Accessible Version
Figure 1. How stress testing works for large banks
Caption: The Federal Reserve conducts stress tests to ensure that large banks are sufficiently capitalized and able to lend to households and businesses even in a severe recession. The stress tests evaluate the financial resilience of banks by estimating losses, revenues, expenses, and resulting capital levels under hypothetical economic conditions. In this infographic, there are three arrows on the left side that are pointing to the right. The first arrow says, "The Federal Reserve develops stress test scenarios." The second arrow says, "The Federal Reserve develops or selects stress test models." The third arrow says, "Banks submit detailed bank data." At times, Federal Reserve staff engage staff from banks subject to the stress test to better understand the submitted bank data and make adjustments, if needed. The arrows are pointing to box in the middle of the figure that says, "Using the scenario data and bank data as variables in the stress test models, the Federal Reserve projects how banks are likely to perform under a hypothetical recession." The middle box is pointing to a box on the right side that says, "The Federal Reserve uses the results of the supervisory stress test, in part, to inform capital requirements for participating banks."
Figure 2. Aggregate maximum decline in stressed common equity tier 1 capital ratio, severely adverse scenario
Percentage points
| Year | Change in CET1 Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2020 stress test | -2.1 |
| 2021 stress test | -2.4 |
| 2022 stress test | -2.7 |
| 2023 stress test | -2.5 |
| 2024 stress test | -2.8 |
| 2025 stress test | -1.8 |
Note: Each bar represents the aggregate maximum common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio decline of the banks in each exercise.
Figure 3. Decomposition of year-over-year changes in aggregate maximum decline in stressed common equity tier 1 capital ratio, severely adverse scenario
Percentage points
| CET1 capital ratio | Year-over-year changes |
|---|---|
| 2024 stress test | -2.8 |
| Scenario | 0.2 |
| Private equity losses | 0.1 |
| Pre-provision net revenue | 0.4 |
| Trading and counterparty losses | 0.2 |
| 2025 stress test | -1.8 |
Note: The 2024 stress test bar shows the aggregate common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital decline resulting from the 2024 stress test. The scenario, private equity losses, pre-provision net revenue, and trading and counterparty losses bars show the impact that changes in each of these elements had on the difference between 2024 and 2025 stress test results. As a percent of starting risk-weighted assets, other changes accounting for less than 0.1 percent of the difference between 2025 stress test and 2024 stress test CET1 capital decline are not included in this chart. The 2025 stress test bar shows the aggregate CET1 capital decline resulting from the 2025 stress test. The sample includes the 22 banks subject to the supervisory stress test in 2025 compared with those 22 banks in the 2024 supervisory stress test. The figure is based on numbers at the minimum aggregate capital ratio quarter (fourth quarter) of the 2025 stress test. Values may not sum precisely due to rounding.
Figure 4. Aggregate maximum decline in stressed common equity tier 1 capital ratio, with averaging for 2025 stress test
| Year | Change in CET1 Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2020 stress test | -2.1 |
| 2021 stress test | -2.4 |
| 2022 stress test | -2.7 |
| 2023 stress test | -2.5 |
| 2024 stress test | -2.8 |
| 2025 stress test | -1.8 |
| 2025 stress test averaging | -2.3 |
Note: Each bar represents the aggregate maximum CET1 capital ratio decline of the banks in each exercise. The averaged aggregate decline is the result of averaging the 2024 and 2025 results for the 22 banks in this year’s stress test, rounded to one decimal point.
Figure 5. When BHCs, covered SLHCs, and IHCs are required to participate in the supervisory stress test
The Board conducts stress tests of banks it supervises on an annual or two-year cycle. Based on a bank’s financial condition, size, complexity, risk profile, risks to the U.S. economy, or scope of operations or activities, the Board may conduct a stress test of a bank more or less frequently than required.
Applies to every year:
- U.S. global systemically important bank holding companies (Category I)
- Domestic bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies of foreign banks with $700 billion or more in total assets or $75 billion or more in cross-jurisdictional activity (Category II)
- Domestic bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies of foreign banks with $250 billion or more in total assets or $75 billion or more in weighted short-term wholesale funding, nonbank assets, or off-balance-sheet exposure (Category III)
Applies to every 2 years: (in years ending in an even number)
- Domestic bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies of foreign banks with $100 billion or more in total assets that do not meet the requirements for every-year stress testing (Category IV)
Note: Bank holding companies of this asset size may also elect to participate in a stress test in a year ending in an odd number.
