2. Borrowing by Businesses and Households

Vulnerabilities from business and household debt remained moderate

Balance sheets of many nonfinancial businesses and households remained solid, with vulnerabilities at moderate levels. That said, there are increasing signs that higher interest rates are beginning to strain some borrowers.

For businesses, both the business debt-to-GDP ratio and gross leverage remained at high levels, although they were significantly lower than the record highs reached at the onset of the pandemic. Interest coverage ratios (ICRs)—defined as the ratio of earnings before interest and tax to interest expense—moved down in the most recent data but remain solid, suggesting that firms, overall, have sufficient cash flows to cover rising borrowing costs. Indicators of household vulnerabilities, including the household debt-to-GDP ratio and the aggregate household debt service ratio, remained at modest levels. An economic downturn resulting in lower business earnings and household incomes could weaken the debt service capacities of smaller, at-risk businesses with already low ICRs as well as particularly indebted households.

Table 2.1 shows the amounts outstanding and recent historical growth rates of forms of debt owed by nonfinancial businesses and households as of the second quarter of 2023. The combined total debt of nonfinancial businesses and households grew more slowly than nominal GDP in recent quarters, leading to a decline in the debt-to-GDP ratio, which is now at the level that prevailed over most of the past decade (figure 2.1). The drop in the overall ratio was driven in equal parts by declines in both the household and business debt-to-GDP ratios (figure 2.2).

Table 2.1. Outstanding amounts of nonfinancial business and household credit
Item Outstanding
(billions of dollars)
Growth,
2022:Q2–2023:Q2
(percent)
Average annual growth,
1997–2023:Q2
(percent)
Total private nonfinancial credit 39,915 3.7 5.5
Total nonfinancial business credit 20,335 3.6 5.9
Corporate business credit 13,003 3.2 5.4
Bonds and commercial paper 7,720 2.3 5.5
Bank lending 2,101 8.7 4.5
Leveraged loans1 1,358 3.2 13.1
Noncorporate business credit 7,332 4.2 6.9
Commercial real estate credit 2,971 5.4 6.2
Total household credit 19,580 3.8 5.1
Mortgages 12,850 4.1 5.1
Consumer credit 4,943 5.3 5.4
Student loans 1,765 1.2 8.0
Auto loans 1,533 6.1 5.4
Credit cards 1,225 11.5 3.5
Nominal GDP 26,799 6.1 4.6

Note: The data extend through 2023:Q2. Outstanding amounts are in nominal terms. Growth rates are measured from Q2 of the year immediately preceding the period through Q2 of the final year of the period. The table reports the main components of corporate business credit, total household credit, and consumer credit. Other, smaller components are not reported. The commercial real estate (CRE) row shows CRE debt owed by both nonfinancial corporate and noncorporate businesses as defined in Table L.220: Commercial Mortgages in the "Financial Accounts of the United States." Total household-sector credit includes debt owed by other entities, such as nonprofit organizations. GDP is gross domestic product.

1. Leveraged loans included in this table are an estimate of the leveraged loans that are made to nonfinancial businesses only and do not include the small amount of leveraged loans outstanding for financial businesses. The amount outstanding shows institutional leveraged loans and generally excludes loan commitments held by banks. For example, lines of credit are generally excluded from this measure. Average annual growth of leveraged loans is from 2001 to 2023:Q2, as this market was fairly small before then. Return to table

Source: For leveraged loans, PitchBook Data, Leveraged Commentary & Data; for GDP, Bureau of Economic Analysis, national income and product accounts; for all other items, Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."

Figure 2.1. The total debt of businesses and households relative to GDP declined further
Figure 2.1. The total debt of businesses and households relative
to GDP declined further

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The shaded bars with top caps indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: January 1980–July 1980, July 1981–November 1982, July 1990– March 1991, March 2001–November 2001, December 2007–June 2009, and February 2020– April 2020. GDP is gross domestic product.

Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on Bureau of Economic Analysis, national income and product accounts, and Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."

Figure 2.2. Both business and household debt-to-GDP ratios edged down
Figure 2.2. Both business and household debt-to-GDP ratios edged
down

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The shaded bars with top caps indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: January 1980–July 1980, July 1981–November 1982, July 1990– March 1991, March 2001–November 2001, December 2007–June 2009, and February 2020– April 2020. GDP is gross domestic product.

Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on Bureau of Economic Analysis, national income and product accounts, and Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."

Business debt vulnerabilities remain moderate relative to historical levels

Overall vulnerabilities from nonfinancial business debt increased slightly since the May report but remained moderate overall. While measures of leverage remained high, debt growth continued to decline. Firms' ability to service their debt, as measured by ICRs, edged down a bit in the most recent data but remained solid owing to resilient earnings. However, risky borrowers' ability to service their debt burdens has started to show signs of weakness, as would be expected in a rising interest rate environment, and could become further strained if corporate earnings fall due to a sharper-than-expected slowdown in economic activity.

