Caregiving for children and parental labor force participation during the pandemic, Accessible Data

Figure 1. Parents age 25-54 with school-age children who report being out of the labor force for caregiving reasons, relative to same month in 2019

Percentage Points

  fathers mothers
2020m1 -0.1 -0.5
2020m2 0.0 -0.3
2020m3 0.2 -0.3
2020m4 0.8 1.6
2020m5 0.6 1.6
2020m6 0.7 1.8
2020m7 0.4 0.0
2020m8 0.4 0.9
2020m9 0.7 2.7
2020m10 1.0 3.0
2020m11 0.7 2.6
2020m12 0.5 2.7
2021m1 0.6 1.4
2021m2 0.6 2.1
2021m3 0.4 1.6
2021m4 0.6 1.6
2021m5 0.6 1.8
2021m6 0.6 1.2
2021m7 0.7 0.0
2021m8 0.3 1.3

Note: Figure shows the change in the percent of mothers and fathers with at least one child age 6 to 17 that report being not in the labor force with caregiving as their primary activity, for the given month relative to the same calendar month in 2019. Key identifies bars in order from left to right.

Source: Authors’ estimates from publicly available microdata to the Current Population Survey.

Return to text

Figure 2. Percent of students in public school districts that provide fully remote, fully in-person, or hybrid education

Percent of students

  hybrid inperson remote
9/14/2020 33.5 25.1 41.4
9/21/2020 34.1 25.0 40.9
9/28/2020 35.2 25.6 39.2
10/5/2020 35.8 26.8 37.4
10/12/2020 36.7 27.8 35.5
10/19/2020 39.1 27.8 33.1
10/26/2020 41.0 27.7 31.3
11/2/2020 38.6 30.0 31.4
11/9/2020 38.7 30.5 30.7
11/16/2020 38.2 29.3 32.5
11/23/2020 35.6 29.2 35.2
11/30/2020 36.6 26.1 37.4
12/7/2020 38.5 25.8 35.7
12/14/2020 35.0 25.5 39.5
12/21/2020 34.9 24.6 40.4
12/28/2020 35.5 24.5 40.0
1/4/2021 36.3 21.1 42.6
1/11/2021 42.8 21.6 35.6
1/18/2021 44.9 23.7 31.4
1/25/2021 45.4 26.9 27.7
2/1/2021 48.0 27.7 24.3
2/8/2021 49.1 28.8 22.1
2/15/2021 49.0 29.6 21.4
2/22/2021 52.0 29.6 18.3
3/1/2021 54.7 30.1 15.2
3/8/2021 55.8 31.2 13.0
3/15/2021 56.8 32.5 10.6
3/22/2021 56.5 34.2 9.3
3/29/2021 56.4 35.3 8.3
4/5/2021 56.1 37.3 6.6
4/12/2021 57.2 39.5 3.3
4/19/2021 56.4 41.2 2.4
4/26/2021 55.6 42.5 1.8
5/3/2021 54.9 43.6 1.4
5/10/2021 54.5 44.1 1.4
5/17/2021 53.9 44.6 1.5
5/24/2021 53.0 45.6 1.5
5/31/2021 53.7 44.9 1.4
6/7/2021 52.8 45.8 1.4

Note: Figure shows the percent of public school students in grades K to 12 that were estimated to be in districts that were fully remote, fully in-person, or in districts where a choice was provided or a hybrid approach was used.

Source: Authors’ estimates from data provided by the American Enterprise Institute’s Return To Learn Tracker.

Return to text

Figure 3. Fraction of population who report being out of the labor force for caregiving reasons

Change from same monthv in 2019, In pp.

