1 0.5% 10% 0.8%
2010Q2 1.0% 10% 0.7%
2010Q3 0.8% 9% 0.6%
2010Q4 0.5% 10% 0.6%
2011Q1 -0.2% 9% 0.5%
2011Q2 0.7% 9% 0.4%
2011Q3 0.0% 9% 0.4%
2011Q4 1.1% 9% 0.4%
2012Q1 0.8% 8% 0.3%
2012Q2 0.5% 8% 0.3%
2012Q3 0.2% 8% 0.3%
2012Q4 0.1% 8% 0.3%
2013Q1 0.9% 8% 0.2%
2013Q2 0.1% 8% 0.2%
2013Q3 0.8% 7% 0.2%
2013Q4 0.7% 7% 0.2%
2014Q1 -0.4% 7% 0.1%
2014Q2 1.3% 6% 0.1%
2014Q3 1.2% 6% 0.1%
2014Q4 0.4% 6% 0.1%
2015Q1 0.8% 6% 0.2%
2015Q2 0.6% 5% 0.1%
2015Q3 0.3% 5% 0.1%
2015Q4 0.1% 5% 0.2%
2016Q1 0.6% 5% 0.1%
2016Q2 0.3% 5% 0.1%
2016Q3 0.6% 5% 0.1%
2016Q4 0.5% 5% 0.1%
2017Q1 0.5% 5% 0.1%
2017Q2 0.6% 4% 0.1%
2017Q3 0.7% 4% 0.1%
2017Q4 0.9% 4% 0.1%
2018Q1 0.8% 4% 0.1%
2018Q2 0.8% 4% 0.1%
2018Q3 0.5% 4% 0.1%
2018Q4 0.2% 4% 0.1%
2019Q1 0.6% 4% 0.1%
2019Q2 0.8% 4% 0.1%
2019Q3 0.7% 4% 0.1%
2019Q4 0.5% 4% 0.1%
2020Q1 -1.3% 4% 0.1%
2020Q2 -8.9% 13% 0.1%
2020Q3 7.5% 9% 0.1%
2020Q4 1.1% 7% 0.1%
2021Q1 1.5% 6% 0.1%
2021Q2 1.6% 6% 0.1%

Note: Recessions are shaded in grey. The net charge-off rate is measured relative to total loans.

Sources: FRED, FR Y-9C, FFIEC Call Reports, and NBER.

Return to text

Figure 2: Provision and Net Charge-off Rates around the 2007-09 Financial Crisis

As a fraction of total loans

Date Provision rate (left scale) Net charge-off rate (left scale) Allowances (right scale)
2004Q1 0.0016 -0.0018 0.0166
2004Q2 0.0014 -0.0016 0.0159
2004Q3 0.0015 -0.0015 0.0153
2004Q4 0.0017 -0.0019 0.0147
2005Q1 0.0013 -0.0014 0.0142
2005Q2 0.0013 -0.0013 0.0137
2005Q3 0.0018 -0.0016 0.0135
2005Q4 0.0017 -0.0018 0.0129
2006Q1 0.0011 -0.0010 0.0125
2006Q2 0.0012 -0.0011 0.0122
2006Q3 0.0014 -0.0013 0.0121
2006Q4 0.0019 -0.0015 0.0120
2007Q1 0.0016 -0.0014 0.0121
2007Q2 0.0019 -0.0015 0.0121
2007Q3 0.0025 -0.0017 0.0126
2007Q4 0.0046 -0.0024 0.0145
2008Q1 0.0048 -0.0027 0.0166
2008Q2 0.0060 -0.0035 0.0189
2008Q3 0.0065 -0.0039 0.0211
2008Q4 0.0093 -0.0051 0.0245
2009Q1 0.0085 -0.0053 0.0278
2009Q2 0.0095 -0.0071 0.0306
2009Q3 0.0089 -0.0075 0.0326
2009Q4 0.0093 -0.0087 0.0336
2010Q1 0.0071 -0.0076 0.0371
2010Q2 0.0057 -0.0069 0.0361
2010Q3 0.0048 -0.0063 0.0347
2010Q4 0.0045 -0.0061 0.0330
2011Q1 0.0029 -0.0049 0.0314
2011Q2 0.0027 -0.0042 0.0295
2011Q3 0.0028 -0.0040 0.0280
2011Q4 0.0027 -0.0036 0.0265
2012Q1 0.0020 -0.0030 0.0249
2012Q2 0.0019 -0.0029 0.0236
2012Q3 0.0022 -0.0032 0.0220
2012Q4 0.0020 -0.0026 0.0212
2013Q1 0.0015 -0.0022 0.0205
2013Q2 0.0012 -0.0020 0.0195
2013Q3 0.0008 -0.0016 0.0186
2013Q4 0.0011 -0.0017 0.0175

