SR 13-20 / CA 13-23:
Interagency Statement on Supervisory Approach for Qualified and Non-Qualified Mortgage Loans
OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20551
DIVISION OF BANKING
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
DIVISION OF CONSUMER
AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
December 13, 2013
TO THE OFFICERS IN CHARGE OF SUPERVISION AND APPROPRIATE SUPERVISORY AND EXAMINATION STAFF AT THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS AND TO FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE
Interagency Statement on Supervisory Approach for Qualified and Non-Qualified Mortgage Loans
Applicability: This guidance applies to all institutions supervised by the Federal Reserve, including those with $10 billion or less in total consolidated assets.
The Federal Reserve and the other federal financial institutions regulatory agencies1 issued the attached statement to clarify safety-and-soundness expectations and Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) considerations for regulated institutions engaged in residential mortgage lending in light of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (Bureau) Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage Standards Rule (Ability-to-Repay Rule).2
The statement is intended to guide institutions as they assess the implementation of the Bureau’s Ability-to-Repay Rule, which takes effect January 10, 2014. From a safety-and-soundness perspective, the agencies emphasize that an institution may originate both qualified and non-qualified residential mortgage loans (QM and non-QM, respectively), based on its business strategy and risk appetite. The agencies will not subject a residential mortgage loan to safety-and-soundness criticism solely because of the loan’s status as a QM or non-QM loan. Regardless of whether a residential mortgage loan is a QM or non-QM, an institution should address key risk areas in residential mortgage lending, including loan terms, borrower qualification standards, loan-to-value limits, documentation requirements, and portfolio- and risk-management practices.
From a consumer protection perspective, the agencies responsible for conducting CRA evaluations do not anticipate that an institution’s decision to originate only QMs, absent other factors, would adversely affect its CRA evaluations. As recently addressed in the Interagency Statement on Fair Lending Compliance and the Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage Standards Rule, the requirements of the Bureau’s Ability-to-Repay Rule and the fair lending laws are similarly compatible.3
Questions regarding this letter should be directed to the following individuals:
- Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation: David Emmel, Manager, at (202) 912-4602; or Donald Gabbai, Senior Supervisory Financial Analyst, at (202) 452-3358; or
- Division of Consumer and Community Affairs: Carol Evans, Assistant Director, at (202) 452-2051; or Amy Henderson, Manager, at (202) 452-3140.
In addition, institutions may send questions via the Board’s public website.4
signed by
Michael S. Gibson
Director
Division of Banking
Supervision and Regulation
signed by
Sandra F. Braunstein
Director
Division of Consumer
and Community Affairs
- CA letter 13-15, “Interagency Statement on Fair Lending Compliance and the Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage Standards Rule”
Notes:
- The other federal financial institutions regulatory agencies include the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Return to text
- See Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage Standards Rule under the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z), 78 FR 6408 (Jan. 30, 2013), as amended. The Ability-to-Repay Rule requires institutions to make reasonable, good faith determinations that consumers have the ability to repay mortgage loans before extending such loans. Return to text
- Refer to CA letter 13-15, "Interagency Statement on Fair Lending Compliance and the Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage Standards Rule." Return to text
- See http://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/contactus/feedback.aspx. Return to text