International Finance Discussion Papers (IFDP)
August 2025
Food, Fuel, and Facts: Distributional Effects of Global Price Shocks
Saroj Bhattarai, Arpita Chatterjee, and Gautham Udupa
Abstract:
We estimate distributional implications of global food and oil price shocks by utilizing monthly panel data on consumption and income from India, and an IV strategy that removes variation coming from global demand shocks. While both shocks lead to stagflationary aggregate dynamics, they differ in terms of distributional consequences. Consumption of lower income deciles is affected more by exogenous increases in food prices, while consumption of both tails of the income distribution is affected similarly by exogenous increases in oil prices. These heterogeneous negative consumption responses largely mirror the pattern of heterogeneity in wage income responses. Increases in relative expenditure of food, despite a rise in the relative local price of food, provides clear evidence for non-homothetic demand in non-durable consumption. Estimating the slopes of the Engel curve by impulse response matching, we find that food, compared to fuel, is a necessary consumption good for all income groups. Comparing the model predictions with the empirical consumption responses, we decompose the role played by wage income, relative price changes, and non-homotheticity in explaining our results.
Keywords: Global Price shocks; Food prices; Oil prices; Inequality; Household heterogeneity; Household consumption; Necessary good; Non-homotheticity; India
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/IFDP.2025.1414
PDF: Full Paper
Disclaimer: The economic research that is linked from this page represents the views of the authors and does not indicate concurrence either by other members of the Board's staff or by the Board of Governors. The economic research and their conclusions are often preliminary and are circulated to stimulate discussion and critical comment. The Board values having a staff that conducts research on a wide range of economic topics and that explores a diverse array of perspectives on those topics. The resulting conversations in academia, the economic policy community, and the broader public are important to sharpening our collective thinking.