Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS)
October 2023
Labor Market Discrimination and the Racial Unemployment Gap: Can Monetary Policy Make a Difference?
Isabel Cairó, Avi Lipton
Abstract:
Black workers experience a higher unemployment rate, as well as more volatile employment dynamics, than white workers, and the racial unemployment rate gap is largely unexplained by observable characteristics. We develop a New Keynesian model with search and matching frictions in the labor market, endogenous separations, and employer discrimination against Black workers to explain these outcomes. The model is consistent with key features of the aggregate economy and is able to explain key labor market disparities across racial groups. We then use this model to assess the effects of the Federal Reserve's new monetary policy framework--interest rates respond to shortfalls of employment from its maximum level rather than deviations--on racial inequality in the labor market. We find that shifting from a Deviations interest rate rule to a Shortfalls rule reduces the racial unemployment rate gap and the model-based measures of labor market discrimination but increases the average in ation rate. From a welfare perspective, we find that the Shortfalls approach does not do much to reduce racial inequality in our model economy.
Keywords: Unemployment, Monetary Policy, Racial Inequality, Discrimination
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2023.065
PDF: Full Paper
Disclaimer: The economic research that is linked from this page represents the views of the authors and does not indicate concurrence either by other members of the Board's staff or by the Board of Governors. The economic research and their conclusions are often preliminary and are circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The Board values having a staff that conducts research on a wide range of economic topics and that explores a diverse array of perspectives on those topics. The resulting conversations in academia, the economic policy community, and the broader public are important to sharpening our collective thinking.