The growth of nonfinancial business debt adjusted for inflation declined over the past year (figure 2.3), and net issuance of risky debt—defined as the difference between issuance of high-yield bonds, unrated bonds, and leveraged loans minus retirements and repayments—remained subdued as firms repaid existing leveraged loans at a faster pace than new loans were issued (figure 2.4). The net issuance of high-yield and unrated bonds was also subdued through the third quarter of 2023.

Figure 2.3. Business debt adjusted for inflation continued to decline
Figure 2.3. Business debt adjusted for inflation continued to
decline

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Nominal debt growth is seasonally adjusted and is translated into real terms after subtracting the growth rate of the price deflator for the core personal consumption expenditures price index.

Source: Federal Reserve Board, Statistical Release Z.1, "Financial Accounts of the United States."

Figure 2.4. Net issuance of risky debt remained subdued
Figure 2.4. Net issuance of risky debt remained subdued

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The data begin in 2004:Q2. Institutional leveraged loans generally exclude loan commitments held by banks. The key identifies bars in order from top to bottom (except for some bars with at least one negative value).

Source: Mergent, Inc., Fixed Income Securities Database; PitchBook Data, Leveraged Commentary & Data.

Gross leverage—the ratio of debt to assets—of all publicly traded nonfinancial firms remained high by historical standards (figure 2.5). Net leverage—the ratio of debt less cash to total assets—continued to edge up among all large publicly traded businesses and remained high relative to its history. Meanwhile, firms' ability to service their debt remained solid overall, despite some emerging signs of weakness among riskier firms. The median ICR has been steadily declining from its peak reached during the post-pandemic earnings boom and inched down further in Q2 (figure 2.6). The decline partially reflects modest pass-through of higher interest rates to firms' borrowing costs, because most of the debt issued by large firms carries fixed rates.3 Corporate earnings remained solid for the first half of 2023. However, signs of stress in debt servicing and deterioration in credit quality are emerging for the most vulnerable and lowest-rated firms as elevated borrowing costs begin to weigh on interest expenses.4

Figure 2.5. Gross leverage of large businesses remained at high levels by historical standards
Figure 2.5. Gross leverage of large businesses remained at high
levels by historical standards

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Gross leverage is an asset-weighted average of the ratio of firms' book value of total debt to book value of total assets. The 75th percentile is calculated from a sample of the 2,500 largest firms by assets. The dashed sections of the lines in the first quarter of 2019 reflect the structural break in the series due to the 2019 compliance deadline for Financial Accounting Standards Board rule Accounting Standards Update 2016-02. The accounting standard requires operating leases, previously considered off-balance-sheet activities, to be included in measures of debt and assets.

Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on S&P Global, Compustat.

Figure 2.6. Firms' ability to service their debt, as measured by the interest coverage ratio, continued to decline from post-pandemic highs
Figure 2.6. Firms' ability to service their debt, as measured
by the interest coverage ratio, continued to decline from post-pandemic
highs

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The interest coverage ratio is earnings before interest and taxes divided by interest payments. Firms with leverage less than 5 percent and interest payments less than $500,000 are excluded.

Source: Federal Reserve Board staff calculations based on S&P Global, Compustat.

The credit performance of outstanding corporate bonds remained solid, but signs of deterioration have emerged since the May report. The volume of downgrades and defaults remained low, but realized defaults and market expectations of defaults over the next year have been trending up in recent months as pressures from rising interest rates and economic uncertainty mount. More than half of investment-grade bonds outstanding continued to be rated in the lowest category of the investment-grade range (triple-B). If a large share of these bonds were downgraded, debt cost would increase when the bonds need to roll over, putting pressure on firms' balance sheets.

Small and middle-market firms that are privately held—which have less access to capital markets and primarily borrow from banks, private credit and equity funds, and sophisticated investors—account for roughly 60 percent of outstanding U.S. debt. Available data for these firms indicate that vulnerabilities inched up as higher interest rates started to reduce earnings and raise debt service costs.5 Since the last report, leverage for these firms increased slightly following several quarters of post-pandemic declines and is currently roughly in line with leverage levels among publicly traded firms. The ICR for the median firm in this category declined notably but remained at a high level, above that of publicly traded firms.

The credit quality of outstanding and newly issued leveraged loans remained solid through the first half of 2023 but continued to show some signs of deterioration. The volume of credit rating downgrades exceeded the volume of upgrades over this period, and default rates have continued to inch up from their historic lows reached in 2021 (figure 2.7). The share of newly issued loans to large corporations with debt multiples—defined as the ratio of debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization—greater than 4 has fallen to its lowest level in the past decade, suggesting limited investor tolerance for riskier loans (figure 2.8). As noted, a potential slowdown in earnings growth posed by the less favorable economic outlook combined with rising interest rates could put pressure on the credit quality of outstanding leveraged loans, as their floating debt service costs would increase.

