1. FRRS Home
  2. Guidance
  4. Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness

Federal Reserve Regulatory Service

Subscribe
3-1579.3

SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS—Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness

  • I. 
    Introduction
    • A. 
      Preservation of existing authority
    • B. 
      Definitions
  • II. 
    Operational and Managerial Standards
    • A. 
      Internal controls and information systems
    • B. 
      Internal-audit system
    • C. 
      Loan documentation
    • D. 
      Credit underwriting
    • E. 
      Interest-rate exposure
    • F. 
      Asset growth
    • G. 
      Asset quality
    • H. 
      Earnings
    • I. 
      Compensation, fees, and benefits
  • III. 
    Prohibition on Compensation That Constitutes an Unsafe and Unsound Practice
    • A. 
      Excessive compensation
    • B. 
      Compensation leading to material financial loss
I. Introduction
i. Section 39 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act1 (FDI Act) requires each federal banking agency (collectively, the agencies) to establish certain safety-and-soundness standards by regulation or by guideline for all insured depository institutions. Under section 39, the agencies must establish three types of standards: (1) operational and managerial standards; (2) compensation standards; and (3) such standards relating to asset quality, earnings, and stock valuation as they determine to be appropriate.
ii. Section 39(a) requires the agencies to establish operational and managerial standards relating to (1) internal controls, information systems, and internal audit systems, in accordance with section 36 of the FDI Act (12 USC 1831m); (2) loan documentation; (3) credit underwriting; (4) interest-rate exposure; (5) asset growth; and (6) compensation, fees, and benefits, in accordance with subsection (c) of section 39. Section 39(b) requires the agencies to establish standards relating to asset quality, earnings, and stock valuation that the agencies determine to be appropriate.
iii. Section 39(c) requires the agencies to establish standards prohibiting as an unsafe and unsound practice any compensatory arrangement that would provide any executive officer, employee, director, or principal shareholder of the institution with excessive compensation, fees, or benefits and any compensatory arrangement that could lead to material financial loss to an institution. Section 39(c) also requires that the agencies establish standards that specify when compensation is excessive.
iv. If an agency determines that an institution fails to meet any standard established by guideline under subsection (a) or (b) of section 39, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard. In the event that an institution fails to submit an acceptable plan within the time allowed by the agency or fails in any material respect to implement an accepted plan, the agency must, by order, require the institution to correct the deficiency. The agency may, and in some cases must, take other supervisory actions until the deficiency has been corrected.
v. The agencies have adopted amendments to their rules and regulations to establish deadlines for submission and review of compliance plans.2
vi. The following guidelines set out the safety-and-soundness standards that the agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. The agencies believe that the standards adopted in these guidelines serve this end without dictating how institutions must be managed and operated. These standards are designed to identify potential safety-and-soundness concerns and ensure that action is taken to address those concerns before they pose a risk to the deposit insurance funds.
A. Preservation of existing authority. Neither section 39 nor these guidelines in any way limits the authority of the agencies to address unsafe or unsound practices, violations of law, unsafe or unsound conditions, or other practices. Action under section 39 and these guidelines may be taken independently of, in conjunction with, or in addition to any other enforcement action available to the agencies. Nothing in these guidelines limits the authority of the FDIC pursuant to section 38(i)(2)(F) of the FDI Act (12 USC 1831(o)) and part 325 of title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
B. Definitions.
1. In general. For purposes of these guidelines, except as modified in the guidelines or unless the context otherwise requires, the terms used have the same meanings as set forth in sections 3 and 39 of the FDI Act (12 USC 1813 and 1831p-1).
2. Board of directors, in the case of a state-licensed insured branch of a foreign bank and in the case of a federal branch of a foreign bank, means the managing official in charge of the insured foreign branch.
3. Compensation means all direct and indirect payments or benefits, both cash and noncash, granted to or for the benefit of any executive officer, employee, director, or principal shareholder, including but not limited to payments or benefits derived from an employment contract, compensation or benefit agreement, fee arrangement, perquisite, stock option plan, postemployment benefit, or other compensatory arrangement.
4. Director shall have the meaning described in 12 CFR 215.2(c).3
5. Executive officer shall have the meaning described in 12 CFR 215.2(d).4
6. Principal shareholder shall have the meaning described in 12 CFR 215.2(l).5
II. Operational and Managerial Standards
A. Internal controls and information systems. An institution should have internal controls and information systems that are appropriate to the size of the institution and the nature, scope, and risk of its activities and that provide for—
  • 1.
    an organizational structure that establishes clear lines of authority and responsibility for monitoring adherence to established policies;
  • 2.
    effective risk assessment;
  • 3.
    timely and accurate financial, operational, and regulatory reports;
  • 4.
    adequate procedures to safeguard and manage assets; and
  • 5.
    compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
B. Internal-audit system.* An institution should have an internal-audit system that is appropriate to the size of the institution and the nature and scope of its activities and that provides for—
  • 1.
    adequate monitoring of the system of internal controls through an internal-audit function. (For an institution whose size, complexity, or scope of operations does not warrant a full-scale internal-audit function, a system of independent reviews of key internal controls may be used.);
  • 2.
    independence and objectivity;
  • 3.
    qualified persons;
  • 4.
    adequate testing and review of information systems;
  • 5.
    adequate documentation of tests and findings and any corrective actions;
  • 6.
    verification and review of management actions to address material weaknesses; and
  • 7.
    review by the institution’s audit committee or board of directors of the effectiveness of the internal audit systems.