  Total All 16 and older with at least one child age 6 to 17 All 16 and older without a child All 16 and older with only children age 5 and younger
1/1/2020 -0.29 -0.05 -0.16 -0.08
2/1/2020 -0.25 -0.02 -0.15 -0.07
3/1/2020 -0.16 0.00 -0.09 -0.07
4/1/2020 0.55 0.21 0.36 -0.02
5/1/2020 0.28 0.14 0.25 -0.11
6/1/2020 0.23 0.17 0.18 -0.11
7/1/2020 -0.06 0.02 -0.01 -0.06
8/1/2020 0.11 0.09 0.02 0.00
9/1/2020 0.61 0.30 0.28 0.03
10/1/2020 0.60 0.40 0.18 0.02
11/1/2020 0.70 0.33 0.30 0.07
12/1/2020 0.77 0.34 0.36 0.07
1/1/2021 0.47 0.20 0.29 -0.02
2/1/2021 0.37 0.24 0.20 -0.08
3/1/2021 0.29 0.17 0.16 -0.04
4/1/2021 0.39 0.15 0.28 -0.05
5/1/2021 0.43 0.13 0.38 -0.08
6/1/2021 0.28 0.08 0.24 -0.03
7/1/2021 0.10 -0.01 0.19 -0.09
8/1/2021 0.31 0.14 0.19 -0.02

Note: The black line in the figure shows the increase in the fraction of the population age 16 and older that reported being out of the labor force with caregiving as their primary activity, for the listed calendar month relative to the same month in 2019. The white, dark blue, and orange bars show the amount of the total change in caregiving attributable to particular groups; the three colored bars sum to the black line.

Source: Authors’ estimates from publicly available microdata to the Current Population Survey.

Return to text

Figure 4. Gap in LFPR and EPOP between mothers and non-mothers, relative to the same pre-COVID month

A. Labor force participation rate

Diff. in womens' Ifprs (pp), mothers rel. to non-mothers

  Actual difference (relative to 2018-2019) Regression adjusted difference
1/1/2020 -0.31 -0.40
2/1/2020 0.14 -0.03
3/1/2020 -0.35 -0.35
4/1/2020 -0.79 -0.51
5/1/2020 0.25 0.41
6/1/2020 -1.54 -1.26
7/1/2020 0.38 0.37
8/1/2020 -0.58 -0.67
9/1/2020 -1.98 -2.04
10/1/2020 -2.67 -2.52
11/1/2020 -2.37 -1.94
12/1/2020 -1.67 -0.97
1/1/2021 -0.91 -0.57
2/1/2021 -1.22 -0.92
3/1/2021 -1.39 -0.94
4/1/2021 -0.76 -0.47
5/1/2021 -0.86 -0.62
6/1/2021 -0.85 -0.67
7/1/2021 0.50 0.58
8/1/2021 -1.06 -0.81

Note: The blue line in the figures show, for women age 25 to 54, the gaps between the labor force participation rates and employment-to-population ratios for mothers with at least one child age 6 to 17 relative to women without children, for the given month relative to the average of the same month in 2018 and 2019. The red line shows the difference after adjusting for observable characteristics as listed in the text; it plots the coefficients from a linear probability regression of labor force participation or employment on indicator variables for the months listed in the figure interacted with an indicator for having a child age 6 to 17, using the sample of all women age 25 to 54 in 2018 to 2021. See text for more details.

Source: Authors’ estimates from publicly available microdata to the Current Population Survey.

B. Employment-to-population ratio

Diff. in womens' epops (pp), mothers rel. to non-mothers

  Actual difference (relative to 2018-2019) Regression adjusted difference
1/1/2020 -0.72 -0.84
2/1/2020 0.17 -0.03
3/1/2020 -0.70 -0.91
4/1/2020 0.40 0.47
5/1/2020 1.26 1.21
6/1/2020 -0.17 -0.08
7/1/2020 1.36 1.16
8/1/2020 0.18 -0.09
9/1/2020 -0.27 -0.45
10/1/2020 -1.93 -1.89
11/1/2020 -1.56 -1.19
12/1/2020 -0.99 -0.39
1/1/2021 -0.85 -0.66
2/1/2021 -1.06 -0.93
3/1/2021 -1.38 -1.09
4/1/2021 -0.32 -0.15
5/1/2021 -0.39 -0.30
6/1/2021 -0.05 -0.04
7/1/2021 0.70 0.64
8/1/2021 -0.47 -0.38

Note: The blue line in the figures show, for women age 25 to 54, the gaps between the labor force participation rates and employment-to-population ratios for mothers with at least one child age 6 to 17 relative to women without children, for the given month relative to the average of the same month in 2018 and 2019. The red line shows the difference after adjusting for observable characteristics as listed in the text; it plots the coefficients from a linear probability regression of labor force participation or employment on indicator variables for the months listed in the figure interacted with an indicator for having a child age 6 to 17, using the sample of all women age 25 to 54 in 2018 to 2021. See text for more details.