Note: The increase in allowance in 2010:Q1 reflects the introduction of FAS 166 and FAS 167 that tightened the accounting for securitizations and consolidation of securitization entities, respectively, causing banks to recognize securitized assets on the balance sheet.

Sources: FR Y-9C filing firms and Call Report firms with filings not consolidated within included filings.

Return to text

Figure 3: Allowances of CECL Adopters and Non-Adopters

Allowances (indexed to 2019:Q4=100)

Date Non-adopters CECL adopters
2019Q1 96 103
2019Q2 97 102
2019Q3 99 102
2019Q4 100 100
1/1/2020   136
2020Q1 111 170
2020Q2 125 214
2020Q3 132 214
2020Q4 135 205
2021Q1 133 183
2021Q2 129 165

Note: The adoption of CECL results in a jump in allowances (of CECL adopters) on January 1, 2020.

Sources: FR Y-9C filing firms and Call Report firms with filings not consolidated within included filings.

Return to text

Figure 4: Capital (CET1) Ratios of Jan. 1 CECL Adopters, Actual versus Estimates under ILM

CET1 Capital Ratio

Date Actual No Transition Rule Est. Range Under ILM (low) Est. Range Under ILM (high)
2019Q4 0.119      
2020Q1 0.118 0.118 0.118 0.118
2020Q2 0.113 0.110 0.113 0.114
2020Q3 0.118 0.114 0.119 0.121
2020Q4 0.122 0.118 0.122 0.125
2021Q1 0.124 0.120 0.123 0.126
2021Q2 0.126 0.122 0.124 0.127
2021Q3 0.125 0.122 0.123 0.126

Note: CET1 capital ratio = Common equity tier 1 capital divided by risk-weighted assets.

Sources: FR Y-9C, FFIEC Call Reports, and authors’ analysis.

Return to text

Figure 5: Estimated Average CECL Impact ($$\beta_p$$) on Allowances and Loan Growth, by Loan Type
Loan type Impact on Quarterly Loan Growth (pp) Impact on Allowance/Loans (pp)
estimate confidence interval - lower bound confidence interval - upper bound estimate confidence interval - lower bound confidence interval - upper bound
commercial -0.49 -1.21 0.24 0.23 0.02 0.43
construction 0.40 -1.12 1.93 0.53 0.27 0.79
commercial real estate (cre) -0.11 -0.74 0.52 0.35 0.20 0.51
other consumer* -2.53 -4.60 -0.45 0.82 0.41 1.23
residential real estate (rre) -0.31 -1.18 0.56 0.32 0.21 0.43

Note: *Other consumer includes all consumer loans other than mortgage and credit cards, and primarily consists of student, auto, and installment loans. Our test rejects the hypothesis of parallel growth trends for other consumer loans prior to CECL adoption (2016-2019). See endnote 16 for further discussion.

Sources: FR Y-9C, FFIEC Call Reports, and authors’ analysis.

Return to text

Last Update: December 03, 2021