Figure 2.7. Default rates on leveraged loans inched up from historically low levels
Figure 2.7. Default rates on leveraged loans inched up from historically
low levels

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The data begin in December 1998. The default rate is calculated as the amount in default over the past 12 months divided by the total outstanding volume at the beginning of the 12-month period. The shaded bars with top caps indicate periods of business recession as defined by the National Bureau of Economic Research: March 2001–November 2001, December 2007–June 2009, and February 2020–April 2020.

Source: PitchBook Data, Leveraged Commentary & Data.

Figure 2.8. New leveraged loans with debt multiples less than 4 continued to rise
Figure 2.8. New leveraged loans with debt multiples less than
4 continued to rise

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Volumes are for large corporations with earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization greater than $50 million and exclude existing tranches of add-ons and amendments as well as restatements with no new money. The key identifies bars in order from top to bottom.

Source: Mergent, Inc., Fixed Income Securities Database; PitchBook Data, Leveraged Commentary & Data.

Delinquencies at small businesses edged up, but credit quality remained solid

Credit quality for small businesses remained relatively solid, though delinquency rates continued to edge up in recent months from relatively low levels. Borrowing costs increased in the first half of 2023 to levels not seen since prior to the Great Recession. In addition, the share of small businesses that borrow regularly declined since the beginning of the year, according to the National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Economic Trends Survey, and was somewhat low relative to historical levels. The share of firms reporting unmet financing needs remained quite low. Loan originations for small businesses remained in line with pre-pandemic levels.

Vulnerabilities from household debt remained moderate

Household balance sheets remained strong overall. Many households that purchased homes or refinanced when interest rates were low continued to benefit from lower interest rate payments, strengthening their current financial position. That said, some borrowers, especially those with newly originated debt as interest rates have increased over the past year and a half, remained financially stretched and more vulnerable to future shocks.

Outstanding household debt adjusted for inflation ticked down in the second quarter, with the decline in the most recent data broad based across the credit score distribution (figure 2.9). The ratio of total required household debt payments to total disposable income (the household debt service ratio) increased slightly since the May report. Nonetheless, the ratio remained at modest levels after reaching a historical low in the first quarter of 2021 amid credit card paydowns with low interest rates at the time. Higher interest rates over the past year have only partially passed through to household interest expenses because, except for credit card debt, only a small share of household debt is subject to floating rates. For most other types of household debt, rising interest rates increase borrowing costs only for new loan originations.

Figure 2.9. Real household debt edged down
Figure 2.9. Real household debt edged down

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Subprime are those with an Equifax Risk Score less than 620; near prime are from 620 to 719; prime are greater than 719. Scores are measured contemporaneously. Student loan balances before 2004 are estimated using average growth from 2004 to 2007, by risk score. The data are converted to constant 2023 dollars using the consumer price index.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; consumer price index, Bureau of Labor Statistics via Haver Analytics.

Mortgage credit risk remained generally low

Mortgage debt, which accounts for roughly two-thirds of total household debt, grew a bit more slowly than GDP over the past four quarters. Estimates of housing leverage when measuring home values as a function of rents and other market fundamentals remained flat and significantly lower than their peak levels before 2008 (figure 2.10, black line). The overall mortgage delinquency rate was essentially unchanged in the most recent data after edging up from the historically low levels reached in 2021, and the share of mortgage balances in loss-mitigation programs remained low (figure 2.11). A very low share of borrowers had negative home equity in the most recent data through June 2023 (figure 2.12).

Figure 2.10. A model-based estimate of housing leverage was flat
Figure 2.10. A model-based estimate of housing leverage was flat

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Housing leverage is estimated as the ratio of the average outstanding mortgage loan balance for owner-occupied homes with a mortgage to (1) current home values using the Zillow national house price index and (2) model-implied house prices estimated by a staff model based on rents, interest rates, and a time trend.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Zillow, Inc., Real Estate Data; Bureau of Labor Statistics via Haver Analytics.

Figure 2.11. Mortgage delinquency rates remained near historically low levels
Figure 2.11. Mortgage delinquency rates remained near historically
low levels

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Loss mitigation includes tradelines that have a narrative code of forbearance, natural disaster, payment deferral (including partial), loan modification (including federal government plans), or loans with no scheduled payment and a nonzero balance. Delinquent includes loans reported to the credit bureau as at least 30 days past due.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax.

Figure 2.12. Very few homeowners had negative equity in their homes
Figure 2.12. Very few homeowners had negative equity in their
homes

Accessible Version | Return to text

Source: CoreLogic, Inc., Real Estate Data.