Source: Authors’ estimates from publicly available microdata to the Current Population Survey.

Return to text

Figure 5. Percent of mothers age 25-54 who report being out of the labor force for caregiving reasons (relative to same quarter in 2019)

A. By race and ethnicity

Percentage Points

  White mothers Black mothers Hispanic mothers
2020q1 -0.1 -1.9 -1.5
2020q2 0.5 2.8 3.4
2020q3 -0.1 2.2 3.1
2020q4 1.1 4.9 4.7
2021q1 1.5 3.4 0.6
2021q2 0.8 1.7 3.4

Note: Key identifies bars in order from left to right.

Source: Authors’ estimates from publicly available microdata to the Current Population Survey.

Return to text

Figure 5. Percent of mothers age 25-54 who report being out of the labor force for caregiving reasons (relative to same quarter in 2019)

B. By education

Percentage Points

  Mothers without college education Mothers with at least some college education
2020q1 -0.1 -1.9
2020q2 0.5 2.8
2020q3 -0.1 2.2
2020q4 1.1 4.9
2021q1 1.5 3.4
2021q2 0.8 1.7

Note: This figure shows the change in the percent of mothers age 25 to 54 with at least one child between the ages of 6 and 17 and with the listed characteristics that report being not in the labor force with caregiving as their primary activity, for the given quarter relative to the same quarter in 2019. (Specifically, we calculate the deviation for each calendar month relative to the same calendar month in 2019, and then average for each quarter.) Key identifies bars in order from left to right.

Source: Authors’ estimates from publicly available microdata to the Current Population Survey.

Return to text

Figure 6. Percent of students in public school districts that provide fully remote or in-person education, for districts where students are predominantly white or predominantly minority

Percent of students

  Predominantly white: Fully in-person Predominantly minority: Fully in-person Predominantly white: Fully remote Predominantly minority: Fully remote
9/14/2020 27 23 23 58
9/21/2020 27 23 22 58
9/28/2020 28 23 21 55
10/5/2020 29 25 20 53
10/12/2020 29 27 18 51
10/19/2020 29 27 17 48
10/26/2020 28 27 17 44
11/2/2020 32 29 15 46
11/9/2020 32 29 15 45
11/16/2020 31 28 17 46
11/23/2020 30 28 22 47
11/30/2020 28 24 25 49
12/7/2020 27 24 25 46
12/14/2020 26 25 27 51
12/21/2020 26 23 28 51
12/28/2020 26 23 29 50
1/4/2021 24 18 29 55
1/11/2021 25 18 22 47
1/18/2021 28 20 17 45
1/25/2021 30 24 13 41
2/1/2021 31 25 10 37
2/8/2021 32 26 8 35
2/15/2021 34 26 7 34
2/22/2021 34 26 5 30
3/1/2021 36 25 3 26
3/8/2021 37 26 3 22
3/15/2021 39 27 2 18
3/22/2021 41 28 2 16
3/29/2021 42 29 1 15
4/5/2021 45 31 1 12
4/12/2021 48 32 1 6
4/19/2021 49 34 1 4
4/26/2021 52 35 0 3
5/3/2021 53 36 0 3
5/10/2021 52 37 0 2
5/17/2021 53 37 0 3
5/24/2021 53 39 0 3
5/31/2021 53 38 0 2
6/7/2021 53 39 0 2

Note: Figure shows the percent of public school students in grades K to 12 that were estimated to be in districts that were fully remote, fully in-person, or in districts where a choice was provided or a hybrid approach was used. Predominantly white districts are those where at least 50 percent of students are white; predominantly minority districts are all other districts.

Source: Authors’ estimates from data provided by the American Enterprise Institute’s Return To Learn Tracker.

Return to text

Last Update: November 05, 2021