Accessible Version

Figure 1. How stress testing works for large banks

Caption: The Federal Reserve conducts stress tests to ensure that large banks are sufficiently capitalized and able to lend to households and businesses even in a severe recession. The stress tests evaluate the financial resilience of banks by estimating losses, revenues, expenses, and resulting capital levels under hypothetical economic conditions. In this infographic, there are three arrows on the left side that are pointing to the right. The first arrow says, "The Federal Reserve develops stress test scenarios." The second arrow says, "The Federal Reserve develops or selects stress test models." The third arrow says, "Banks submit detailed bank data." At times, Federal Reserve staff engage staff from banks subject to the stress test to better understand the submitted bank data and make adjustments, if needed. The arrows are pointing to box in the middle of the figure that says, "Using the scenario data and bank data as variables in the stress test models, the Federal Reserve projects how banks are likely to perform under a hypothetical recession." The middle box is pointing to a box on the right side that says, "The Federal Reserve uses the results of the supervisory stress test, in part, to inform capital requirements for participating banks."

Return to text
Figure 2. Aggregate maximum decline in stressed common equity tier 1 capital ratio, severely adverse scenario

Percentage points

Year Change in CET1 Ratio
2020 stress test -2.1
2021 stress test -2.4
2022 stress test -2.7
2023 stress test -2.5
2024 stress test -2.8
2025 stress test -1.8

Note: Each bar represents the aggregate maximum common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio decline of the banks in each exercise.

Return to text
Figure 3. Decomposition of year-over-year changes in aggregate maximum decline in stressed common equity tier 1 capital ratio, severely adverse scenario

Percentage points

CET1 capital ratio Year-over-year changes
2024 stress test -2.8
Scenario 0.2
Private equity losses 0.1
Pre-provision net revenue 0.4
Trading and counterparty losses 0.2
2025 stress test -1.8

Note: The 2024 stress test bar shows the aggregate common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital decline resulting from the 2024 stress test. The scenario, private equity losses, pre-provision net revenue, and trading and counterparty losses bars show the impact that changes in each of these elements had on the difference between 2024 and 2025 stress test results. As a percent of starting risk-weighted assets, other changes accounting for less than 0.1 percent of the difference between 2025 stress test and 2024 stress test CET1 capital decline are not included in this chart. The 2025 stress test bar shows the aggregate CET1 capital decline resulting from the 2025 stress test. The sample includes the 22 banks subject to the supervisory stress test in 2025 compared with those 22 banks in the 2024 supervisory stress test. The figure is based on numbers at the minimum aggregate capital ratio quarter (fourth quarter) of the 2025 stress test. Values may not sum precisely due to rounding.

Return to text
Figure 4. Aggregate maximum decline in stressed common equity tier 1 capital ratio, with averaging for 2025 stress test
Year Change in CET1 Ratio
2020 stress test -2.1
2021 stress test -2.4
2022 stress test -2.7
2023 stress test -2.5
2024 stress test -2.8
2025 stress test -1.8
2025 stress test averaging -2.3

Note: Each bar represents the aggregate maximum CET1 capital ratio decline of the banks in each exercise. The averaged aggregate decline is the result of averaging the 2024 and 2025 results for the 22 banks in this year’s stress test, rounded to one decimal point.

Return to text
Figure 5. When BHCs, covered SLHCs, and IHCs are required to participate in the supervisory stress test

The Board conducts stress tests of banks it supervises on an annual or two-year cycle. Based on a bank’s financial condition, size, complexity, risk profile, risks to the U.S. economy, or scope of operations or activities, the Board may conduct a stress test of a bank more or less frequently than required.

Applies to every year:

  • U.S. global systemically important bank holding companies (Category I)
  • Domestic bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies of foreign banks with $700 billion or more in total assets or $75 billion or more in cross-jurisdictional activity (Category II)
  • Domestic bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies of foreign banks with $250 billion or more in total assets or $75 billion or more in weighted short-term wholesale funding, nonbank assets, or off-balance-sheet exposure (Category III)

Applies to every 2 years: (in years ending in an even number)

  • Domestic bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies of foreign banks with $100 billion or more in total assets that do not meet the requirements for every-year stress testing (Category IV)

Note: Bank holding companies of this asset size may also elect to participate in a stress test in a year ending in an odd number.

Return to text
Figure 6. Aggregate common equity capital ratio for 22 banks in the 2025 stress test

Percent

Date Ratio
2009:Q1 4.9892
2009:Q2 6.2836
2009:Q3 7.5859
2009:Q4 7.969
2010:Q1 8.3304
2010:Q2 8.8231
2010:Q3 9.2064
2010:Q4 9.4902
2011:Q1 9.668
2011:Q2 9.894
2011:Q3 9.9109
2011:Q4 10.2147
2012:Q1 10.8365
2012:Q2 10.9231
2012:Q3 11.1461
2012:Q4 11.3258
2013:Q1 10.7821
2013:Q2 11.0465
2013:Q3 11.3047
2013:Q4 11.4399
2014:Q1 12.2379
2014:Q2 12.2907
2014:Q3 12.4513
2014:Q4 12.5055
2015:Q1 11.5727
2015:Q2 11.8419
2015:Q3 12.0843
2015:Q4 12.3705
2016:Q1 12.2803
2016:Q2 12.4139
2016:Q3 12.5168
2016:Q4 12.582
2017:Q1 12.5648
2017:Q2 12.684
2017:Q3 12.739
2017:Q4 12.3258
2018:Q1 11.8664
2018:Q2 12.0898
2018:Q3 12.1274
2018:Q4 12.1696
2019:Q1 12.302
2019:Q2 12.4052
2019:Q3 12.2531
2019:Q4 12.067
2020:Q1 11.5792
2020:Q2 12.2632
2020:Q3 12.749
2020:Q4 12.7994
2021:Q1 12.7422
2021:Q2 12.6861
2021:Q3 12.4837
2021:Q4 12.3572
2022:Q1 11.7434
2022:Q2 11.8413
2022:Q3 12.0129
2022:Q4 12.2979
2023:Q1 12.4019
2023:Q2 12.5532
2023:Q3 12.8384
2023:Q4 12.9922
2024:Q1 13.0347
2024:Q2 13.325
2024:Q3 13.4155
2024:Q4 13.4387
2025:Q1 13.3707