New mortgage extensions, which have been skewed heavily toward prime borrowers over the past decade, continued to decline sharply in 2023 as mortgage rates remained elevated (figure 2.13). The early payment delinquency rate—the share of balances becoming delinquent within one year of mortgage origination—continued to rise from its 2020 low, likely reflecting increasing strains associated with higher interest expenses on newly originated mortgages.

Figure 2.13. New mortgage extensions to nonprime borrowers were subdued
Figure 2.13. New mortgage extensions to nonprime borrowers were
subdued

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Year-over-year change in balances for the second quarter of each year among those households whose balance increased over this window. Subprime are those with an Equifax Risk Score less than 620; near prime are from 620 to 719; prime are greater than 719. Scores were measured 1 year ago. The data are converted to constant 2023 dollars using the consumer price index. The key identifies bars in order from left to right.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; consumer price index, Bureau of Labor Statistics via Haver Analytics.

Credit risk of outstanding household debt remained generally low, but borrowers with low credit scores continued showing signs of stress

Consumer debt—which accounts for the remaining one-third of household debt and consists primarily of student, auto, and credit card loans—edged down in real terms since the last report (figure 2.14) and, in nominal terms, increased at a slightly slower pace than nominal GDP. However, delinquency rates on newly issued consumer loans rose, particularly among borrowers with low credit scores, as interest rates continued to rise.

Figure 2.14. Real consumer credit edged down in the first half of 2023
Figure 2.14. Real consumer credit edged down in the first half
of 2023

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: The data are converted to constant 2023 dollars using the consumer price index. Student loan data begin in 2005.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; consumer price index, Bureau of Labor Statistics via Haver Analytics.

Real auto loan balances ticked up for prime borrowers but declined modestly for near-prime and subprime borrowers (figure 2.15). Smoothing through the quarter-to-quarter variation over the first half of 2023, the share of auto loan balances in loss mitigation moved sideways and remained roughly in line with its historical median. Those in delinquent status also remained essentially flat, although at a level above the historical median (figure 2.16). That said, the aggregate delinquency rates mask a much sharper rise in auto loan delinquency rates for subprime borrowers in the second quarter of 2023, which increased to a level that was elevated relative to where it stood pre-pandemic.

Figure 2.15. Real auto loans outstanding ticked up for prime borrowers
Figure 2.15. Real auto loans outstanding ticked up for prime
borrowers

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Subprime are those with an Equifax Risk Score less than 620; near prime are from 620 to 719; prime are greater than 719. Scores are measured contemporaneously. The data are converted to constant 2023 dollars using the consumer price index.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; consumer price index, Bureau of Labor Statistics via Haver Analytics.

Figure 2.16. Auto loan delinquencies remained at levels above their historical median
Figure 2.16. Auto loan delinquencies remained at levels above
their historical median

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Loss mitigation includes tradelines that have a narrative code of forbearance, natural disaster, payment deferral (including partial), loan modification (including federal government plans), or loans with no scheduled payment and a nonzero balance. Delinquent includes loans reported to the credit bureau as at least 30 days past due. The data for auto loans are reported semiannually by the Risk Assessment, Data Analysis, and Research Data Warehouse until 2017, after which they are reported quarterly. The data for delinquent/loss mitigation begin in the first quarter of 2001.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax.

Aggregate real credit card balances continued to increase over the first half of the year, and the increases were broad based across the credit score distribution (figure 2.17). Rates paid on these balances increased in line with short-term interest rates over the past year. However, delinquency rates have continued to increase over the same period (figure 2.18).

Figure 2.17. Real credit card balances rose in the first half of 2023
Figure 2.17. Real credit card balances rose in the first half
of 2023

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Subprime are those with an Equifax Risk Score less than 620; near prime are from 620 to 719; prime are greater than 719. Scores are measured contemporaneously. The data are converted to constant 2023 dollars using the consumer price index.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; consumer price index, Bureau of Labor Statistics via Haver Analytics.

Figure 2.18. Credit card delinquencies increased further in the first half of 2023
Figure 2.18. Credit card delinquencies increased further in the
first half of 2023

Accessible Version | Return to text

Note: Delinquency measures the fraction of balances that are at least 30 days past due, excluding severe derogatory loans. The data are seasonally adjusted.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax.

After rising rapidly for more than a decade, student loan debt, after adjusting for inflation, began to decline with the onset of the pandemic. Student loan repayments, which had been on hold since March 2020, are set to resume in October.

 

References

 

3. Only about 5 percent of outstanding bonds rated triple-B and 1 percent of outstanding high-yield bonds are due within a year. Return to text

4. While these firms represent a large share of the number of publicly traded firms (85 percent), their debt constitutes only 35 percent of the total debt in the sector. Return to text

5. An important caveat is that the data on smaller middle-market firms are not as comprehensive as those on large firms. Return to text

Back to Top
Last Update: October 27, 2023