Figure 6. Aggregate common equity capital ratio for 22 banks in the 2025 stress test
Percent
| Date | Ratio |
|---|---|
| 2009:Q1 | 4.9892 |
| 2009:Q2 | 6.2836 |
| 2009:Q3 | 7.5859 |
| 2009:Q4 | 7.969 |
| 2010:Q1 | 8.3304 |
| 2010:Q2 | 8.8231 |
| 2010:Q3 | 9.2064 |
| 2010:Q4 | 9.4902 |
| 2011:Q1 | 9.668 |
| 2011:Q2 | 9.894 |
| 2011:Q3 | 9.9109 |
| 2011:Q4 | 10.2147 |
| 2012:Q1 | 10.8365 |
| 2012:Q2 | 10.9231 |
| 2012:Q3 | 11.1461 |
| 2012:Q4 | 11.3258 |
| 2013:Q1 | 10.7821 |
| 2013:Q2 | 11.0465 |
| 2013:Q3 | 11.3047 |
| 2013:Q4 | 11.4399 |
| 2014:Q1 | 12.2379 |
| 2014:Q2 | 12.2907 |
| 2014:Q3 | 12.4513 |
| 2014:Q4 | 12.5055 |
| 2015:Q1 | 11.5727 |
| 2015:Q2 | 11.8419 |
| 2015:Q3 | 12.0843 |
| 2015:Q4 | 12.3705 |
| 2016:Q1 | 12.2803 |
| 2016:Q2 | 12.4139 |
| 2016:Q3 | 12.5168 |
| 2016:Q4 | 12.582 |
| 2017:Q1 | 12.5648 |
| 2017:Q2 | 12.684 |
| 2017:Q3 | 12.739 |
| 2017:Q4 | 12.3258 |
| 2018:Q1 | 11.8664 |
| 2018:Q2 | 12.0898 |
| 2018:Q3 | 12.1274 |
| 2018:Q4 | 12.1696 |
| 2019:Q1 | 12.302 |
| 2019:Q2 | 12.4052 |
| 2019:Q3 | 12.2531 |
| 2019:Q4 | 12.067 |
| 2020:Q1 | 11.5792 |
| 2020:Q2 | 12.2632 |
| 2020:Q3 | 12.749 |
| 2020:Q4 | 12.7994 |
| 2021:Q1 | 12.7422 |
| 2021:Q2 | 12.6861 |
| 2021:Q3 | 12.4837 |
| 2021:Q4 | 12.3572 |
| 2022:Q1 | 11.7434 |
| 2022:Q2 | 11.8413 |
| 2022:Q3 | 12.0129 |
| 2022:Q4 | 12.2979 |
| 2023:Q1 | 12.4019 |
| 2023:Q2 | 12.5532 |
| 2023:Q3 | 12.8384 |
| 2023:Q4 | 12.9922 |
| 2024:Q1 | 13.0347 |
| 2024:Q2 | 13.325 |
| 2024:Q3 | 13.4155 |
| 2024:Q4 | 13.4387 |
| 2025:Q1 | 13.3707 |
Note: The Federal Reserve's evaluation of a bank's common equity capital was initially measured using a tier 1 common capital ratio but now is evaluated using a common equity tier 1 capital ratio. Not all of the banks included in the 2025 stress test reported data for all periods since 2009.
Source: FR Y-9C.
Figure 7. Change from start to minimum common equity tier 1 capital ratio in the severely adverse scenario for 2025 stress test and average common equity tier 1 capital decline of 2024 and 2025 stress test
Percentage points
| Bank | 2025 stress test | 2025 stress test averaging |
|---|---|---|
| American Express | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Bank of America | 1.7 | 2.2 |
| Bank of NY-Mellon | -0.4 | -0.3 |
| Barclays US | 3.3 | 3.7 |
| BMO | 4.3 | 4.9 |
| Capital One | 4.2 | 4.7 |
| Charles Schwab Corp | -1.1 | -0.9 |
| Citigroup | 3.2 | 3.4 |
| DB USA | 11 | 12.1 |
| Goldman Sachs | 2.7 | 4.1 |
| JPMorgan Chase | 1.5 | 2 |
| M&T | 2.1 | 2.6 |
| Morgan Stanley | 3 | 3.8 |
| Northern Trust | -0.5 | -0.2 |
| PNC | 0.9 | 1.2 |
| RBC USA | 4.6 | 5.5 |
| State Street | -0.5 | 0 |
| TD Group | 2.8 | 2.5 |
| Truist | 1.4 | 1.7 |
| UBS Americas | 5.2 | 7.2 |
| US Bancorp | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| Wells Fargo | 1 | 2.2 |
Note: The top bars show the decline from the start of the 2025 stress test in 2024:Q4 to the minimum CET1 capital ratio in the 2025 stress test. The bottom bars show the average of the start-to-minimum capital decline in the 2025 stress test and the 2024 stress test. Estimates of minimum CET1 capital as a percent of risk-weighted assets are for the nine-quarter period from 2025:Q1 to 2027:Q1 for the 2025 stress test and the nine-quarter period from 2024:Q1 to 2026:Q1 for the 2024 stress test. Negative values indicate CET1 ratio increases. The averaged CET1 capital decline for State Street Corporation is 0.0.