C. Loan documentation. An institution should establish and maintain loan documentation practices that—
  • 1.
    enable the institution to make an informed lending decision and to assess risk, as necessary, on an ongoing basis;
  • 2.
    identify the purpose of a loan and the source of repayment, and assess the ability of the borrower to repay the indebtedness in a timely manner;
  • 3.
    ensure that any claim against a borrower is legally enforceable;
  • 4.
    demonstrate appropriate administration and monitoring of a loan; and
  • 5.
    take account of the size and complexity of a loan.
D. Credit underwriting. An institution should establish and maintain prudent credit-underwriting practices that—
  • 1.
    are commensurate with the types of loans the institution will make and consider the terms and conditions under which they will be made;
  • 2.
    consider the nature of the markets in which loans will be made;
  • 3.
    provide for consideration, prior to credit commitment, of the borrower’s overall financial condition and resources, the financial responsibility of any guarantor, the nature and value of any underlying collateral, and the borrower’s character and willingness to repay as agreed;
  • 4.
    establish a system of independent, ongoing credit review and appropriate communication to management and to the board of directors;
  • 5.
    take adequate account of concentration of credit risk; and
  • 6.
    are appropriate to the size of the institution and the nature and scope of its activities.
E. Interest-rate exposure. An institution should—
  • 1.
    manage interest-rate risk in a manner that is appropriate to the size of the institution and the complexity of its assets and liabilities; and
  • 2.
    provide for periodic reporting to management and the board of directors regarding interest-rate risk with adequate information for management and the board of directors to assess the level of risk.
F. Asset growth. An institution’s asset growth should be prudent and consider—
  • 1.
    the source, volatility, and use of the funds that support asset growth;
  • 2.
    any increase in credit risk or interest-rate risk as a result of growth; and
  • 3.
    the effect of growth on the institution’s capital.
G. Asset quality. An insured depository institution should establish and maintain a system that is commensurate with the institution’s size and the nature and scope of its operations to identify problem assets and prevent deterioration in those assets. The institution should—
  • 1.
    conduct periodic asset-quality reviews to identify problem assets;
  • 2.
    estimate the inherent losses in those assets and establish reserves that are sufficient to absorb estimated losses;
  • 3.
    compare problem-asset totals to capital;
  • 4.
    take appropriate corrective action to resolve problem assets;
  • 5.
    consider the size and potential risks of material asset concentrations; and
  • 6.
    provide periodic asset reports with adequate information for management and the board of directors to assess the level of asset risk.
H. Earnings. An insured depository institution should establish and maintain a system that is commensurate with the institution’s size and the nature and scope of its operations to evaluate and monitor earnings and ensure that earnings are sufficient to maintain adequate capital and reserves. The institution should—
  • 1.
    compare recent earnings trends relative to equity, assets, or other commonly used benchmarks to the institution’s historical results and those of its peers;
  • 2.
    evaluate the adequacy of earnings given the size, complexity, and risk profile of the institution’s assets and operations;
  • 3.
    assess the source, volatility, and sustainability of earnings, including the effect of nonrecurring or extraordinary income or expense;
  • 4.
    take steps to ensure that earnings are sufficient to maintain adequate capital and reserves after considering the institution’s asset quality and growth rate; and
  • 5.
    provide periodic earnings reports with adequate information for management and the board of directors to assess earnings performance.
I. Compensation, fees, and benefits. An institution should maintain safeguards to prevent the payment of compensation, fees, and benefits that are excessive or that could lead to material financial loss to the institution.
III. Prohibition on Compensation That Constitutes an Unsafe and Unsound Practice
A. Excessive compensation. Excessive compensation is prohibited as an unsafe and unsound practice. Compensation shall be considered excessive when amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer, employee, director, or principal shareholder, considering the following:
  • 1.
    the combined value of all cash and noncash benefits provided to the individual;
  • 2.
    the compensation history of the individual and other individuals with comparable expertise at the institution;
  • 3.
    the financial condition of the institution;
  • 4.
    comparable compensation practices at comparable institutions, based upon such factors as asset size, geographic location, and the complexity of the loan portfolio or other assets;
  • 5.
    for postemployment benefits, the projected total cost and benefit to the institution;
  • 6.
    any connection between the individual and any fraudulent act or omission, breach of trust or fiduciary duty, or insider abuse with regard to the institution; and
  • 7.
    any other factors the agencies determine to be relevant.
B. Compensation leading to material financial loss. Compensation that could lead to material financial loss to an institution is prohibited as an unsafe and unsound practice. 12 CFR 208, appendix D-1.
1
Section 39 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 USC 1831p-1) was added by section 132 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), Pub. L. 102-242, 105 Stat. 2236 (1991), and amended by section 956 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, Pub. L. 102-550, 106 Stat. 3895 (1992) and section 318 of the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, Pub. L. 103-325, 108 Stat. 2160 (1994).
2
For the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, these regulations appear at 12 CFR 30; for the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, these regulations appear at 12 CFR 263; for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, these regulations appear at 12 CFR 308, subpart R; and for the Office of Thrift Supervision, these regulations appear at 12 CFR 570.
3
In applying these definitions for savings associations, pursuant to 12 USC 1464, savings associations shall use the terms “savings association” and “insured savings association” in place of the terms “member bank” and “insured bank.”
4
See footnote 3 in section I.B.4. of this appendix.
5
See footnote 3 in section I.B.4. of this appendix.
*
See also 3-1502.5.