Note: The Federal Reserve's evaluation of a bank's common equity capital was initially measured using a tier 1 common capital ratio but now is evaluated using a common equity tier 1 capital ratio. Not all of the banks included in the 2025 stress test reported data for all periods since 2009.

Source: FR Y-9C.

Return to text
Figure 7. Change from start to minimum common equity tier 1 capital ratio in the severely adverse scenario for 2025 stress test and average common equity tier 1 capital decline of 2024 and 2025 stress test

Percentage points

Bank 2025 stress test 2025 stress test averaging
American Express 1.1 1.1
Bank of America 1.7 2.2
Bank of NY-Mellon -0.4 -0.3
Barclays US 3.3 3.7
BMO 4.3 4.9
Capital One 4.2 4.7
Charles Schwab Corp -1.1 -0.9
Citigroup 3.2 3.4
DB USA 11 12.1
Goldman Sachs 2.7 4.1
JPMorgan Chase 1.5 2
M&T 2.1 2.6
Morgan Stanley 3 3.8
Northern Trust -0.5 -0.2
PNC 0.9 1.2
RBC USA 4.6 5.5
State Street -0.5 0
TD Group 2.8 2.5
Truist 1.4 1.7
UBS Americas 5.2 7.2
US Bancorp 1.8 2.1
Wells Fargo 1 2.2

Note: The top bars show the decline from the start of the 2025 stress test in 2024:Q4 to the minimum CET1 capital ratio in the 2025 stress test. The bottom bars show the average of the start-to-minimum capital decline in the 2025 stress test and the 2024 stress test. Estimates of minimum CET1 capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets are for the nine-quarter period from 2025:Q1 to 2027:Q1 for the 2025 stress test and the nine-quarter period from 2024:Q1 to 2026:Q1 for the 2024 stress test. Negative values indicate CET1 ratio increases. The averaged CET1 capital decline for State Street Corporation is 0.0.

Return to text
Figure 8. Pre-tax net income rates in the severely adverse scenario

Percent

Bank Pre-tax net income rates
American Express 3.7
Bank of America -0.7
Bank of NY-Mellon 1.2
Barclays US -0.1
BMO -2.6
Capital One -2.7
Charles Schwab Corp 1.9
Citigroup -0.5
DB USA -3.1
Goldman Sachs 0.7
JPMorgan Chase -0.4
M&T -1.4
Morgan Stanley 0.3
Northern Trust -0.1
PNC -0.3
RBC USA -2.6
State Street 1
TD Group -1.2
Truist -0.9
UBS Americas -0.4
US Bancorp -0.7
Wells Fargo -1.2
Median -0.45

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2025:Q1 to 2027:Q1 as a percent of average assets.

Return to text
Figure 9. Projected losses in the severely adverse scenario

Billions of dollars (percent of total losses)

Scenario Dollars in projected losses Percent in projected losses
First-lien mortgages, domestic 26 5
Junior liens and HELOCs 4 1
Credit cards 157 29
Other consumer loans 31 6
Commercial and industrial loans 124 23
Commercial real estate, domestic 52 9
Other loans 78 14
Securities losses 4 1
Trading and counterparty losses 42 8
Other losses 30 6

Note: Percent of total losses may not sum to 100 because of rounding. Total losses in billions may not sum to the reported total losses because of rounding.

Return to text
Figure 10. Pre-provision net revenue rates in the severely adverse scenario

Percent

Bank Pre-provision net revenue rates
American Express 13.8
Bank of America 1.5
Bank of NY-Mellon 2
Barclays US 3.1
BMO 1.5
Capital One 8
Charles Schwab Corp 2.3
Citigroup 2
DB USA -0.8
Goldman Sachs 2.4
JPMorgan Chase 2.3
M&T 3
Morgan Stanley 2.2
Northern Trust 2.6
PNC 2.7
RBC USA 1.1
State Street 1.7
TD Group 0.8
Truist 2.7
UBS Americas 1.1
US Bancorp 2.6
Wells Fargo 1.8
Median 2.25

Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2025:Q1 to 2027:Q1 as a percent of average assets.

Return to text
Figure A. NBFI loss rates by sub-sector
NBFI Group Loss Rate
Broker-dealers; Credit component 8.5
Private Equity, Business Development Companies and Credit Funds; Credit component 9.7
Special Purpose Entities, Collateralized Loan Obligations and Asset-Backed Securities; Credit component 6.7
Other Financial Vehicles; Liquidity component 7.4
Real Estate Investment Trusts; Liquidity component 8.7
Return to text
Figure B. U.S. G-SIB losses by type under exploratory market shock

Billions of dollars

Type U.S. G-SIB losses
Hedge fund defaults 7.7
Trading 17.2
Credit valuation adjustments 8.4
Return to text
Back to Top
Last Update: October 01, 2025