Figure 8. Pre-tax net income rates in the severely adverse scenario
Percent
| Bank | Pre-tax net income rates |
|---|---|
| American Express | 3.7 |
| Bank of America | -0.7 |
| Bank of NY-Mellon | 1.2 |
| Barclays US | -0.1 |
| BMO | -2.6 |
| Capital One | -2.7 |
| Charles Schwab Corp | 1.9 |
| Citigroup | -0.5 |
| DB USA | -3.1 |
| Goldman Sachs | 0.7 |
| JPMorgan Chase | -0.4 |
| M&T | -1.4 |
| Morgan Stanley | 0.3 |
| Northern Trust | -0.1 |
| PNC | -0.3 |
| RBC USA | -2.6 |
| State Street | 1 |
| TD Group | -1.2 |
| Truist | -0.9 |
| UBS Americas | -0.4 |
| US Bancorp | -0.7 |
| Wells Fargo | -1.2 |
| Median | -0.45 |
Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2025:Q1 to 2027:Q1 as a percent of average assets.
Figure 9. Projected losses in the severely adverse scenario
Billions of dollars (percent of total losses)
| Scenario | Dollars in projected losses | Percent in projected losses |
|---|---|---|
| First-lien mortgages, domestic | 26 | 5 |
| Junior liens and HELOCs | 4 | 1 |
| Credit cards | 157 | 29 |
| Other consumer loans | 31 | 6 |
| Commercial and industrial loans | 124 | 23 |
| Commercial real estate, domestic | 52 | 9 |
| Other loans | 78 | 14 |
| Securities losses | 4 | 1 |
| Trading and counterparty losses | 42 | 8 |
| Other losses | 30 | 6 |
Note: Percent of total losses may not sum to 100 because of rounding. Total losses in billions may not sum to the reported total losses because of rounding.
Figure 10. Pre-provision net revenue rates in the severely adverse scenario
Percent
| Bank | Pre-provision net revenue rates |
|---|---|
| American Express | 13.8 |
| Bank of America | 1.5 |
| Bank of NY-Mellon | 2 |
| Barclays US | 3.1 |
| BMO | 1.5 |
| Capital One | 8 |
| Charles Schwab Corp | 2.3 |
| Citigroup | 2 |
| DB USA | -0.8 |
| Goldman Sachs | 2.4 |
| JPMorgan Chase | 2.3 |
| M&T | 3 |
| Morgan Stanley | 2.2 |
| Northern Trust | 2.6 |
| PNC | 2.7 |
| RBC USA | 1.1 |
| State Street | 1.7 |
| TD Group | 0.8 |
| Truist | 2.7 |
| UBS Americas | 1.1 |
| US Bancorp | 2.6 |
| Wells Fargo | 1.8 |
| Median | 2.25 |
Note: Estimates are for the nine-quarter period from 2025:Q1 to 2027:Q1 as a percent of average assets.
Figure A. NBFI loss rates by sub-sector
| NBFI Group | Loss Rate |
|---|---|
| Broker-dealers; Credit component | 8.5 |
| Private Equity, Business Development Companies and Credit Funds; Credit component | 9.7 |
| Special Purpose Entities, Collateralized Loan Obligations and Asset-Backed Securities; Credit component | 6.7 |
| Other Financial Vehicles; Liquidity component | 7.4 |
| Real Estate Investment Trusts; Liquidity component | 8.7 |
Figure B. U.S. G-SIB losses by type under exploratory market shock
Billions of dollars
| Type | U.S. G-SIB losses |
|---|---|
| Hedge fund defaults | 7.7 |
| Trading | 17.2 |
| Credit valuation adjustments | 8.4 |